本文關(guān)鍵詞：公民提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟問題研究　出處：《渤海大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 環(huán)境行政公益訴訟 原告資格 問題研究

【摘要】：環(huán)境問題的成因多種多樣,非常復(fù)雜,且治理難度也大,單純依靠政府環(huán)境行政管理機(jī)關(guān)運(yùn)用行政手段并不能完全達(dá)到保護(hù)環(huán)境公共利益的目的,而現(xiàn)階段隨著人民物質(zhì)文化生活的日益豐富,公民的生活質(zhì)量越來越高,環(huán)境問題也日益受到關(guān)注,在環(huán)境問題參與方面,公民不再滿足于傳統(tǒng)的行政復(fù)議、相對人行政訴訟等模式,對監(jiān)督政府的形式要求也越來越全面,環(huán)境公益訴訟已成為法治國家不可阻擋的立法潮流。目前,在我國現(xiàn)階段對環(huán)境行政管理機(jī)關(guān)的監(jiān)督體系不夠完善,例如我國并未確立公民提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度,而在現(xiàn)實(shí)生活中,公民進(jìn)行該訴訟的案例并不少見但多數(shù)因為公民不具有該類案件的原告資格而被法院依法駁回,可以看出,公民踴躍嘗試多種參與政府環(huán)境管理與監(jiān)督政府環(huán)境管理的途徑,司法實(shí)踐已經(jīng)走在了立法的前面,法律的滯后性特征使得該類案件得不到訴訟的解決。然而公民提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟制度的設(shè)立不僅能夠有效督促政府依法行政,有效保護(hù)環(huán)境公共利益,還能夠提升公民的環(huán)境權(quán)意識,積極參與環(huán)境治理。本文主要通過引用公民王理清對青島市嶗山市環(huán)保局提起的訴訟的具體案例,從個案剖析當(dāng)前社會中存在的公民提起環(huán)境行政公益訴訟的現(xiàn)象,指出該制度在我國立法中存在空白,并對此從法理角度結(jié)合國內(nèi)外司法實(shí)踐提出了一系列制度設(shè)計。
[Abstract]:The causes of environmental problems are various, very complex, and difficult to manage. Relying solely on the administrative means of government environmental administration agencies can not completely achieve the purpose of protecting environmental public interests. At this stage, with the increasing enrichment of people's material and cultural life, the quality of life of citizens is becoming higher and higher, and environmental issues are increasingly concerned. In terms of participation in environmental issues, citizens are no longer satisfied with the traditional administrative reconsideration. The relative party administrative litigation mode, to supervise the government the form request also more and more comprehensive, the environmental public interest lawsuit has become the rule of law country irresistible legislative trend. At the present stage of our country, the supervision system of environmental administrative organs is not perfect enough. For example, our country has not established the system of environmental administrative public interest litigation brought by citizens, but in real life. It is not uncommon for citizens to carry out this lawsuit, but most of them are rejected by the court according to law because they do not have the plaintiff qualification of this kind of case, as can be seen. Citizens actively try a variety of ways to participate in government environmental management and supervision of government environmental management, judicial practice has been ahead of the legislation. The lagging characteristics of the law make this kind of cases can not be resolved by litigation. However, the establishment of the public interest litigation system of environmental administration can not only effectively urge the government to administer according to law, but also effectively protect the public interests of the environment. Also can enhance the awareness of environmental rights of citizens, actively participate in environmental governance. This article mainly through citing citizen Wang Liqing to Qingdao City Laoshan City Environmental Protection Bureau of the specific case. This paper analyzes the phenomenon of environmental administrative public interest litigation brought by citizens in the current society, and points out that there is a gap in the legislation of our country. And put forward a series of system design from the angle of legal theory and judicial practice at home and abroad.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：渤海大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D925.3;D922.68

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 裘t，

本文編號：1390001