本文選題：“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則 + 網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者　； 參考：《河北師范大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著社會經(jīng)濟(jì)的不斷提高,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)得到了空前的發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)成為傳播信息最重要的渠道,著作權(quán)的保護(hù)也延伸到這一新興領(lǐng)域。雖然互聯(lián)網(wǎng)成為各國對外交流的重要手段,在信息傳播和資源利用方面表現(xiàn)出了極大的優(yōu)越性,但由此帶來的網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛也頻繁發(fā)生。如何更好的保護(hù)著作權(quán)人的利益,適應(yīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)的發(fā)展需要,在既不違背開放、共享的“互聯(lián)網(wǎng)精神”,又能明確規(guī)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者應(yīng)該承擔(dān)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任,使信息共享與網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)保護(hù)之間實(shí)現(xiàn)利益平衡,成為目前立法者制定網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)相關(guān)法律法規(guī)的新挑戰(zhàn)。當(dāng)今社會,網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)的內(nèi)容與形式變化多樣,近幾年以來,由于網(wǎng)絡(luò)高科技的飛速發(fā)展,我國各地法院涌入了大量與網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)相關(guān)的侵權(quán)糾紛,在這種情況下,對網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者的責(zé)任承擔(dān)和法律地位如何認(rèn)定成為了網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)糾紛中的焦點(diǎn),其中最典型的網(wǎng)絡(luò)侵權(quán)糾紛就是侵犯著作權(quán)中的信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)。本文通過對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的法律適用進(jìn)行論述,以解決當(dāng)下網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的問題,完善我國網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)的相關(guān)立法。自20世紀(jì)90年代以來,隨著互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的飛速發(fā)展,網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛進(jìn)入了司法領(lǐng)域。早在1998年,美國出臺的《千禧年數(shù)字版權(quán)法》(以下簡稱DMCA)中就對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則作出了規(guī)定。其中規(guī)定了網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在符合一定條件下,就不需要承擔(dān)侵權(quán)賠償責(zé)任,這也為當(dāng)時(shí)法官審理網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)案件提供了法律依據(jù),成為了訴訟中網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者進(jìn)行抗辯的重要理由。《千禧年數(shù)字版權(quán)法》從網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任的角度進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,既為互聯(lián)網(wǎng)產(chǎn)業(yè)營造了一個(gè)良好的發(fā)展空間,又極大的保護(hù)了著作權(quán)人的利益。我國立法中對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的規(guī)定,大多也都是借鑒了美國DMCA的立法模式,目前,頒布了一系列關(guān)于解決網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的法律法規(guī)及司法解釋,以確認(rèn)網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者在何種情況下承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任,具備什么條件時(shí)可以免責(zé)。雖然我國法律對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則進(jìn)行了規(guī)定,但相關(guān)著作權(quán)立法并不完善,法律適用過程中依然存在很多問題,有待我們進(jìn)一步解決。本文主要通過以下五個(gè)部分對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的法律適用進(jìn)行論述:第一部分,主要通過引入典型案例,對案例進(jìn)行介紹和分析,引出“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則,并總結(jié)案例帶給我們的啟示,指出該規(guī)則在我國相關(guān)著作權(quán)立法中的規(guī)定,以及目前在司法實(shí)踐中如何被適用。第二部分,介紹了“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的含義,并對規(guī)則的由來作了闡述,主要是網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者承擔(dān)侵權(quán)責(zé)任歸責(zé)形式的演變,同時(shí)分析了“紅旗標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”作為“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的例外,在司法實(shí)踐中如何被適用,以及“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的價(jià)值意義。第三部分,主要從國內(nèi)外對“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的立法現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析,介紹了美國《千禧年數(shù)字版權(quán)法》中的具體規(guī)定,并對我國頒布的相關(guān)網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)立法進(jìn)行介紹,找出法律中存在的問題。第四部分,主要闡述了“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的適用條件,包括主觀條件和客觀條件,通過圍繞《信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)保護(hù)條例》的條文規(guī)定進(jìn)行論述,指出了為準(zhǔn)確認(rèn)定網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)提供者應(yīng)該承擔(dān)的侵權(quán)責(zé)任,就應(yīng)對條文中涉及的不明確的概念進(jìn)行司法解釋,并作出細(xì)致規(guī)定。第五部分,主要針對存在的問題,提出“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則的完善建議,并通過對網(wǎng)絡(luò)著作權(quán)相關(guān)立法的完善,來更好的解決“避風(fēng)港”規(guī)則在我國司法實(shí)踐的適用中遇到的問題。
[Abstract]:With the continuous improvement of the social economy, the Internet industry has been developing unprecedentedly. The network has become the most important channel for disseminating information, and the protection of copyright extends to this emerging field. Although the Internet has become an important means to communicate with other countries, the Internet has shown great superiority in information dissemination and resource utilization. The network copyright infringement disputes also occur frequently. How to better protect the interests of the copyright owners and adapt to the development of the network technology, neither violates the openness, the shared "Internet spirit", and clearly stipulates the infringement responsibility that the network service providers should undertake, so that the information sharing and the network copyright protection are real. Nowadays, the balance of interests has become a new challenge for the legislator to formulate the laws and regulations related to the network copyright. Nowadays, the content and form of network services have varied. In recent years, due to the rapid development of the network high-tech, the courts of China have poured into a large number of infringement disputes related to the right of network work, and in this case, the network is on the network. The responsibility of service providers and how to identify the legal status have become the focus of the network infringement disputes. The most typical network infringement dispute is the infringement of the right of information network communication in the copyright. This article discusses the legal application of the "haven" rules to solve the current network service providers' liability for infringement. Since 1990s, with the rapid development of the Internet, the network copyright infringement disputes have entered the judicial field since 1990s. As early as in 1998, the "Millennium digital copyright law" (hereinafter referred to as DMCA) issued by the United States has made a provision for the "haven" rules. In accordance with certain conditions, the collateral service providers do not have to bear the liability for tort, which provides the legal basis for the judges to hear the infringement of the network copyright infringement cases at that time. It has become an important reason for the network service provider to defend the defense in the lawsuit. It provides a good development space for the Internet industry and a great protection of the interests of the copyright owners. In our legislation, the regulations of the "haven" are mostly used for reference to the legislative model of DMCA in the United States. At present, a series of laws and regulations to solve the copyright infringement of network are issued. It is explained in order to confirm the circumstances under which the network service provider is responsible for tort and what conditions it can be disclaimed. Although the law of our country stipulates the rules of the "harbor", the relevant copyright legislation is not perfect, and there are still many problems in the process of law application, which need to be further solved. This article mainly passes through The following five sections discuss the legal application of the "haven" rules: in the first part, the introduction and analysis of the cases are introduced mainly through the introduction of typical cases, the rules of the "haven" are introduced, and the inspiration from the case is summed up, and the regulations in the relevant legislation of the relevant work in China and the current judicial practice are pointed out. The second part introduces the meaning of the rule of the "haven" and expounds the origin of the rules, mainly the evolution of the network service provider's liability for the liability for tort, and the exception of the "Red Flag Standard" as a "haven" rule, how to apply in the judicial practice, and the "haven" The value meaning of the rule. The third part, mainly from the analysis of the legislative status of the "haven" rules at home and abroad, introduced the specific provisions of the United States "the Millennium digital copyright law", and introduced the relevant network copyright legislation promulgated in China, and found out the problems in the law. The fourth part mainly expounded the "shelter port". The applicable conditions of the rules, including subjective and objective conditions, are discussed through the provisions of the provisions of the regulations on the protection of the right to transmission of information network. It points out the tort liability for the accurate identification of the network service providers, and makes judicial interpretations of the ambiguous concepts involved in the provisions and makes detailed provisions. Fifth In the part, this paper mainly aims at the existing problems, and puts forward the suggestions for the improvement of the "haven" rules. And through the improvement of the relevant legislation of the network copyright, we can better solve the problems encountered in the application of the "haven" rules in the judicial practice of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D923.41

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 胡開忠;;“避風(fēng)港規(guī)則”在視頻分享網(wǎng)站版權(quán)侵權(quán)認(rèn)定中的適用[J];法學(xué);2009年12期

，

本文編號：1971709