本文關鍵詞：文學研究的創(chuàng)新仍應以文獻及其解讀為基礎——以李白與科舉相關問題為例的分析　出處：《文學評論》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

  更多相關文章： 李白 科舉 詩賦 開元二十三年 漏于屬籍

【摘要】：李白與科舉的關系眾說紛紜,可歸納為兩類,即性格說和身份說。本文將其劃分為三個時期論述,青少年時期為科舉準備階段,詩歌寫作對仗工整,有綺麗傾向,而投刺和獻詩,可視為準備過程中的行為。安陸十年,并沒有放棄科舉的努力,開元二十三年送人赴舉詩,實際上是李白自己的寫照,也是對自己的反思。其后,李白移家山東,走上另一條非科舉而入仕之路,以供奉翰林為歸結。李白放棄科舉的原因非性格所致,也不是曾為小吏或商人家庭,而是"漏于屬籍"。
[Abstract]:The relationship between Li Bai and Public opinions are divergent. examination, can be divided into two categories, namely, character and identity. This paper will be divided into three periods of adolescence, preparation for the imperial examination, writing poetry antithesis neat, beautiful and has a tendency to retire from public life and poetry, can be regarded as a behavior. In the process of preparing Anlu for ten years, and no give up the imperial efforts, Kaiyuan twenty-three years to give up poetry, is actually his portrayal of Li Bai, but also for their own reflection. Later, Li Bai moved to Shandong, embarked on another imperial examination in non Road, to worship is attributed. Li Bai gave up the imperial examination of non character caused, not once for the beadle or merchant family, but "leakage from the membership.

【作者單位】： 華南師范大學中文系;
【分類號】：I206.2
【正文快照】： 李白與科舉關系研究大致可歸納為兩類:其一是性格論;其二是身份論。性格論者以邏輯推理方法,印證主觀判斷,即李白性格豪放,不拘常規(guī),不屑于科舉(1)。而身份論者以文獻資料為基礎,從李白身份出發(fā),找出李白不能參加科舉考試的客觀條件(2)。雙方對于李白為何沒有參加科舉的解釋差，

本文編號：1405627