本文選題：高�？锒�(jí) + 學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)　； 參考：《華中師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：以三大文摘和人大復(fù)印報(bào)刊資料為研究對(duì)象,梳理高校對(duì)這些刊物分級(jí)的情況,對(duì)影響高校將其作為學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)并定級(jí)的相關(guān)因素進(jìn)行研究。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn):刊物摘轉(zhuǎn)論文的學(xué)術(shù)水平、刊物的學(xué)術(shù)聲譽(yù)與傳播效應(yīng)以及為不同學(xué)科論文提供可比的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),是高校將其作為學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的重要依據(jù),而刊物間水平的差異是影響高校決定刊物級(jí)別的主要因素。高校對(duì)社科文摘與轉(zhuǎn)載類(lèi)刊物定級(jí),有利于促進(jìn)高校教師提高論文學(xué)術(shù)水平、促進(jìn)學(xué)術(shù)論文的傳播和影響力、促進(jìn)原發(fā)刊物提高辦刊質(zhì)量。但也致使某種類(lèi)型和有些學(xué)科的論文不易被轉(zhuǎn)載,一些學(xué)者和刊物為求轉(zhuǎn)載迎合這類(lèi)刊物的偏好,一定程度導(dǎo)致學(xué)術(shù)研究的浮躁之風(fēng)。為此,高校要充分認(rèn)識(shí)社科文摘與轉(zhuǎn)載類(lèi)刊物學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)功能的有限性,制定與學(xué)科性質(zhì)相適應(yīng)的學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)制度,并建立學(xué)術(shù)評(píng)價(jià)的監(jiān)督和誠(chéng)信機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:Taking three abstracts and copies of newspaper and periodicals as the object of study, this paper combs the classification of these publications in colleges and universities, and studies the relevant factors that affect the academic evaluation index and grading of colleges and universities. The results show that the academic level of the selected papers, the academic reputation and dissemination effect of the journals, and the comparable evaluation criteria for the papers in different disciplines are the important basis for colleges and universities to regard them as academic evaluation indicators. The difference in the level of journals is the main factor that affects the level of journals in colleges and universities. The classification of social science abstracts and reprinted publications in colleges and universities is conducive to promoting the academic level of academic papers, promoting the dissemination and influence of academic papers, and improving the quality of the original publications. But it also makes the papers of certain types and some disciplines difficult to be reprinted. Some scholars and journals cater to the preference of such publications to a certain extent, which leads to the impetuous trend of academic research. Therefore, colleges and universities should fully understand the limitation of academic evaluation function of social science abstracts and reprinted publications, formulate academic evaluation system adapted to the nature of the subject, and establish the supervision and honesty mechanism of academic evaluation.
【作者單位】： 廈門(mén)大學(xué)高等教育發(fā)展研究中心;廈門(mén)大學(xué)教育研究院;天津大學(xué)教育學(xué)院;
【基金】：中央高�；究蒲袠I(yè)務(wù)費(fèi)華中師范大學(xué)教育信息化協(xié)同創(chuàng)新中心資助項(xiàng)目“信息化與教育治理現(xiàn)代化”(CCNU16LPH002)
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：+
，

本文編號(hào)：1883767