【摘要】：行政訴訟政策在行政訴訟司法實踐中廣泛存在,并從實質(zhì)上深刻的影響著行政訴訟,但是目前學(xué)界對這一現(xiàn)象少有研究。作者界定了行政訴訟政策的概念,分析了其存在的必然性,梳理了進(jìn)入司法實踐的途徑,并以行政首長出庭應(yīng)訴為例研究其作為行政訴訟政策的演變過程,為加深對行政訴訟政策的理解、拓展行政訴訟政策的觀察分析視野起到了一定的積極作用。作者通過對法律、政策、法律政策、司法政策等概念進(jìn)行梳理和界定,對行政訴訟政策的概念進(jìn)行了界定,提出行政訴訟政策是國家處理行政訴訟問題的一種導(dǎo)向或立場、態(tài)度,是黨和國家、人大及其常委會、法院和檢察院在一定階段為實現(xiàn)特定目標(biāo)而對行政訴訟的一種態(tài)度,或采取的行為準(zhǔn)則、指南。并對行政訴訟政策的特征和表現(xiàn)形式進(jìn)行了分析。行政訴訟政策的存在,不是偶然的人為的現(xiàn)象,而是多種原因造成的必然性的存在。作者對行政訴訟政策存在的必然性進(jìn)行了分析,其中包括歷史的基因、經(jīng)濟(jì)社會發(fā)展的需要和我國當(dāng)下的司法制度的困境。行政訴訟政策進(jìn)入司法實踐的途徑研究也是行政訴訟政策的重要組成部分,主要有三種途徑:法律形式、司法解釋或司法文件以及法官在審判過程中的價值判斷。行政首長出庭應(yīng)訴作為中國特色法治建設(shè)的探索,是一項典型的行政訴訟政策。行政首長出庭應(yīng)訴是指行政相對人依法向人民法院提起行政訴訟,被訴行政機(jī)關(guān)的負(fù)責(zé)人出庭應(yīng)訴答辯的一項訴訟制度。該制度經(jīng)歷了從地方創(chuàng)舉到國家認(rèn)可、從“良性違法”到被納入法律、從行政推動到司法推動的演變過程,在運(yùn)行過程中實現(xiàn)了從實質(zhì)上解決行政糾紛的目的。最后,作者從制度的發(fā)展的角度,結(jié)合國情和法治社會發(fā)展對行政訴訟政策進(jìn)行了展望。
[Abstract]:Administrative litigation policy exists widely in the judicial practice of administrative litigation, and has a profound influence on administrative litigation in essence, but there is little research on this phenomenon in academic circles at present. The author defines the concept of administrative litigation policy, analyzes the inevitability of its existence, combs the ways of entering judicial practice, and studies the evolution process of administrative litigation policy by taking the chief executive to appear in court as an example. In order to deepen the understanding of administrative litigation policy, expand the observation and analysis vision of administrative litigation policy has played a positive role. Through combing and defining the concepts of law, policy, law policy, judicial policy and so on, the author defines the concept of administrative litigation policy, and points out that administrative litigation policy is a direction or stand for the state to deal with administrative litigation problems. Attitude, is the party and the state, the people's Congress and its standing Committee, the courts and procuratorates in a certain stage in order to achieve specific goals and administrative proceedings, or adopt a code of conduct, guidelines. And to the administrative litigation policy characteristic and the expression form has carried on the analysis. The existence of administrative litigation policy is not accidental man-made phenomenon, but the existence of inevitability caused by many reasons. The author analyzes the inevitability of the existence of administrative litigation policy, including the historical genes, the needs of economic and social development and the plight of the current judicial system in China. The research on the way of administrative litigation policy entering into judicial practice is also an important part of administrative litigation policy, there are three main ways: legal form, judicial interpretation or judicial documents, and judges' value judgment in the process of trial. As an exploration of the construction of the rule of law with Chinese characteristics, it is a typical administrative litigation policy for the chief executive to appear in court. The chief executive appearing in court is a lawsuit system in which the administrative counterpart brings administrative litigation to the people's court according to law, and the person in charge of the sued administrative organ appears in court to answer the lawsuit. The system has experienced the evolution from local innovation to national recognition, from "benign violation" to being incorporated into law, from administrative promotion to judicial promotion, and has realized the aim of resolving administrative disputes in essence in the course of operation. Finally, the author looks forward to the administrative litigation policy from the point of view of the development of the system, combined with the national conditions and the development of the society ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 付楊;論我國的行政訴訟政策[D];鄭州大學(xué);2017年

2 李凌云;行政訴訟立案制度研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2017年

3 王景山;政府信息不存在案件法律問題探析[D];廣西大學(xué);2017年

，

本文編號：2469417