【摘要】：民族之間、國(guó)家之間的觀念、文化的碰撞與滲透,是一個(gè)不可避免的歷史過(guò)程,也是社會(huì)發(fā)展、進(jìn)步不可缺少的力量源泉；一個(gè)民族、一個(gè)國(guó)家不能在碰撞與滲透中確立屬于民族自身的具有共同思想基礎(chǔ)的意識(shí),其走向衰落是必然的。而共同思想基礎(chǔ)的意識(shí),就是“觀念的上層建筑”——意識(shí)形態(tài)。隨著階級(jí)社會(huì)的發(fā)展,掌握意識(shí)形態(tài)控制權(quán)、維護(hù)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全,已成為一切國(guó)家執(zhí)政黨都普遍采取的統(tǒng)治手段,也是國(guó)家意志最常見(jiàn)、最直接的表達(dá)方式,目的就是使政黨始終成為意識(shí)形態(tài)領(lǐng)域“居高位者”。作為與西方資本主義國(guó)家意識(shí)形態(tài)觀截然不同的社會(huì)主義國(guó)家,我國(guó)長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),一直是西方一些國(guó)家特別是反華勢(shì)力進(jìn)行意識(shí)形態(tài)斗爭(zhēng)的重點(diǎn)目標(biāo)和主要敵人。它們通過(guò)經(jīng)貿(mào)往來(lái)、社會(huì)活動(dòng)、文化交流等途徑,向我國(guó)灌輸西方的政治制度、生活方式和行為規(guī)范,廣泛傳播所謂的“普世價(jià)值”,對(duì)普通民眾的理想信仰和價(jià)值觀念進(jìn)行滲透侵蝕,并有意丑化我國(guó)政府和社會(huì)形象,在意識(shí)形態(tài)領(lǐng)域?qū)ξ覈?guó)展開(kāi)了一場(chǎng)沒(méi)有硝煙的“軟性戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)”。特別是近年來(lái),西方一些國(guó)家依托其經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力強(qiáng)化其文化軟實(shí)力,憑借在現(xiàn)代傳媒上的壟斷地位,大肆對(duì)我國(guó)推行“文化帝國(guó)主義”,并根據(jù)我國(guó)社會(huì)的變化及時(shí)調(diào)整對(duì)策,使得當(dāng)前意識(shí)形態(tài)領(lǐng)域的斗爭(zhēng)與交鋒呈現(xiàn)出許多新的特點(diǎn)和新的動(dòng)向,意識(shí)形態(tài)安全面臨史無(wú)前例的嚴(yán)重威脅與嚴(yán)峻挑戰(zhàn),已成為關(guān)系我國(guó)生死存亡的重大現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。隨著信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的快速發(fā)展,特別是現(xiàn)代傳媒日漸普及,論壇、博客、微博、微信等得到廣泛運(yùn)用,傳統(tǒng)的媒體格局和輿論生態(tài)已經(jīng)發(fā)生根本性變化,自上而下的“中轉(zhuǎn)式”信息傳播已經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)樾畔⒃磁c受眾之間的“直接性傳播”現(xiàn)代傳媒信息量之巨、差異性之大、傳播速度之快、移動(dòng)性之強(qiáng),為維護(hù)我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全提供了堅(jiān)實(shí)的技術(shù)支撐、豐富的信息資源、高效的工具手段、創(chuàng)新的工作方法,拓展了我國(guó)主流意識(shí)形態(tài)的傳播途徑和空間,提高了廣大民眾對(duì)主流與非主流意識(shí)形態(tài)的鑒別力,有利于強(qiáng)化中國(guó)特色社會(huì)主義理論在世界的傳播力和影響力,為維護(hù)我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全創(chuàng)造了有力的土壤和條件。但同時(shí),隨著現(xiàn)代傳媒的廣泛運(yùn)用,國(guó)家對(duì)社會(huì)民眾思想的引導(dǎo)難度明顯增大,對(duì)社會(huì)輿論的控制力度明顯減弱,西方價(jià)值體系對(duì)我國(guó)社會(huì)主義核心價(jià)值體系的滲透力度明顯增強(qiáng),良莠不齊的西方價(jià)值觀借助現(xiàn)代傳媒的平臺(tái)大量涌入我國(guó),使得廣大民眾的價(jià)值觀念普遍受到不小的沖擊和影響,致使社會(huì)出現(xiàn)了思想意識(shí)多元化、價(jià)值取向多樣化等問(wèn)題,極大影響了我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)文化和馬克思主義理論的感召力和影響力,意識(shí)形態(tài)安全風(fēng)險(xiǎn)系數(shù)顯著提升。因此,在系統(tǒng)分析梳理中外意識(shí)形態(tài)安全理論,特別是當(dāng)代中國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全觀的基礎(chǔ)上,客觀準(zhǔn)確判斷現(xiàn)代傳媒條件下我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全的現(xiàn)狀,深入研究現(xiàn)代傳媒對(duì)我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全產(chǎn)生的積極影響與負(fù)面因素,有針對(duì)性地提出維護(hù)我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全需要堅(jiān)持的指導(dǎo)思想和基本原則,積極探索維護(hù)我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全的可行方法路徑和防范體制機(jī)制,對(duì)有效抵御和對(duì)抗西方敵對(duì)勢(shì)力意識(shí)形態(tài)的滲透和破壞,鞏固黨的執(zhí)政地位,具有重大而現(xiàn)實(shí)的意義。
[Abstract]:The collision and infiltration of ideas and cultures among nations is an unavoidable historical process and an indispensable source of strength for social development and progress. Ideology, the superstructure of ideas, is the same ideological foundation. With the development of the class society, mastering the control of ideology and maintaining the security of ideology have become the dominant means adopted by all the ruling parties in the country, and the most common and direct expression of the will of the state. The purpose is to keep the party in power all the time. As a socialist country which is totally different from the ideology of the western capitalist countries, China has long been the key target and main enemy of the ideological struggle of some western countries, especially the anti-China forces, through economic and trade exchanges, social activities and cultural exchanges. By instilling Western political systems, lifestyles and behavioral norms into China, disseminating widely the so-called "universal values", infiltrating and eroding ordinary people's ideals, beliefs and values, and deliberately disfiguring the image of our government and society, a "soft war" was launched in the ideological field against China without gunpowder smoke. Especially in recent years, some western countries rely on their economic strength to strengthen their cultural soft power, rely on their monopoly position in the modern media, wantonly promote "cultural imperialism" to our country, and adjust the countermeasures according to the changes of our society in time, which makes the current ideological struggle and confrontation show many new characteristics. With the rapid development of information network technology, especially the increasing popularity of modern media, forums, blogs, micro-blogs and micro-letters have been widely used, and the traditional media structure and public opinion ecology have been widely used. Fundamental changes have taken place, and the top-down "transitional" information dissemination has transformed into the "direct dissemination" of modern media between information sources and audiences, which provides a solid technical support and rich information resources for the maintenance of Ideological Security in China. Efficient tools and innovative working methods have expanded the channels and space for the dissemination of the mainstream ideology in China, enhanced the public's discrimination between the mainstream and non-mainstream ideology, strengthened the dissemination and influence of the theory of socialism with Chinese characteristics in the world, and created a powerful force for maintaining the security of our ideology. But at the same time, with the widespread use of modern media, the state's guiding difficulty to the public's ideology has increased significantly, and the control of public opinion has weakened significantly. The penetration of the Western value system into China's socialist core value system has increased significantly, and the uneven Western values have resorted to the peace of modern media. The influx of Taiwan into China has greatly impacted and influenced the values of the broad masses of the people, resulting in the diversification of ideology and value orientation, greatly affecting the appeal and influence of traditional Chinese culture and Marxist theory, and significantly raising the risk factor of ideological security. On the basis of systematically analyzing and sorting out the ideology security theories at home and abroad, especially the ideology security concept of contemporary China, this paper objectively and accurately judges the present situation of ideology security in China under the condition of modern media, deeply studies the positive and negative factors that modern media has exerted on ideology security in China, and puts forward some suggestions to safeguard myself. It is of great and realistic significance for us to effectively resist and resist the infiltration and destruction of the ideology of the hostile forces in the West and consolidate the Party's ruling position by adhering to the guiding ideology and basic principles of national ideological security and actively exploring the feasible ways and preventive mechanisms to safeguard our ideological security.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：D64

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 托馬斯·邁爾,郭業(yè)洲,陳林;熱話題與冷思考(十六)——關(guān)于媒體社會(huì)中政黨政治的對(duì)話[J];當(dāng)代世界與社會(huì)主義;2000年04期

2 黃旭東;;意識(shí)形態(tài)建設(shè)與國(guó)家安全維護(hù)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年07期

3 強(qiáng)以華;價(jià)值觀多元化芻議[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

4 袁三標(biāo);;從軟實(shí)力看當(dāng)代中國(guó)國(guó)家意識(shí)形態(tài)安全[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年03期

5 黃建明,杜阿奇;積極構(gòu)建我國(guó)意識(shí)形態(tài)安全體系[J];湖北行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

6 王水雄;;論制度變遷中的意識(shí)形態(tài)安全[J];江海學(xué)刊;2007年01期

7 劉少杰;;現(xiàn)代化、后現(xiàn)代化與全球化的意識(shí)形態(tài)研究——西方社會(huì)學(xué)意識(shí)形態(tài)研究的歷史演化[J];江海學(xué)刊;2010年04期

8 解松;;社會(huì)思潮與我國(guó)國(guó)家意識(shí)形態(tài)安全[J];江南社會(huì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

9 吳玉榮;在虛擬空間唱響社會(huì)主義意識(shí)形態(tài)的主旋律[J];科學(xué)社會(huì)主義;2004年04期

10 吳丹;;現(xiàn)代傳媒視域下的國(guó)家文化安全研究[J];學(xué)理論;2010年08期

，

本文編號(hào)：2210525