發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-30 12:06

  本文選題：家事 + 家事事件��； 參考：《河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：家庭是由婚姻、血緣、或收養(yǎng)關(guān)系所組成的社會(huì)生活的基本單位。家庭的成立是以婚姻、血緣和收養(yǎng)三種關(guān)系為基礎(chǔ)而構(gòu)成,在相同的屋檐下共同生活,彼此互動(dòng),是意識(shí)、情感交流與互助的整合體。家庭關(guān)系是指存在于家庭成員之間的、為法律所確認(rèn)并賦予權(quán)利、義務(wù)內(nèi)容的法律關(guān)系。家庭關(guān)系是構(gòu)成家事事件的基礎(chǔ)。家事是指家庭的事情。家事事件是指存在家庭關(guān)系的家庭成員之間產(chǎn)生的身份或者財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系糾紛的事件。家事糾紛是指婚姻家庭領(lǐng)域因婚姻、親子、收養(yǎng)、同居等涉及感情關(guān)系引起的身份關(guān)系或財(cái)產(chǎn)關(guān)系上的權(quán)利義務(wù)爭議。家事糾紛與一般的民事糾紛有所不同,大多數(shù)民事糾紛都涉及財(cái)產(chǎn)糾紛,而家事糾紛則大多只涉及到個(gè)人的身份權(quán)等私權(quán),而且家事糾紛的當(dāng)事人之間一般以家庭關(guān)系為紐帶而相互牽連,當(dāng)事人之間會(huì)存在血緣關(guān)系或者婚姻關(guān)系。這些因素也使家事糾紛的解決在關(guān)注個(gè)人權(quán)利的同時(shí)具有了一些社會(huì)公共利益的性質(zhì),決定了家事糾紛的解決程序不同于一般的民事訴訟程序。我國現(xiàn)實(shí)實(shí)踐中并未設(shè)立專門的家事審判程序,家事案件的審理程序基本上適用一般的民事案件審理程序。這種審理模式下就沒有真正的考慮到家事案件本身具有的特殊性。我國沒有設(shè)立統(tǒng)一的家事實(shí)體法,相關(guān)的規(guī)定分散見于《婚姻法》、《收養(yǎng)法》、《繼承法》等法律中,家事事件的適用程序依照《民事訴訟法》及相關(guān)的司法解釋,對家事事件進(jìn)行統(tǒng)一分類,將家事事件有關(guān)法律從一般民事訴訟法和其他法律中摘錄出來進(jìn)行整合,適用于家事事件的獨(dú)立程序值得探討。在家事案件的適用程序上,應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮家事訴訟事件與一般民事訴訟事件的異同。在家事事件的審理上應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循職權(quán)主義原則、不公開審理原則、統(tǒng)合處理原則和調(diào)解原則。在家事審判程序的構(gòu)建上,應(yīng)當(dāng)對家事案件進(jìn)行專門分類,建立家事法庭,家事案件應(yīng)當(dāng)由專業(yè)的家事法官進(jìn)行審理,設(shè)立專門的家事調(diào)查員對家事案件調(diào)查取證,在家事案件的審理中,應(yīng)當(dāng)明確實(shí)行強(qiáng)制調(diào)解前置程序,建立規(guī)范的法院調(diào)解程序,設(shè)立具有相應(yīng)專門知識(shí)的家事調(diào)解員。在家事案件的審理過程中,應(yīng)當(dāng)注重家事案件中第三人權(quán)益的實(shí)質(zhì)保障,構(gòu)建檢察機(jī)關(guān)以公訴人、法律監(jiān)督者或者公益代表人的身份參與家事訴訟的模式。
[Abstract]:The family is the basic unit of social life consisting of marriage, blood, or adoption. The establishment of family is based on marriage, blood and adoption, living together under the same roof and interacting with each other. It is the integration of consciousness, emotional communication and mutual assistance. Family relationship refers to the legal relationship between family members which is recognized by law and endowed with rights and obligations. Family relations form the basis of family affairs. Family matters refer to family matters. Family events refer to the disputes of identity or property between family members who have family relations. Family disputes refer to the disputes of rights and obligations in the field of marriage, parenthood, adoption, cohabitation and so on, which are related to the relationship of identity or property in the field of marriage and family. Family disputes are different from ordinary civil disputes. Most civil disputes involve property disputes, while family disputes are mostly related to private rights such as personal identity rights. And the parties to a family dispute are usually related to each other by family relationship, and there will be blood relationship or marriage relationship between the parties. These factors also make the settlement of family disputes have the nature of social public interest while paying close attention to individual rights, which determines that the procedure of resolving family disputes is different from the ordinary civil procedure. In our country, there is no special family trial procedure in practice, and the trial procedure of family case is basically applicable to the general civil case trial procedure. This trial mode does not really take into account the particularity of the family case itself. There is no unified substantive law on family matters in our country. The relevant provisions are scattered in the Marriage Law, the Adoption Law, the inheritance Law, and other laws. The procedure for the application of family matters is in accordance with the Civil procedure Law and the relevant judicial interpretations. It is worth discussing the independent procedure which is applicable to the family affairs, such as the unified classification of the family affairs and the integration of the relevant laws of the family affairs from the general civil procedure law and other laws. In the application procedure of family case, we should consider the similarities and differences between family action and general civil action. In the trial of family affairs, we should abide by the principle of authority, the principle of closed trial, the principle of integrated handling and the principle of mediation. In the construction of family trial procedure, family cases should be specially classified, family courts should be established, family cases should be heard by professional family judges, and special family investigators should be set up to investigate and obtain evidence from family cases. In the trial of family cases, compulsory mediation procedures should be clearly implemented, standardized court mediation procedures should be established, and family mediators with corresponding expertise should be set up. In the trial of family cases, we should pay attention to the substantive protection of the rights and interests of the third party in the family cases, and construct a model for procuratorial organs to participate in family litigation as public prosecutors, legal supervisors or public interest representatives.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D925.1;D923.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王韻潔;;臺(tái)灣“家事事件法”及其啟示[J];河北法學(xué);2016年07期

2 湯鳴;;家事糾紛法院調(diào)解實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2016年01期

3 蔣月;馮源;;臺(tái)灣家事審判制度的改革及其啟示——以“家事事件法”為中心[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年05期

4 何燕;;論少年家事法庭的建構(gòu)——一種中國式路徑的思考[J];煙臺(tái)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2014年03期

5 許少波;;家事糾紛類型化分析[J];江海學(xué)刊;2014年03期

6 曾瓊;;婚姻家事案件對訴訟程序的特殊需求[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2009年06期

7 張曉茹;;我國應(yīng)設(shè)立家事事件程序[J];法律適用;2006年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1955243