發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-03 04:02

  本文選題：經(jīng)常居所地 + 屬人法�。� 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：經(jīng)常居所地作為屬人法的新興連結(jié)點(diǎn),最早出現(xiàn)于海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議制定的公約。經(jīng)海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議的提倡,經(jīng)常居所地逐漸被各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法引入,部分替代國(guó)籍國(guó)或者住所地法,成為新的屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn),并運(yùn)用于合同、侵權(quán)等屬人法之外的領(lǐng)域。但如何對(duì)其進(jìn)行認(rèn)定,國(guó)際條約中沒有規(guī)定統(tǒng)一的標(biāo)準(zhǔn),各國(guó)立法和實(shí)踐也不盡相同。通過對(duì)其發(fā)展歷史、運(yùn)用情況、各國(guó)認(rèn)定實(shí)踐進(jìn)行考察和梳理,明確經(jīng)常居所地作為屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的地位,以及對(duì)其準(zhǔn)確界定的重要性,參考各國(guó)立法和實(shí)踐確定的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),結(jié)合我國(guó)立法和司法實(shí)踐,發(fā)現(xiàn)其中存在的問題,針對(duì)性得提出改善建議。文章主要運(yùn)用歷史研究、比較研究和案例研究的方法。通過梳理屬人法的認(rèn)定歷史,明確經(jīng)常居所地產(chǎn)生的背景和意義。繼而通過比較海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議制定的公約和歐盟國(guó)際私法條例、英美法系和大陸法系各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)立法中經(jīng)常居所地的運(yùn)用情況,對(duì)經(jīng)常居所地作為屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的地位和重要性形成清晰的認(rèn)識(shí)。海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議制定的部分公約在實(shí)施過程中,部分成員國(guó)積累了豐富的司法實(shí)踐,尤其是《兒童誘拐公約》成員國(guó)對(duì)兒童經(jīng)常居所地的界定實(shí)踐豐富,不同國(guó)家的界定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不同。歐盟條例也類似,相關(guān)實(shí)踐也主要集中于婚姻家庭領(lǐng)域。除了對(duì)條約適用實(shí)踐進(jìn)行對(duì)比介紹,英美法系國(guó)家有關(guān)經(jīng)常居所地的認(rèn)定也體現(xiàn)在司法實(shí)踐中,通過分析不同的司法案例,進(jìn)而總結(jié)出各國(guó)認(rèn)定經(jīng)常居所地的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和考量因素。文章第一章是對(duì)屬人法認(rèn)定歷史的梳理和經(jīng)常居所地運(yùn)用情況的考察,通過對(duì)屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的歷史沿革和海牙國(guó)際私法會(huì)議制定的公約、歐盟國(guó)際私法條約、各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)立法中涉及經(jīng)常居所地作為連結(jié)點(diǎn)的條款進(jìn)行介紹,明晰了經(jīng)常居所地作為屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的起源和發(fā)展,以及在國(guó)際條約和各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法中的運(yùn)用情況。第二章以比較法的視角分析經(jīng)常居所地的認(rèn)定,從國(guó)際公約的實(shí)施到各國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)的立法和實(shí)踐,展現(xiàn)了經(jīng)常居所地的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn),特別考慮了兒童經(jīng)常居所地的界定,從海牙《兒童誘拐公約》的實(shí)踐中可看出與成人經(jīng)常居所地界定的不同。除此之外,大陸法系和英美法系國(guó)家在界定這一概念時(shí)也有些許不同。第三章立足于我國(guó)關(guān)于經(jīng)常居所地認(rèn)定的立法和司法實(shí)踐,主要介紹了我國(guó)屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的歷史沿革,以及經(jīng)常居所地在現(xiàn)行立法中作為連結(jié)點(diǎn)的地位,并圍繞現(xiàn)行法律和司法解釋有關(guān)經(jīng)常居所地的規(guī)定在實(shí)踐中的適用情況展開討論,以兩個(gè)案例展現(xiàn)了準(zhǔn)確適用相關(guān)規(guī)定的重要性。第四章結(jié)合其他國(guó)家界定經(jīng)常居所地的立法和實(shí)踐,針對(duì)我國(guó)立法和司法實(shí)踐中認(rèn)定經(jīng)常居所地存在的問題,提出了相應(yīng)的建議,特別說明了單獨(dú)確立兒童經(jīng)常居所地的認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的重要性。
[Abstract]:As a new link of personal law, the place of habitual residence first appeared in the convention made by the Hague Conference on Private International Law. As advocated by the Hague Conference on Private International Law, the place of permanent residence is gradually introduced into the domestic law of various countries, partly replacing the law of nationality or domicile, becoming a new personal law link point, and applied to areas other than personal law, such as contract, tort, and so on. However, there are no uniform standards in international treaties and different countries have different legislation and practice. Through investigating and combing its developing history and application, the author clarifies the status of the place of regular residence as the connecting point of personal law, and the importance of defining it accurately, and makes reference to the standards of identification determined by the legislation and practice of various countries. Combined with our country's legislation and judicial practice, we find out the existing problems and put forward some suggestions for improvement. This paper mainly uses the methods of historical research, comparative study and case study. By combing the history of personal law, the background and significance of the place of regular residence are clarified. Then, by comparing the conventions formulated by the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the regulations of the European Union on private international law, and comparing the use of regular residence in the domestic legislation of countries in the common law system and the civil law system, A clear understanding of the status and importance of the place of habitual residence as a connecting point of personal law is established. During the implementation of some conventions formulated by the Hague Conference on Private International Law, some member States have accumulated rich judicial practice, especially in the definition of the place of regular residence of children by the States members of the Convention on Child Abduction. Different countries have different standards of definition. EU regulations are similar, and the practice is mainly focused on marriage and family. In addition to the comparative introduction of treaty application practice, the common law countries in the recognition of the place of habitual residence is also reflected in judicial practice, through the analysis of different judicial cases, and then summed up the standards and considerations of countries to determine the place of habitual residence. The first chapter is a review of the history of personal law identification and the application of the permanent residence. Through the historical evolution of the personal law link point and the conventions formulated by the Hague Conference on Private International Law, the European Union's private international law treaties. The article about the place of regular residence as the connecting point in the domestic legislation of various countries introduces the origin and development of the place of habitual residence as the connection point of personal law and its application in international treaties and the domestic laws of various countries. The second chapter analyzes the recognition of the place of habitual residence from the perspective of comparative law. From the implementation of international conventions to the domestic legislation and practice of various countries, it shows the criteria of determining the place of habitual residence, especially considering the definition of the place of habitual residence of children. From the practice of the Hague Convention on Child Abduction, we can see the difference between the definition of the place of habitual residence of adults. In addition, there are some differences in the definition of this concept between the civil law system and the common law system. The third chapter is based on the legislation and judicial practice on the recognition of the place of habitual residence in China. It mainly introduces the historical evolution of the personal law link point in our country and the status of the place of regular residence as the link point in the current legislation. It also discusses the application of the current law and judicial interpretation of the provisions of the place of habitual residence in practice, showing the importance of applying the relevant provisions accurately in two cases. The fourth chapter combined with other countries to define the legislation and practice of the place of habitual residence, in view of the legislation and judicial practice in China to identify the existing problems of the place of habitual residence, put forward the corresponding recommendations. In particular, the importance of establishing separate criteria for the identification of a child's regular place of residence is highlighted.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D997

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 黃進(jìn);;中國(guó)涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法的制定與完善[J];政法論壇;2011年03期

2 杜新麗;;從住所、國(guó)籍到經(jīng)常居所地——我國(guó)屬人法立法變革研究[J];政法論壇;2011年03期

3 董海洲;;從“身份”到“場(chǎng)所”——屬人法連結(jié)點(diǎn)的歷史與發(fā)展[J];法學(xué)家;2010年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 汪茜;論未成年人慣常居所地的確定[D];南京大學(xué);2015年

，

本文編號(hào)：1836869