發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-01-26 09:14

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 快遞服務(wù)合同 保價(jià)條款 損害賠償 法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)及電商的發(fā)展,快遞行業(yè)在市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)中扮演著舉足輕重的角色,快遞公司的數(shù)量不斷增加,規(guī)模不斷的擴(kuò)大。2016年,隨著"四通一達(dá)"和順豐相繼進(jìn)入資本市場(chǎng),快遞行業(yè)迎來發(fā)展的新局面,但同時(shí),快遞損害賠償糾紛從未間斷。追根溯源,快遞服務(wù)合同保價(jià)條款存在較大爭(zhēng)議,尤其是保價(jià)條款的效力認(rèn)定問題,各界對(duì)此持有不同的看法,即便是在法院內(nèi)部也得不到統(tǒng)一,出現(xiàn)同案不同判的現(xiàn)象。本文不僅僅從消費(fèi)者的角度出發(fā),更在維護(hù)公平的角度上探討保價(jià)條款的相關(guān)法律問題,以期提出一些具有可行性的建議,防范保價(jià)條款的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。本文共有3個(gè)章節(jié)。第一章介紹了快遞服務(wù)合同保價(jià)條款的相關(guān)理論。第一節(jié)介紹了快遞合同的性質(zhì),將其與郵政服務(wù)區(qū)別開來。第二節(jié)提出了保價(jià)條款的基礎(chǔ)理論。第一部分是格式合同的基本理論包括格式合同最核心的問題即格式條款的效力認(rèn)定的相關(guān)理論,為保價(jià)條款的效力認(rèn)定做鋪墊;第二部分是保價(jià)條款的特征及作用,介紹了保價(jià)條款的概念、發(fā)展歷程及其存在的合理性和必要性。開篇交代了保價(jià)條款的基礎(chǔ)理論,為保價(jià)條款的法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn)做鋪墊。第二章是對(duì)保價(jià)條款引發(fā)的法律問題的評(píng)析,本章通過幾個(gè)判決結(jié)果各不相同的典型案例,交代快遞服務(wù)糾紛法院間裁判不統(tǒng)一的法律背景,引出保價(jià)條款的主要爭(zhēng)議以及筆者的主要觀點(diǎn),并一一進(jìn)行闡述和說明。本章分為四節(jié),包括快遞糾紛法律適用標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一、保價(jià)條款的效力難以認(rèn)定、損害賠償額難以確定和實(shí)際損失的證明難度較大。第三章是保價(jià)條款的完善。本章分為兩節(jié),第一節(jié)是介紹保價(jià)條款的域外相關(guān)制度與對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示,通過與發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的相對(duì)完善的快遞制度的對(duì)比,尋找我國(guó)存在的不足,學(xué)習(xí)國(guó)外先進(jìn)的制度,促進(jìn)快遞行業(yè)的發(fā)展,同時(shí)為下文的防范措施做鋪墊。第二節(jié)是保價(jià)條款法律問題的應(yīng)對(duì)措施,通過上文的分析,我們可以看到我國(guó)快遞制度存在的缺陷,為了解決保價(jià)條款的存在的法律問題、進(jìn)一步完善保價(jià)條款,我們需要在多個(gè)方面作出努力,筆者提出了六個(gè)完善建議,以期能夠有所價(jià)值,促進(jìn)快遞行業(yè)又好又健康的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the development of network and e-commerce, express delivery industry plays an important role in the market economy, the number of express delivery companies is increasing, the scale of expansion. 2016. With the "four links" and Shunfeng have entered the capital market, the express delivery industry ushered in a new situation, but at the same time, express damage compensation disputes never stopped. There is a great dispute about the price guarantee clause of express delivery service contract, especially the validity of the price guarantee clause, which has different views from all walks of life, even if it is not unified within the court. This article not only from the point of view of consumers, but also in the perspective of fairness in the protection of the price clause related to legal issues, with a view to putting forward some feasible suggestions. This article has three chapters. The first chapter introduces the related theory of the courier service contract price insurance clause. The first section introduces the nature of express delivery contract. The second section puts forward the basic theory of the insurance clause. The first part is the basic theory of the format contract including the most core issue of the format contract namely the relevant theory of the validity of the format clause. Laying the groundwork for the confirmation of the validity of the insurance clause; The second part is the characteristics and functions of the price clause, introduces the concept, development process and the rationality and necessity of its existence, and explains the basic theory of the price insurance clause at the beginning of the article. The second chapter is the analysis of the legal problems caused by the insurance clause. This chapter adopts several typical cases with different judgment results. Explain the legal background of the disunity of the court adjudication between the courier service disputes, draw out the main dispute of the insurance clause and the author's main point of view, and explain and explain one by one. This chapter is divided into four sections. Including express delivery disputes applicable to the law standards are not uniform, the effectiveness of the price clause is difficult to determine, damage compensation difficult to determine and the actual loss of proof is difficult. Chapter III is the perfection of the price clause. This chapter is divided into two sections. The first section is to introduce the foreign provisions of the relevant system and the inspiration to our country, through the comparison with the relatively perfect express delivery system in developed countries, to find the shortcomings of our country, learn from the advanced foreign system. Promote the development of express delivery industry, at the same time for the following preventive measures to do. The second section is the legal issues of price protection measures, through the above analysis, we can see the shortcomings of the express delivery system in our country. In order to solve the legal problems and further improve the price clause, we need to make efforts in a number of aspects, the author put forward six perfect suggestions, in order to be of value. To promote the development of express delivery industry is good and healthy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D923.6

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范雪飛;;論不公平條款制度——兼論我國(guó)顯失公平制度之于格式條款[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2014年06期

2 郭英華;周楷敏;;快遞服務(wù)合同保價(jià)條款效力認(rèn)定及損失計(jì)算[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年04期

3 沈明磊;董蕾蕾;;快遞丟失損毀賠償糾紛若干法律問題研究[J];法律適用;2014年06期

4 翁強(qiáng);郝俊瀟;章程;;論快遞服務(wù)損害賠償中違約責(zé)任與侵權(quán)責(zé)任的競(jìng)合[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2014年02期

5 陳海燕;常連玉;;國(guó)外快遞業(yè)發(fā)展對(duì)我國(guó)民營(yíng)快遞業(yè)的啟示[J];交通企業(yè)管理;2013年07期

6 范云兵;;詳解《快遞市場(chǎng)管理辦法》[J];中國(guó)物流與采購(gòu);2013年05期

7 高翼飛;;快遞公司對(duì)丟失的未保價(jià)貴重貨物的賠償責(zé)任[J];人民司法;2013年04期

8 蘇號(hào)朋;唐慧俊;;快遞服務(wù)合同中的消費(fèi)者權(quán)益保護(hù)[J];東方法學(xué);2012年06期

9 高翼飛;;快遞保價(jià)條款在為誰“保駕”[J];法庭內(nèi)外;2012年08期

10 陳蕓;;快遞行業(yè)限額賠償格式條款的效力及損失賠償[J];人民司法;2011年24期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 賈玉平;張毅;;快遞服務(wù)運(yùn)單格式條款研究[A];2011’中國(guó)快遞論壇論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 趙青;劉靜;;快遞貨物遺失時(shí)保價(jià)條款的法律適用及效力[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

2 鄭夢(mèng)超;;北京法官炮轟快遞保價(jià)條款[N];中國(guó)消費(fèi)者報(bào);2012年

3 羅懿;徐飛;;未保價(jià)快遞發(fā)生貨損承運(yùn)人賠償責(zé)任探析[N];人民法院報(bào);2009年

4 陳u&;;郵遞物品遺失的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)選擇與責(zé)任承擔(dān)[N];人民法院報(bào);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 欒靜;快遞服務(wù)合同的法律關(guān)系研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

2 徐惠妍;我國(guó)快遞合同格式條款法律問題研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2013年

3 張岱維;郵件法定限額賠償?shù)姆蓡栴}探討[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

4 胡立超;運(yùn)輸合同中保價(jià)條款適用問題的案例分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1465239