宅基地使用權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓立法研究
本文選題:宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓 切入點(diǎn):有償有期限使用 出處:《浙江大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:本文的研究以十八屆三中全會(huì)全面深化改革以來(lái)關(guān)于宅基地使用權(quán)改革的精神為出發(fā)點(diǎn),對(duì)宅基地現(xiàn)行相關(guān)制度、存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)整理分析,并闡述了宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓的必要性和可行性,歸納各地的宅基地試點(diǎn)改革的成果,提出宅基地使用權(quán)立法的基本思路。按照基本思路提出宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓立法的具體建議、宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓現(xiàn)行法律制度修改建議、宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓立法建議條文。本文第一部分介紹了宅基地現(xiàn)狀問(wèn)題。認(rèn)為宅基地使用權(quán)存在:大量長(zhǎng)期閑置且隱形交易;宅基地房屋買賣沖突糾紛;宅基地財(cái)產(chǎn)性權(quán)能不足;宅基地人在買賣、出租、抵押、繼承和贈(zèng)與等方面是受到諸多限制;宅基地及房屋所有權(quán)不動(dòng)產(chǎn)登記;宅基地取得制度不健全;宅基地立法不完善等。第二部分的前半部分分析了宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓改革的必要性。宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓有利于"農(nóng)民",有利于政府,有利于城鄉(xiāng)一體化發(fā)展和有利于提升宅基地資源市場(chǎng)配置效率。第二部分的后半部分則從保障農(nóng)民住房財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán),集體經(jīng)營(yíng)性建設(shè)用地與國(guó)有土地同權(quán)同價(jià),宅基地抵押,戶籍城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)一等方面分析了國(guó)家深化農(nóng)村土地制度改革思路。并系統(tǒng)梳理總結(jié)國(guó)內(nèi)各地宅基地試點(diǎn)成果,提出宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓改革具有可行性。本文第三部分,提出宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓基本思路,并從宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓主體等6個(gè)方面提出宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓立法的具體建議。最終提出宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓現(xiàn)行法律制度修改完善建議和宅基地轉(zhuǎn)讓立法建議條文。本文第四部分為結(jié)語(yǔ),概要?dú)w納本篇文章的論點(diǎn),并提出展望。
[Abstract]:Based on the spirit of the reform of homestead use right since the third Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the existing system and existing problems of the homestead system.It also expounds the necessity and feasibility of the homestead transfer, sums up the results of the pilot reform of the homestead in various places, and puts forward the basic ideas of the legislation of the right to use the homestead.According to the basic ideas, this paper puts forward the specific suggestions on the legislation of homestead transfer, the amendment of the current legal system of homestead transfer, and the provisions of the legislative proposal on homestead transfer.The first part of this paper introduces the current situation of homestead.The author thinks that the right to use the homestead exists: a large number of long-term idle and invisible transactions; the disputes over the purchase and sale of homestead houses; the insufficient power of the property of the homestead; the limitation of the homestead people in buying and selling, renting, mortgaging, inheriting and donating;Real estate registration of homestead and house ownership; imperfection of Homestead acquisition system; imperfect legislation of Homestead.The first half of the second part analyzes the necessity of the reform of homestead transfer.The transfer of homestead is beneficial to the farmers, the government, the development of urban and rural integration and the efficiency of the allocation of homestead resources in the market.The second part of the second part of the second part from the protection of farmers' housing property rights, collective construction land and state-owned land with the same price, homestead mortgage, the unity of urban and rural household registration and other aspects of the country to deepen the reform of rural land system ideas.And systematic summary of domestic homestead pilot results, homestead transfer reform is feasible.In the third part, the author puts forward the basic idea of homestead transfer, and puts forward some concrete suggestions on the legislation of homestead transfer from six aspects, such as the subject of homestead transfer.Finally put forward the current legal system of homestead transfer to amend and improve the legislative provisions of homestead transfer.The fourth part of this paper is the conclusion, summarizes the argument of this article, and puts forward the prospect.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:浙江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號(hào)】:D923.2;D922.32
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 楊雅婷;;我國(guó)宅基地有償使用制度探索與構(gòu)建[J];南開(kāi)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年04期
2 陳華明;;我國(guó)農(nóng)戶宅基地用益物權(quán)之完善[J];法制博覽;2016年11期
3 龍開(kāi)勝;;宅基地使用權(quán)制度改革的現(xiàn)實(shí)邏輯與路徑選擇[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)家;2016年02期
4 王平;;農(nóng)村宅基地使用權(quán)確權(quán)登記發(fā)證存在的問(wèn)題研究與對(duì)策[J];農(nóng)業(yè)與技術(shù);2015年20期
5 彭煥才;;新型城鎮(zhèn)化“以人為核心”的內(nèi)涵與路徑[J];中央社會(huì)主義學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期
6 朱新華;;戶籍制度改革視角下農(nóng)村宅基地資本化研究[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年09期
7 祁全明;;我國(guó)農(nóng)村閑置宅基地的現(xiàn)狀、原因及其治理措施[J];農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年08期
8 李輝;王良健;;土地資源配置的效率損失與優(yōu)化途徑[J];中國(guó)土地科學(xué);2015年07期
9 楊俊;張曉云;湯斌;;深化改革背景下農(nóng)村房屋買賣路徑探析[J];中國(guó)土地科學(xué);2015年06期
10 石亞軍;;排除市場(chǎng)壁壘須推倒“五門” 建構(gòu)五位一體制度體系[J];中國(guó)行政管理;2014年10期
,本文編號(hào):1705816
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1705816.html