本文選題：文化消費(fèi) + 社會學(xué)　； 參考：《山東社會科學(xué)》2017年10期

【摘要】：通過回顧歐美文化消費(fèi)理論研究與經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究的文獻(xiàn),并與中國的已有成果比較,本文達(dá)成以下發(fā)現(xiàn):在主要發(fā)達(dá)國家,文化消費(fèi)是一個以社會學(xué)為主的跨學(xué)科研究領(lǐng)域。相比而言,國內(nèi)文化消費(fèi)研究涉及領(lǐng)域較狹窄,主要包括新聞出版業(yè)、影視業(yè)、互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)、文化藝術(shù)業(yè)、娛樂業(yè)、動漫業(yè)、影像業(yè);學(xué)科視野較單一、錯位、錯置,局限于傳媒學(xué)科、消費(fèi)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)和藝術(shù)學(xué),跨學(xué)科合作研究鮮見。傳播學(xué)意義上的"文化消費(fèi)"調(diào)查成果比較系統(tǒng),形成規(guī)模,但以文化消費(fèi)為主題的綜合性社會調(diào)查尚付闕如。兩相比較,國內(nèi)文化消費(fèi)的實(shí)證研究,著重所謂的"精神"文化消費(fèi),更多關(guān)注狹義的文化消費(fèi)層面,如讀書讀報(bào)、觀賞戲劇電影電視、瀏覽網(wǎng)絡(luò)、參觀博物館美術(shù)館等。很多研究忽略了教育、旅游、休閑等文化消費(fèi)的重要領(lǐng)域。國內(nèi)研究注重量的描述,輕視文化消費(fèi)的品質(zhì)——品味、不平等、意義與價值;對文化消費(fèi)品味的形成與社會變遷,文化消費(fèi)的群體差異與階層差異,文化消費(fèi)的多樣性、異質(zhì)性,人口社會經(jīng)濟(jì)特征在何種程度上影響人們的文化消費(fèi)活動,均缺乏重要的貢獻(xiàn),文化消費(fèi)的案例分析也乏善可陳。
[Abstract]:By reviewing the literature on cultural consumption theory and experience in Europe and America, and comparing with the existing achievements in China, this paper finds the following conclusions: in the main developed countries, cultural consumption is an interdisciplinary research field dominated by sociology. In contrast, domestic cultural consumption research involves a narrow range of fields, mainly including the press and publication industry, film and television industry, Internet industry, culture and art industry, entertainment industry, animation industry, video industry; the subject field of vision is relatively simple, misplaced, misplaced, Limited to the media discipline, consumer economics and art, cross-disciplinary cooperation research rarely seen. In the sense of communication, the survey results of "cultural consumption" are relatively systematic and form a scale, but the comprehensive social survey with the theme of cultural consumption is still lacking. In contrast, the empirical study of domestic cultural consumption focuses on the so-called "spiritual" cultural consumption, paying more attention to the narrow level of cultural consumption, such as reading newspapers, watching drama, movies and television, browsing the Internet, visiting museums and galleries, and so on. Many studies have neglected important areas of cultural consumption such as education, tourism and leisure. Domestic studies focus on the description of quantity, despise the quality of cultural consumption-taste, inequality, meaning and value, the formation of cultural consumption taste and social change, cultural consumption group differences and class differences, cultural consumption diversity, The heterogeneity, the social and economic characteristics of the population to what extent affect people's cultural consumption activities, lack of important contributions, cultural consumption of the case study is not good.
【作者單位】： 上海大學(xué)社會學(xué)系;
【基金】：國家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“文化消費(fèi)理論及其對當(dāng)代中國社會的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義研究”(項(xiàng)目編號:16ASH001)的階段性成果
【分類號】：G05

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李曉佼;趙海東;張又文;趙高晶;;文化產(chǎn)業(yè)與互聯(lián)網(wǎng)發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的相關(guān)性研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古科技與經(jīng)濟(jì);2013年15期

2 張恒山;;透視美國互聯(lián)網(wǎng)監(jiān)管的主要內(nèi)容和措施[J];中國出版;2010年13期

3 常凌，

本文編號：1980108