發(fā)布時間：2018-01-03 08:03

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：英語名詞化在中國英語專業(yè)碩士生畢業(yè)論文中的體現(xiàn)　出處：《南京師范大學》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 名詞化 語料庫 英語寫作 中國英語專業(yè)碩士生 專業(yè)的英語使用者

【摘要】：自1924年Jespersen對名詞化進行的第一次嘗試性研究起,不同的語言學流派對名詞化這一英語書面語的典型特征已作了數(shù)十年的研究。在所有名詞化理論中,系統(tǒng)功能視角的研究更深刻、更系統(tǒng),因為系統(tǒng)功能語法對名詞化的研究并不是局限于句法分析,而是通過名詞化與語法隱喻的聯(lián)系,將研究擴展到名詞化在書面英語中的語篇功能。自系統(tǒng)功能語法對名詞化的研究之后,一些定性研究和定量研究便以此為理論框架,對英語文本進行研究。定性研究主要詳細說明了名詞化在語篇中的作用,研究表明,名詞化的作用主要包括提高語篇的銜接性,客觀性,簡潔性,邏輯性,信息量,可信度,權(quán)威性,不可協(xié)商性等,這些功能恰恰證明了本研究的重要性,也為本研究的定性分析部分提供了理論支撐。 以往對名詞化的實證研究主要集中在名詞化的語類特征和中國學習者英語名詞化習得兩個方面。關(guān)于第一個方面的研究結(jié)論相對統(tǒng)一,即名詞化的出現(xiàn)頻率與文本的正式程度成正比。關(guān)于第二個方面的研究則不僅數(shù)量很有限,而且研究結(jié)論存在爭議。一些基于語料庫的研究(如,席2006 吳2009)證明,中國學習者和本族語者在使用名詞化方面存在顯著差異,而另一些研究(如,王陳2008)指出此差異并不顯著。另外,以往對名詞化的實證研究大多以中國本科生(包括英語專業(yè)與非英語專業(yè))為研究對象,語料主要由考試作文構(gòu)成,這說明他們的研究對象為英語學習者而非英語使用者,因此,本作者選擇英語專業(yè)的碩士生作為研究對象,選用他們的碩士畢業(yè)論文作為語料,因為他們作為碩士畢業(yè)論文的撰寫者,僅把英語作為一個語言工具,應被視作高層次的英語使用者。還有,以往的定量研究大部分都是基于專門選取的文本或者小型語料庫,所以很有必要用大型的語料庫作進一步研究,而本研究的語料大于以往任何一個基于語料庫的名詞化研究所使用的語料。 本研究所用的兩個語料由作者通過網(wǎng)上電子資源自建。語料CPEU由120篇選自英文核心期刊的學術(shù)期刊文章構(gòu)成,語料CPGT由120篇中國英語專業(yè)碩士生的畢業(yè)論文構(gòu)成。研究旨在回答以下兩個問題：1.中國英語專業(yè)碩士生作為高層次的英語使用者,他們在畢業(yè)論文中使用英語名詞化的水平是否已經(jīng)達到專業(yè)水準?2.理工類、外語類和綜合類院校的英語專業(yè)碩士生在畢業(yè)論文中使用名詞化方面是否存在差異?通過檢索軟件Wordsmith和描述分析軟件SPSS,本作者在專業(yè)的英語使用者和中國英語專業(yè)碩士生之間,以及中國英語專業(yè)碩士生內(nèi)部作了對比研究,并得出了以下結(jié)論： 在宏觀層面,中國英語專業(yè)碩士生在使用名詞化方面與專業(yè)的英語使用者存在顯著差異,并且中國英語專業(yè)碩士生使用名詞化的總數(shù)量大于專業(yè)的英語使用者；而微觀層面研究表明,中國英語專業(yè)碩士生對名詞化的這種過度使用源于對以-tion,-ness和-ance結(jié)尾的名詞化的過度使用,其過度使用原因有兩個,一是中國英語專業(yè)碩士生積極詞匯相對專業(yè)的英語使用者較小,導致他們對某些詞反復使用；二是某些畢業(yè)論文的話題導致文中多次重復出現(xiàn)某些詞。但第一個原因是主要原因。另外,微觀層面的研究還表明,中國英語專業(yè)碩士生對以-acy結(jié)尾的名詞化使用顯著不足,而對以-sion,-ment,-ence,-ity,-ery和-encv結(jié)尾的名詞化的使用已經(jīng)到達專業(yè)水平。還有,對所研究的10種名詞化基于量的排序顯示,兩個語料并無顯著差異。 對于來自不同類型院校的英語專業(yè)碩士生之間的內(nèi)部差異問題,本研究的結(jié)論是,在宏觀層面,外語類和綜合類院校英語專業(yè)碩士生在使用名詞化方面的水平高于理工類碩士生,因為顯著性檢驗表明,在使用名詞化的宏觀層面,外語類和綜合類類院校英語專業(yè)碩士生與專業(yè)的英語使用者并無顯著性差異,而理工類院校的英語專業(yè)碩士生與專業(yè)的英語使用者之間存在顯著差異。微觀層面的研究顯示,理工類院校英語專業(yè)碩士生與專業(yè)的英語使用者在三種名詞化的使用上差異顯著,而外語類和綜合類院校碩士生與專業(yè)的英語使用者只在兩種名詞化的使用上差異顯著。 本文的定性分析部分表明,名詞化在“質(zhì)”和“量”同樣重要,中國英語專業(yè)碩士生在名詞化的“質(zhì)”方面基本能做到正確合理使用。
[Abstract]:Since 1924, Jespersen of nominalization's first attempt of research, the typical characteristics of different schools of linguistics of English Nominalization the written language has been studied for several decades. In all nominalization theory, systemic functional perspective is more profound, more system, because of systemic functional grammar the research is not limited to syntactic parsing, but through nominalization with grammatical metaphor, will be extended to the study of textual functions of Nominalizations in written English. Since the study of systemic functional grammar, some qualitative and quantitative research is based on the theoretical framework of research on English text qualitatively. The main research details the role of Nominalization in discourse studies suggest that the role of nominalization mainly includes enhancing the cohesion, discourse, objectivity, simplicity, logic, information, credibility, authority These functions prove the importance of this study and provide theoretical support for the qualitative analysis of this study.
Two aspects of previous empirical studies on the nominalization mainly concentrated in the generic features of Nominalization and Chinese learners of English Nominalization acquisition. Relatively uniform conclusions about the first aspect, namely the formal degree of nominalization frequency and text is proportional. Research on second aspects is not only a very limited number. The conclusion of the study and controversy. Some corpus based study (e.g., 2006 seats Wu 2009) proved that China learners and native speakers have significant differences in the use of nominalization, and other studies (e.g., Wang Chen 2008) pointed out that this difference is not significant. In addition, previous empirical studies on the nominalization mostly Chinese undergraduate (including English Majors and non English majors) as the research object, the test corpus consists mainly of compositions, which shows their object of study for English learners and non English users, therefore, the The choice of English major postgraduates as the research object, use their master's thesis as the corpus, because they act as master of the graduation thesis writing, only to English as a language tool, should be regarded as high level English users. Also, most of the previous quantitative researches are specifically chosen texts or small based on the corpus, so it is necessary to further study with a large corpus, and the data of this study is larger than any previous use of nominalization based on corpus corpus.
Two corpora used in this study by the author through the electronic resources on the Internet. By 120 CPEU self built corpus from English core journals in academic journal articles, corpus CPGT composed of 120 China English Major Postgraduate graduation thesis. The research aims to answer the following two questions: 1. Chinese English major graduate students as high level English speakers, whether they use English Nominalization in the thesis has reached the level of professionalism? 2. science and engineering, foreign language classes and universities master English majors use nouns in graduation thesis of whether differences exist? By retrieval software Wordsmith and description analysis software SPSS, the author in between professional English users and Chinese English major graduate students, as well as the internal China English major graduate students made a comparative study, and draws the following conclusions:
At the macro level, China postgraduates majoring in English Nominalization and professional English users have significant differences, and the total number of Chinese English Major Postgraduate nominalization than professional English users; and the micro level studies show that China English majors master the nominalization from the excessive use of -tion, the excessive use of -ness and -ance at the end of the term, the excessive use of two reasons, one is the Chinese English Major Postgraduate active vocabulary relative professional English users is small, they lead to repeated use of certain words; the two is some graduation thesis topic leads to the repeated emergence of some words. But the first the reason is the main reason. In addition, the micro studies also showed that China English major graduates of nouns ending in -acy use significantly less than for -sion, -men The use of nominalization at the end of T, -ence, -ity, -ery and -encv has reached the professional level. Besides, there are no significant differences between the 10 nominalization based on quantity ranking, and two corpus.
For the problem of internal differences from different types of College English major postgraduate students, the conclusion of this study is, at the macro level, the level of English major postgraduate students in the use of Nominalization in foreign language classes and comprehensive colleges than science and engineering graduate students, because the results showed that at the macro level the use of the term. English speakers no foreign language classes and comprehensive college English major graduate students and professional significant differences, there are significant differences between the science and Engineering College English major graduate students and professional English users. Microscopic study shows that English Majors in Colleges of science and engineering, graduate students and professional English users in three Nominalization is significant, and the use of foreign language classes and class of Postgraduates in Colleges and professional English users in only two of nominalization are significant differences.
The qualitative part of this paper shows that nominalization is equally important in quality and quantity. Chinese English majors can basically make proper use of Nominalization in terms of quality.

【學位授予單位】：南京師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：H314

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳春明;;大學生英語寫作中的名詞化研究——基于語料庫的考察[J];瘋狂英語(教師版);2009年03期

2 文秋芳;俞希;;英語的國際化與本土化[J];國外外語教學;2003年03期

3 劉國輝;;動詞名化的兩性特征:動詞性與名詞性共存表征及其理據(jù)[J];國外外語教學;2007年03期

4 湯斌;;廣告語篇中的名詞化研究[J];國外外語教學;2007年03期

5 徐玉臣;;名詞化的生成機制、類型及功能的新視界[J];外語教學理論與實踐;2009年02期

6 高航;;概念物化與名詞化[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2007年06期

7 張文忠;楊士超;;中國學習者英語語料庫中動名搭配錯誤研究[J];解放軍外國語學院學報;2009年02期

8 范文芳,汪明杰;論三大流派對英語名詞化現(xiàn)象的研究[J];外語研究;2003年03期

9 程曉堂;名詞化與語用預設(shè)[J];外語研究;2003年03期

10 范文芳;名詞化隱喻的語篇銜接功能[J];外語研究;1999年01期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 劉春燕;中國學生對英語名物化的習得[D];江西師范大學;2002年

2 席緒慧;非英語專業(yè)學生英語作文中名詞化現(xiàn)象研究及其教學意義[D];華東師范大學;2006年

3 萬華;基于語料庫的高頻動詞搭配研究[D];上海外國語大學;2007年

4 阮洋;基于語料庫的科技英語中名詞化結(jié)構(gòu)及其概念功能分析[D];華中科技大學;2006年

5 嵇芳;中英文廣告語篇中名詞化的認知研究[D];蘇州大學;2008年

，

本文編號：1373057