本文選題：封閉型　切入點(diǎn)：開放型　出處：《蘭州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：村民自治制度是中國(guó)政治在鄉(xiāng)村層面的民主實(shí)踐,開啟了村民個(gè)體以民主選舉形式自主管理村莊事務(wù)的新時(shí)代,改變了鄉(xiāng)村傳統(tǒng)治理方式,村委會(huì)選舉成為公共權(quán)力民主性的體現(xiàn)和個(gè)體表達(dá)利益訴求的制度化渠道,被視為評(píng)判村莊自治成果的衡量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。在國(guó)家現(xiàn)代化發(fā)展的社會(huì)背景下,轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的中國(guó)農(nóng)村選舉制度正面臨著復(fù)雜變化。文章主要從三部分研究村域內(nèi)傳統(tǒng)宗族與新型農(nóng)民合作社的組織力量博弈,對(duì)村委會(huì)選舉的競(jìng)選格局及村莊治理結(jié)構(gòu)產(chǎn)生的影響。第一部分:第一章通過對(duì)農(nóng)民合作社和宗族的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)梳理,厘清當(dāng)前農(nóng)民合作社和宗族政治參與的研究現(xiàn)狀,揭示中國(guó)鄉(xiāng)土社會(huì)正在經(jīng)歷著“半熟人社會(huì)”的深刻巨變,差序格局的舊倫理逐漸消亡,民主制度成為重建農(nóng)村秩序的主要制度選擇。鑒于中國(guó)村莊的復(fù)雜性,文章在第二章通過對(duì)西北邊疆地區(qū)土地開發(fā)不充分,移民人口眾多的特點(diǎn)分析,依據(jù)村莊邊界和封閉與開放社會(huì)的理論基礎(chǔ),將村莊劃分為開放型村莊和封閉型村莊。第二部分:第三章和第四章分別從定性和定量?jī)蓚�(gè)角度研究不同村莊類型內(nèi)宗族和農(nóng)民合作社對(duì)村委會(huì)選舉的影響。在定性分析中,文章從社會(huì)特征差異性入手,構(gòu)建了一個(gè)由社區(qū)記憶和農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)化兩個(gè)維度組成的社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)與村委會(huì)選舉分析模型,通過案例研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在封閉型村莊,宗族強(qiáng),合作社弱,宗族勢(shì)力在村委會(huì)選舉中具有優(yōu)勢(shì);而在開放型村莊,合作社強(qiáng),宗族弱,農(nóng)民合作社在選舉中占據(jù)優(yōu)勢(shì)。定量分析中,文章依據(jù)10個(gè)縣20個(gè)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)的調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù),通過對(duì)村委會(huì)選舉的過程性研究,運(yùn)用層次分析法構(gòu)建了測(cè)量村委會(huì)選舉行動(dòng)力的指標(biāo)體系,比較了在不同類型村莊農(nóng)民合作社與宗族參與村委會(huì)選舉的行動(dòng)力差異,進(jìn)一步深化了開放型村莊農(nóng)民合作社參與村委會(huì)選舉行動(dòng)力高于宗族,封閉型村莊宗族參與村委會(huì)選舉行動(dòng)力高于農(nóng)民合作社的研究結(jié)論。第三部分:文章在第五章運(yùn)用多元層次回歸模型從個(gè)人組織特征、民主構(gòu)建、利益相關(guān)性認(rèn)知三個(gè)方面探討了在開放型村莊影響合作社成員村委會(huì)選舉行動(dòng)力的內(nèi)部因素。計(jì)量結(jié)果顯示,合作社成員的入社年數(shù)、接受合作社服務(wù)、參與合作社民主選舉、民主管理、民主監(jiān)督活動(dòng)以及利益相關(guān)性認(rèn)知均對(duì)社員的選舉行動(dòng)力產(chǎn)生正向影響作用,并利用社員組織身份的分組樣本證實(shí)了結(jié)論的穩(wěn)健性。因此可以說,推動(dòng)農(nóng)民合作社發(fā)展有利于重構(gòu)村莊民主新秩序,從深層挖掘推動(dòng)基層民主發(fā)展進(jìn)程的主干力量,改善村莊治理格局。
[Abstract]:The system of villager autonomy is a democratic practice of Chinese politics at the rural level, which opens a new era of independent management of village affairs by villagers in the form of democratic election, and changes the traditional way of rural governance. The election of village committee becomes the embodiment of democracy of public power and the institutionalized channel of individual expression of interests and demands, and it is regarded as the standard to judge the achievement of village autonomy. In the period of transition, China's rural election system is facing complex changes. The influence on the election pattern of village committee election and the structure of village governance. The first part: the first chapter, through combing the relevant documents of peasant cooperative and clan, clarifies the current research status of peasant cooperative and clan political participation. It is revealed that China's local society is undergoing a profound change of "semi-acquaintance society", the old ethics of the pattern of differential order is gradually dying out, and the democratic system has become the main institutional choice for re-establishing rural order. In view of the complexity of Chinese villages, In the second chapter, based on the analysis of the characteristics of inadequate land development and large immigrant population in the Northwest Frontier region, based on the theoretical basis of the village boundary and the closed and open society, The second part: chapter three and chapter 4th, respectively, from qualitative and quantitative perspectives, to study the influence of clan and farmer cooperative in different village types on village committee election. Starting with the difference of social characteristics, this paper constructs a social relationship network and village committee election analysis model, which consists of two dimensions of community memory and agricultural industrialization. Through case studies, it is found that in closed villages, clans are strong. Cooperatives are weak and clan forces have advantages in village committee elections, while in open villages, cooperatives are strong, clan is weak, and peasant cooperatives occupy an advantage in elections. In quantitative analysis, the article bases on the survey data of 20 villages and towns in 10 counties. Through the study of the process of village committee election, this paper constructs an index system to measure the village committee election action ability by using the analytic hierarchy process, and compares the difference of the village farmers' cooperative and clan participating in the village committee election in different types of villages. It has further deepened the participation of open village farmers' cooperatives in the election of village committees, which is more active than the clans. The conclusion of closed village clan participating in village committee election is higher than that of farmer cooperative. The third part: in chapter 5th, the author uses the multilevel regression model to construct democracy from the characteristics of individual organization. This paper discusses the internal factors that influence the ability of election of the village committee of cooperative members in open villages from three aspects of cognition of interest relevance. The results show that the number of years of membership of cooperative members, the number of years of membership of cooperative members, and the participation of cooperative members in democratic election of cooperatives, Democratic management, democratic supervision activities and cognition of interest relevance all have a positive effect on the election action of members, and confirm the robustness of the conclusion by using the grouping sample of membership identity. Promoting the development of peasant cooperatives is conducive to reconstructing the new order of democracy in villages, digging up the main forces that promote the process of democratic development at the grass-roots level, and improving the pattern of village governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D422.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張益豐;陳瑩鈺;潘曉飛;;農(nóng)民合作社功能“嵌入”與村治模式改良[J];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年06期

2 趙泉民;井世潔;;合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織嵌入與村莊治理結(jié)構(gòu)重構(gòu)——村社共治中合作社“有限主導(dǎo)型”治理模式剖析[J];貴州社會(huì)科學(xué);2016年07期

3 王圖展;;農(nóng)民合作社議價(jià)權(quán)、自生能力與成員經(jīng)濟(jì)績(jī)效——基于381份農(nóng)民專業(yè)合作社調(diào)查問卷的實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村經(jīng)濟(jì);2016年01期

4 陳前恒;魏文慧;;草根組織經(jīng)歷與政治參與:來自中國(guó)村莊選舉的證據(jù)[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村觀察;2016年01期

5 張連剛;柳娥;;組織認(rèn)同、內(nèi)部社會(huì)資本與合作社成員滿意度——基于云南省263個(gè)合作社成員的實(shí)證分析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村觀察;2015年05期

6 韓國(guó)明;王凱曦;;從權(quán)威政治到農(nóng)民合作社參與的民主政治[J];華南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2015年03期

7 劉行玉;;宗族觀念、選舉程序與均勢(shì)競(jìng)爭(zhēng):夏村村民選舉觀察與反思[J];中共福建省委黨校學(xué)報(bào);2015年04期

8 熊秉元;;五倫之外[J];讀書;2014年12期

9 盛洪;;中國(guó)與西方是如何分道揚(yáng)鑣的?[J];讀書;2014年05期

10 黃勝忠;;利益相關(guān)者集體選擇視角的農(nóng)民合作社形成邏輯、邊界與本質(zhì)分析[J];中國(guó)農(nóng)村觀察;2014年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 韓俊;秦中春;張?jiān)迫A;羅丹;;我國(guó)農(nóng)民合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀與面臨的問題[N];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)時(shí)報(bào);2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 郭彩云;農(nóng)村民間組織與鄉(xiāng)村治理研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

2 陸保良;村落共同體的邊界變遷與村落轉(zhuǎn)型[D];浙江大學(xué);2012年

3 閻占定;新型農(nóng)民合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織參與鄉(xiāng)村治理研究[D];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 張恒銘;農(nóng)民合作社參與村委會(huì)選舉的行動(dòng)機(jī)制和影響效力研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2016年

2 原賀賀;農(nóng)民合作社參與鄉(xiāng)村治理模式構(gòu)建[D];西華師范大學(xué);2015年

3 馮秀敏;論農(nóng)村合作經(jīng)濟(jì)組織與村民自治的發(fā)展[D];中國(guó)海洋大學(xué);2014年

4 王靜;新時(shí)期中國(guó)農(nóng)村民間組織的制度環(huán)境研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

5 王婧婧;宗族現(xiàn)象對(duì)村治的影響研究[D];山東大學(xué);2012年

6 陳素娥;中麻地村社會(huì)關(guān)系網(wǎng)絡(luò)研究[D];中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1644465