【摘要】：《洪范》篇因系統(tǒng)闡述了古代帝王治理國(guó)家的原則和方法而受到世人的推崇，歷朝歷代研習(xí)者甚繁，是《尚書(shū)》中被研究得最早、研究得最多的篇章，但其相關(guān)研究至今并非了無(wú)疑竇。隨著出土文獻(xiàn)的發(fā)掘、多學(xué)科交叉研究方法等新資料、新方法的運(yùn)用，《洪范》學(xué)研究日趨呈現(xiàn)多角度、多層次的發(fā)展方向，1949年之后兩岸關(guān)系從最開(kāi)始的冰凍走向逐漸融合，兩岸各種交流合作有序開(kāi)展，國(guó)家“十二五”規(guī)劃中又明確提出要弘揚(yáng)優(yōu)秀傳統(tǒng)文化，現(xiàn)對(duì)建國(guó)之后兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究成果作一比較研究，必將利于兩岸學(xué)術(shù)文化交流，利于傳統(tǒng)文化的傳承，更利于今后的《洪范》學(xué)取得更新的研究成果。 1949—2011年間兩岸出版的《洪范》學(xué)研究成果非常雜亂，急需系統(tǒng)整理，按照年代的跨度來(lái)看，主要分為三個(gè)歷史時(shí)期，即八十年代之前的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究成果、八十年代至新世紀(jì)之前的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究成果與新世紀(jì)以來(lái)的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究成果。 通過(guò)全面系統(tǒng)地梳理分析1949-2011年間兩岸出版的《洪范》學(xué)研究成果，兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究在三個(gè)歷史時(shí)期的差異性顯而易見(jiàn)，六十余年來(lái)兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究的整體異同亦得到了概括總結(jié)。八十年代之前的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究以臺(tái)灣研究為主，無(wú)論是《洪范》研究成果、研究學(xué)者還是研究?jī)?nèi)容，臺(tái)灣都明顯優(yōu)于大陸。八十年代至新世紀(jì)之前的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究開(kāi)始以大陸研究為主，大陸的《洪范》研究成果與研究學(xué)者的數(shù)量明顯增多，研究?jī)?nèi)容更是實(shí)現(xiàn)了歷史上的突破，新增了《洪范》學(xué)史研究領(lǐng)域，開(kāi)辟了《洪范》學(xué)研究的新天地，，此時(shí)臺(tái)灣《洪范》學(xué)研究仍沿襲傳統(tǒng)研究領(lǐng)域，未有實(shí)質(zhì)性的突破。新世紀(jì)以來(lái)的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究，大陸更是占據(jù)了主導(dǎo)地位，《洪范》研究成果與研究學(xué)者數(shù)量穩(wěn)步上升，研究?jī)?nèi)容較之以前又有了新的發(fā)展，學(xué)者們開(kāi)始將《洪范》與其他學(xué)科聯(lián)系起來(lái)進(jìn)行研究，用聯(lián)系的眼光去探究《洪范》學(xué)，此時(shí)臺(tái)灣《洪范》學(xué)研究嚴(yán)重萎縮，僅3項(xiàng)《洪范》學(xué)研究成果，僅涉及《洪范》文本研究，研究范圍明顯縮小。 建國(guó)至今六十余年來(lái)，兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究以八十年代為重要拐點(diǎn)，兩岸《洪范》研究成果、研究學(xué)者以及研究?jī)?nèi)容在八十年代前后呈現(xiàn)明顯不同的發(fā)展態(tài)勢(shì)，大陸研究在八十年代之后快速發(fā)展，臺(tái)灣研究在八十年代之后逐漸消沉，透過(guò)這一時(shí)期的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究比較可知，《洪范》學(xué)研究要想有序地發(fā)展下去，必須要建立一支薪火相傳的《洪范》學(xué)研究學(xué)術(shù)梯隊(duì)，構(gòu)建一個(gè)開(kāi)放自由的《洪范》學(xué)溝通平臺(tái)，創(chuàng)建一套科學(xué)合理的《洪范》學(xué)研究體系。 綜上所述，《洪范》學(xué)涉及政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、哲學(xué)、科學(xué)、天文、歷法等我國(guó)古代社會(huì)生活領(lǐng)域的方方面面，繼續(xù)深入挖掘其現(xiàn)世的學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值具有非常重大的意義。比較研究1949年之后的兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究成果，不僅可以系統(tǒng)梳理六十余年來(lái)兩岸《洪范》學(xué)研究的嬗變軌跡，更能明確現(xiàn)今《洪范》學(xué)研究的不足與優(yōu)劣，為《洪范》學(xué)研究體系的建設(shè)與完善貢獻(xiàn)一份綿薄之力。
[Abstract]:It is the first and most important chapter in the study to study the principles and methods of the ancient emperor's governing state by the system, which is the first to be studied in the Book of History, but the relevant research is not in doubt. With the excavation of the unearthed literature, the application of new methods, such as the method of multi-disciplinary cross-study and the application of the new method, the study of "Hongfan> study is more and more multi-angle and multi-level development direction. After 1949, the cross-Straits relations are gradually integrated from the beginning of the freezing trend, and the exchanges and cooperation between the two sides will be carried out in an orderly way." In that national "12th Five-Year" plan, it is clear that it is necessary to carry forward the excellent traditional culture, and to make a comparative study on the research results of the two sides of the two sides of the country after the founding of the country, which will be conducive to the cultural exchange between the two sides and to the inheritance of the traditional culture. It is more beneficial to the future research results of the study. During the period of 1949 to 2011, the research results of the two sides of the two sides of the two sides were very messy and urgent, and the system was urgently needed. According to the span of the time, it was divided into three historical periods, that is, the two sides of the two sides before the 1980 's. The results of the study on the cross-strait relations between the 1980 's and the new century and the cross-strait relations since the new century Based on the comprehensive and systematic analysis of the research results of the two cross-strait publications, the difference between the two sides on the two sides of the study of the "Hongfan> study" in the three historical periods is obvious, and the overall similarities and differences between the two sides of the two sides on both sides of the two sides of the two sides have been made. The study of the two cross-strait relations before the 1980 's is based on the study of the Taiwan, whether it is the study of Hong Fan> the research results, the research scholars and the research contents, and the Taiwan is obviously excellent. On the mainland, the study on the cross-strait relations between the 1980 's and the new century began to study mainly on the mainland, and the research results of the "Hong Fan" and the research scholars in the mainland increased significantly, and the research content was a breakthrough in history. In the field of research, the new world of the study of "Hongfan> study has been opened. At this time, the study of" Hongfan> study in Taiwan still follows the traditional research field, and has not been substantial. " In the new century, the study on the cross-strait relations between the two sides has dominated the study, and the number of research and research scholars has steadily increased, and the content of the research has a new development compared with that of the former, and the scholars began to associate with other subjects. The study of the line of the study, with the view of the contact, the study of the study, at this time, Taiwan study serious atrophy, only 3 of the study research results, only to the text research, the study scope is clear Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, since the founding of the People's Republic of China for more than 60 years, the study of the two sides of the two sides has become an important turning point in the 1980 's. The research results of the two sides of the two sides of the People's Republic of China, the research scholars and the contents of the study show a distinct development trend in the 1980s and after the 1980s. After the rapid development of the post-1980s, the Taiwan study was gradually depressed after the 1980 's. Through the comparison between the two sides of the two sides of the period, the study of the two sides on both sides of the two sides of the study shows that the study of the "Hong Fan> study should be developed in an orderly way, and it is necessary to establish a one-year-old one." To study the academic ladder, to build an open and free learning communication platform, and to create a scientific and reasonable set of To sum up, to sum up, study all aspects of the ancient social life of China, such as politics, economy, philosophy, science, astronomy, and calendar, and continue to tap into the academic value of its present world. It is of great significance to compare the research results of the two cross-strait relations after 1949, not only can the system be combed for more than 60 years, the development of the cross-strait relations between the two sides of the two sides is more clear than that of the study. The shortcomings and disadvantages of the study are the construction and improvement of the study system of the study system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：K221.04

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 柯昊;;簡(jiǎn)論西周時(shí)期“陰陽(yáng)”、“五行”在國(guó)家政治領(lǐng)域的運(yùn)用[J];寶雞文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年01期

2 張紫葛 ,高紹先;論《洪范》的法學(xué)意義[J];成都大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1986年02期

3 童明倫;論《洪范》篇是我國(guó)古代政治文化綱領(lǐng)[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1987年04期

4 張懷通;;由“以數(shù)為紀(jì)”看《洪范》的性質(zhì)與年代[J];東南文化;2006年03期

5 錢(qián)宗武;《尚書(shū)》成語(yǔ)簡(jiǎn)析[J];川東學(xué)刊;1995年04期

6 梁韋弦;;《尚書(shū)·洪范》與漢易卦氣學(xué)[J];福建師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

7 沈利華;;從《尚書(shū)·洪范》談起——中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)幸福觀分析[J];古典文學(xué)知識(shí);2007年06期

8 錢(qián)宗武;《洪范》“者”字辨——兼談文言“者”的詞性[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;1991年04期

9 錢(qián)宗武;今文《尚書(shū)》語(yǔ)氣詞的語(yǔ)用范圍和語(yǔ)用特征[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2001年04期

10 周正穎,邱月;今文《尚書(shū)》兼語(yǔ)句研究[J];古漢語(yǔ)研究;2005年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張華;《洪范》與先秦思想[D];吉林大學(xué);2011年

2 張兵;《洪范》詮釋研究[D];山東大學(xué);2005年

3 李軍靖;《洪范》與古代政治文明[D];鄭州大學(xué);2005年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 高雅潔;今文《尚書(shū)》的特殊句式和關(guān)聯(lián)詞語(yǔ)研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2002年

2 唐智燕;今文《尚書(shū)》動(dòng)詞語(yǔ)法研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2003年

3 吳建偉;宋代《洪范》研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2004年

4 邱月;今文《尚書(shū)》名詞研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2005年

5 朱淑華;今文《尚書(shū)》詞義引申研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2006年

6 湯莉莉;今文《尚書(shū)》同族詞研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2006年

7 楊飛;今文《尚書(shū)》形容詞研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2007年

8 呂勝男;今文《尚書(shū)》用韻研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2007年

9 孫麗娟;今文《尚書(shū)》動(dòng)詞研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2007年

10 李霞;今文《尚書(shū)》修辭格研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2009年

本文編號(hào)：2471318

suoshi