本文關(guān)鍵詞： 南朝辭賦 詩(shī)化 詩(shī)緣情 詩(shī)賦欲麗　出處：《浙江大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類(lèi)型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：南朝辭賦之詩(shī)化,是辭賦研究的重要問(wèn)題,也與南朝詩(shī)歌的發(fā)展息息相關(guān),本文研究南朝辭賦的詩(shī)化,首章上溯先秦兩漢的詩(shī)賦創(chuàng)作觀念,發(fā)現(xiàn)辭賦在起源和早期創(chuàng)作中就受到詩(shī)歌創(chuàng)作和儒家詩(shī)教的影響,其后辭賦發(fā)生詩(shī)化,有著歷史原因。同時(shí)還探究了 "詩(shī)化"概念,認(rèn)為辭賦之詩(shī)化與時(shí)代之創(chuàng)作觀念和審美思維變更有關(guān)。第二章中,本文看到騷體與小賦在形式內(nèi)容上的差異性,立足于辭賦的分類(lèi),從騷體之詩(shī)化與小賦之詩(shī)化兩方面入手,提出騷體與小賦詩(shī)化,其相同點(diǎn)表現(xiàn)在五七言詩(shī)句入賦和創(chuàng)作題材與創(chuàng)作審美的俗化上,而其差異,在騷體中表現(xiàn)為抒情主體的淡出,抒情方式變更,在小賦中表現(xiàn)為創(chuàng)作模式的新變,即從觀物賦德到個(gè)體移情的發(fā)展。南朝辭賦詩(shī)化,外在表征是五七言詩(shī)句入賦,而其內(nèi)在表征則是詩(shī)賦創(chuàng)作理念和審美思維的趨同,因而第三章中,本文論述詩(shī)賦之創(chuàng)作理念,認(rèn)為詩(shī)賦共同受儒家詩(shī)教"詩(shī)言志"及其后在"詩(shī)言志"基礎(chǔ)上發(fā)展的"詩(shī)緣情"、"吟詠情性"觀念影響,在這種創(chuàng)作理念下,騷體中的情境逐漸向意境過(guò)渡,小賦"體物"特征則發(fā)展為物境構(gòu)建。第四章論述詩(shī)賦之審美思維,探索詩(shī)賦之"麗"含義在歷代的發(fā)展和豐富,同時(shí)指出在實(shí)踐創(chuàng)作和文學(xué)理論中,詩(shī)之"麗"與賦之"麗"概念逐漸趨同,共同表現(xiàn)為對(duì)語(yǔ)言淺易化的追求,對(duì)音韻格律的重視,及對(duì)語(yǔ)言抒情的審美內(nèi)涵的重視。第五章則提出南朝辭賦的詩(shī)化,是辭賦對(duì)文學(xué)審美的主動(dòng)靠近,而非被動(dòng)的"被融合",辭賦句式具有強(qiáng)大的兼容內(nèi)化功能,南朝辭賦中仍舊包含的辭賦本質(zhì)特點(diǎn)。除此之外,從南朝同題詩(shī)賦創(chuàng)作角度入手,認(rèn)為詩(shī)賦在同題材的創(chuàng)作中并未完全趨同,有著自身的創(chuàng)作選擇和傾向。
[Abstract]:Poetry of ci Fu in the Southern Dynasty is an important issue in the study of ci Fu, which is closely related to the development of poetry in the Southern Dynasty. This paper studies the poetic style of ci fu in the Southern Dynasty, the first chapter of which goes back to the ideas of poetry creation in the pre-Qin and Han dynasties. It is found that ci Fu was influenced by poetry creation and Confucian poetry education in its origin and early creation, and then poetry took place for historical reasons. At the same time, it also explored the concept of "poetic". In the second chapter, the author points out that the difference between Sao style and Xiao Fu in form content is based on the classification of ci Fu, starting with the poetic style of Sao style and the poetic style of Xiao Fu. It is pointed out that the similarities between the Sao style and the small poetic style are reflected in the vulgarization of the poem lines in the five and seven characters and the themes of creation and the aesthetic appreciation of creation, while the differences in the poetic style are manifested in the fading out of the lyric subject and the change of the lyric way. In Xiaofu, there is a new change in the creation mode, that is, from the view of objects to the development of individual empathy. In the Southern Dynasty, the poetic expression of ci Fu is the introduction of five or seven words of poetry into Fu, and its internal representation is the convergence of the creative ideas and aesthetic thinking of poetry and Fu. Therefore, in the third chapter, this paper discusses the creation idea of poetry and Fu, and holds that poetry and Fu are influenced by Confucian poetry teaching "poetic aspiration" and the later "poetic fate" and "chanting sentiment" concept based on "poetic ambition". The situation in Sao body is gradually transitioning to artistic conception, and the characteristics of "body and object" of Xiao Fu develop into the construction of object boundary. Chapter 4th discusses the aesthetic thinking of poetry and Fu, and explores the development and enrichment of the meaning of "beauty" of poetry and Fu in the past dynasties. At the same time, it is pointed out that the concept of "Li" and "Li" of poetry gradually converge in practical creation and literary theory, which is shown by the pursuit of easiness of language and the emphasis on the rhythm of rhyme and rhyme. In Chapter 5th, it is pointed out that poetry of ci Fu in the Southern Dynasty is the active approach to literary aesthetics, rather than passive "being merged", and the sentence pattern of ci Fu has a strong compatible and internalized function. In addition, from the perspective of the poetry and Fu of the Southern Dynasty, the author thinks that poetry and Fu have not completely converged in the creation of the same subject matter, and have their own creative choice and tendency.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：I207.22

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曉秋;詠苔詩(shī)賦[J];閱讀與寫(xiě)作;1995年06期

2 趙逵夫;論講史傳統(tǒng)的流變與詩(shī)賦的正宗地位——韓高年《詩(shī)賦文體源流新探》序[J];西北成人教育學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

3 李娜;;由唐代詩(shī)賦看蹴鞠運(yùn)動(dòng)[J];體育文化導(dǎo)刊;2006年12期

4 張黎明;;庾信詩(shī)賦中“隱遁之念”辨析[J];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年04期

5 崔向榮;魏中林;;“欲麗前人”與魏晉詩(shī)賦摹擬觀念的嬗變[J];廣東社會(huì)科學(xué);2012年02期

6 祝鳳梧;庾信后期詩(shī)賦的美學(xué)特征[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1990年06期

7 朱建平;透視法在唐代詩(shī)賦中的運(yùn)用[J];常熟高專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

8 程平;;試論庾信后期詩(shī)賦的抒情特色[J];長(zhǎng)城;2010年02期

9 彭劭茹;;析宋代科舉時(shí)文——詩(shī)賦[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)刊;2011年17期

10 黃炳岡;;“唐賢今人詩(shī)賦”“多會(huì)于此”解釋的淺見(jiàn)[J];語(yǔ)文學(xué)習(xí);1987年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前6條

1 羅哲文 國(guó)家文物局古建筑專(zhuān)家組組長(zhǎng)、中國(guó)文物學(xué)會(huì)名譽(yù)會(huì)長(zhǎng);古建筑“流動(dòng)”著文化傳統(tǒng)[N];中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2010年

2 趙逵夫;論“講史”傳統(tǒng)的流變與詩(shī)賦的正宗地位[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

3 張?zhí)m軍;宋詞“密碼”在手作詩(shī)賦詞無(wú)憂?[N];連云港日?qǐng)?bào);2011年

4 本報(bào)記者 張俊梅;文物古跡是有形有神有聲有韻的文化存在[N];中國(guó)文物報(bào);2007年

5 楊念群;科舉與新學(xué)的扭結(jié)處[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報(bào);2014年

6 程印學(xué);中國(guó)古代文化繁榮的“導(dǎo)向”作用[N];光明日?qǐng)?bào);2004年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 李慧芳;漢代騷體詩(shī)賦研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2009年

2 王吉清;唐代的早期教育與文學(xué)[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王萌;庾信詩(shī)賦援引“三史”中人物研究[D];河北師范大學(xué);2015年

2 趙亮亮;張衡詩(shī)賦研究[D];渤海大學(xué);2015年

3 楊皓;論鮑照賦的特點(diǎn)與詩(shī)賦交互影響[D];東北師范大學(xué);2015年

4 阮婷;“詩(shī)賦取士”與唐前期政局[D];西北大學(xué);2015年

5 馬越;漢代詩(shī)賦飲食敘寫(xiě)研究[D];山東大學(xué);2016年

6 倪珂;陸云詩(shī)賦研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2016年

7 李青霞;南朝辭賦之詩(shī)化問(wèn)題探究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

8 夏侯南希;周履靖詩(shī)賦研究[D];浙江大學(xué);2015年

9 陳妮;先秦兩漢魏晉災(zāi)異詩(shī)賦研究[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2014年

10 李敏;漢初抒情詩(shī)賦的情思與表現(xiàn)[D];華僑大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1514516