本文選題：法治 + 實踐��； 參考：《河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2005年,世界銀行在《國別財富報告》中首次正式提出“法治指數(shù)”這一概念。隨后,法治指數(shù)作為一種用于評價一個國家或地區(qū)法治狀態(tài)的重要工具,越來越受到各國政府和學者的青睞。近年來,由于我國的法治建設不斷深化,學術界和實務界就“法治指數(shù)”的相關問題也進行了深入的研究與探討。建立一套評估指標體系,運用具體的數(shù)值來客觀評價當代中國法治化程度,顯然是一種有益的嘗試。而如何認真理性地對待“法治指數(shù)”,如何科學穩(wěn)妥地進行“法治指數(shù)”實踐,使指數(shù)評估成為一種檢視我國法治現(xiàn)狀的創(chuàng)新制度,自然也成為一個非常有價值的研究方向。法治指數(shù)作為一個發(fā)展中的新生事物,出現(xiàn)在人們視野中的時間較短,因而,學術界對法治指數(shù)的概念界定還相對模糊。于是,本文首先對法治指數(shù)的概念進行界定。同時,對其與“法治評估”、“法治指標體系”這兩個概念進行了區(qū)分。筆者認為建立一套完備的法治指標體系是進行法治評估的首要步驟。而法治指數(shù)是法治評估的一種具體實踐形式,它最終以一個數(shù)值的方式來表現(xiàn)評估的結果。其次,在厘清概念的基礎上,本文對法治指數(shù)建構的合理性作了進一步的探討。既然法治指數(shù)實踐活動方興未艾,那么,它必然有著內在深刻的合理性。無論從法治內涵的可分性、價值基礎的統(tǒng)一性還是從實證主義方法的支撐等維度,都可以為法治指數(shù)構建的合理性作出考證。法治內涵的可分性決定了法治要素的可提取性,進而才使得法治評估指標體系的建立具有了可能。實證主義研究的興起,又為法治指數(shù)的數(shù)量計算提供了科學的方法。而從價值哲學的視角也可以論證法治指數(shù)建構的合理性。法治指數(shù)雖然有著自身無法避免的局限性,但在法治價值相對統(tǒng)一的前提下,其作為一種測量工具,也完全可以發(fā)揮它的正面導向作用。國內外法治指數(shù)實踐的熱潮,更是印證了對法治進行指數(shù)化評估是一種行得通的做法。但是,法治指數(shù)畢竟是一個“舶來品”,它在與中國的環(huán)境對接時,依然面臨著諸多的問題,如:法治內容的不確定,導致了評估標準的繁雜;數(shù)據(jù)來源缺乏一定的可靠性、評估主體的非獨立性都讓法治指數(shù)的可信度降低。最后,基于前述問題的分析,本文從“觀念—頂層設計—具體的運行制度”三個層面來對我國法治指數(shù)的完善提出建議。法治指數(shù)代表的并不單單是一個數(shù)值,而是一種認識法治的思維方式,一種在實踐中解讀法治的方式手段。它最終的落腳點在于推動我國法治的健康發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:In 2005, the World Bank put forward the concept of "Rule of Law Index" for the first time in the country Wealth report. Subsequently, as an important tool to evaluate the rule of law in a country or region, the rule of law index is more and more favored by governments and scholars. In recent years, due to the deepening of the construction of the rule of law in our country, the academic and practical circles have also carried on the thorough research and the discussion to the related question of "rule of law index". It is a beneficial attempt to establish a set of evaluation index system and to objectively evaluate the degree of rule of law in contemporary China by using specific numerical values. And how to treat "index of rule of law" seriously and rationally, how to carry out practice of "index of rule of law" scientifically and steadily, so that index evaluation becomes a kind of innovative system to examine the present situation of rule of law in our country, naturally it also becomes a very valuable research direction. As a new thing in development, the index of rule of law appears in people's field of vision for a short time, so the definition of index of rule of law in academic circles is relatively vague. Therefore, this article first carries on the definition to the rule of law index. At the same time, it distinguishes it from the concept of "evaluation of rule of law" and "index system of rule of law". The author thinks that establishing a complete index system of rule of law is the first step to evaluate the rule of law. The index of rule of law is a kind of concrete practice form of rule of law evaluation, and it expresses the result of evaluation in a numerical way. Secondly, on the basis of clarifying the concept, this paper makes a further discussion on the rationality of the construction of the index of rule of law. Since the practice of the index of rule of law is in the ascendant, it must have inherent and profound rationality. Whether from the separability of the connotation of the rule of law, the unity of the value basis or the support of the positivism method, we can make a textual research on the rationality of the construction of the index of the rule of law. The separability of the connotation of the rule of law determines the extractability of the elements of the rule of law, which makes the establishment of the evaluation index system of the rule of law possible. The rise of positivism provides a scientific method for the quantitative calculation of index of rule of law. From the perspective of value philosophy, we can also demonstrate the rationality of the construction of the index of rule of law. Although the index of the rule of law has its own limitations, it can also play a positive guiding role as a measuring tool under the premise of the relative unity of the value of the rule of law. The upsurge of index practice at home and abroad confirms that it is feasible to evaluate the rule of law indexed. However, the rule of law index is after all an "imported product". It still faces many problems when it comes to the environment of China. For example, the uncertainty of the content of the rule of law leads to the complexity of the evaluation criteria, and the lack of reliability of the data sources. The non-independence of the evaluation subject reduces the credibility of the rule of law index. Finally, based on the analysis of the above problems, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the perfection of the index of rule of law in our country from the three aspects of "concept-top level design-concrete operating system". The index of rule of law represents not only a numerical value, but also a way of thinking to understand the rule of law and a way to interpret the rule of law in practice. Its ultimate goal is to promote the healthy development of our country's rule of law.
【學位授予單位】：河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D920.0

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 戴耀廷;;香港的法治指數(shù)[J];環(huán)球法律評論;2007年06期

2 法訊;;中國內地首個“法治指數(shù)”在余杭發(fā)布[J];中國政法大學學報;2008年05期

3 楊濤;;“法治指數(shù)”有助推進文明進步[J];人民公安;2008年09期

4 ;法治指數(shù)[J];農(nóng)村工作通訊;2008年10期

5 舒泰峰;趙春麗;;余杭首嘗“法治指數(shù)”[J];浙江人大;2008年06期

6 ;“法治指數(shù)”身負重望前路漫漫[J];法制資訊;2008年04期

7 陳慶貴;;余杭首創(chuàng)“法治指數(shù)”的可喜看點[J];法制資訊;2008年04期

8 ;我國內地首個城市法治指數(shù)誕生 群眾滿意度評估占35%[J];領導決策信息;2008年24期

9 錢弘道;;余杭法治指數(shù)的實驗[J];中國司法;2008年09期

10 陳波;陳文琴;劉英;;余杭“法治指數(shù)”再聚焦[J];浙江人大;2009年09期

相關重要報紙文章 前10條

1 楊濤;法治指數(shù)：一個良好開端[N];工人日報;2008年

2 江德華;謹防“法治指數(shù)”變?yōu)椤白哉f自話”[N];21世紀經(jīng)濟報道;2008年

3 新京;中國內地首推“法治指數(shù)”無公信力則無生命力[N];江蘇科技報;2008年

4 《中國司法》雜志副總編 劉武俊;“法治指數(shù)”一小步 法治建設一大步[N];中國經(jīng)濟導報;2008年

5 司法部研究室 劉武俊;“法治指數(shù)”彰顯法治建設的科學發(fā)展導向[N];中國審計報;2008年

6 余東明;我國內地首個城市法治指數(shù)誕生[N];法制日報;2008年

7 本報記者 李剛殷;杭州市余杭區(qū)首推“法治指數(shù)”[N];工人日報;2008年

8 楊濤;“法治指數(shù)”有助于推進文明進步[N];河北日報;2008年

9 本版編輯邋旌景 楊秀峰 王木易;浙江余杭推出“法治指數(shù)”[N];中國縣域經(jīng)濟報;2008年

10 劉武俊;將科學發(fā)展理念引入法治建設[N];學習時報;2008年

相關碩士學位論文 前9條

1 王巍;法治指數(shù)本土化構建[D];武漢科技大學;2010年

2 楊東鶴;地方法治指數(shù)及其實現(xiàn)[D];山東大學;2013年

3 余忠全;論中國法治評估體系的完善[D];山東大學;2015年

4 孫夢嬌;"法治指數(shù)"的法理分析[D];河南大學;2015年

5 付夢祥;中外法治評估指標比較研究[D];浙江大學;2017年

6 王裕根;量化“法治”：WGI法治指數(shù)研究[D];西南政法大學;2016年

7 劉金諾;“法治指數(shù)”中國化研究[D];遼寧大學;2012年

8 張晨;論中國內地法治量化指標體系的構建[D];上海師范大學;2015年

9 王璐;論法治評估及其中國實踐[D];遼寧大學;2014年

，

本文編號：1791577