【摘要】：本文旨在探討北周皇權(quán)、相權(quán)此消彼長影響下的北周宗室發(fā)展變化狀況,以及宗室對北周政局的影響。北周宗室勢力的變化與同時期的主相之爭密切相關(guān)。在北周前期相權(quán)主導(dǎo)時期,宗室勢力基本呈上升趨勢;皇權(quán)振興之后,其發(fā)展軌跡始現(xiàn)波折:政治權(quán)力整體縮減,已完全無法與皇權(quán)對抗,甚至在后期開始下滑。在主相之爭中,權(quán)臣與皇帝出于不同利益,對宗室采取不同態(tài)度,或大力發(fā)展,或有限任用,或予以打擊,對宗室勢力的消長有很大影響。同時宗室成員在主相之爭中,鑒于權(quán)臣不同的出身身份,立場各異,或支持皇權(quán),或支持相權(quán),或協(xié)調(diào)主相關(guān)系,或搖擺不定,這對主相勝負(fù)至關(guān)重要。在北周前期的主相之爭中,宇文護(hù)身兼宗室與權(quán)臣雙重身份,在宗室中一家獨(dú)大,但北周前期皇權(quán)的低迷主要是由于權(quán)臣當(dāng)政而非宗室勢大。因此在武帝剿滅宇文護(hù)余黨時,宗室未遭大規(guī)模屠戮,這使得北周不同于魏晉南北朝的其他朝代,在皇權(quán)復(fù)振后發(fā)生大規(guī)模骨肉相殘的悲劇。不過由于宣帝過度強(qiáng)化皇權(quán),不僅限制強(qiáng)大宗室的發(fā)展,而且為外戚楊堅(jiān)上位創(chuàng)造了條件,北周后期再次出現(xiàn)主相相爭的局面。在此過程中,北周宗室基本成為了皇權(quán)的代表,試圖維護(hù)皇權(quán),對抗相權(quán)。但宗室受自身實(shí)力所限,對楊堅(jiān)的反抗從中央到地方無一成功,最終難以發(fā)揮很大的作用,無法挽回北周皇權(quán)及宗室衰敗的命運(yùn)。
[Abstract]:The purpose of this paper is to discuss the development and change of the clan under the influence of the imperial power and phase power of the Northern Zhou Dynasty, and the influence of the clan on the political situation of the Northern Zhou Dynasty. The change of clan forces in the Northern Zhou Dynasty is closely related to the main struggle in the same period. In the early Northern Zhou Dynasty, the patriarchal power basically showed an upward trend; after the rejuvenation of the imperial power, its development trajectory began to twists and downs: the overall reduction of political power, completely unable to confront the imperial power, and even began to decline in the later period. In the dispute between the chief minister and the emperor, for different interests, they adopted different attitudes towards the clan, or vigorously developed, or limited appointment, or cracked down, which had a great influence on the growth and decline of the clan power. At the same time, the clan members in the dispute between the principal, in view of the different origins of the subjects, different positions, either to support the imperial power, or support the power, or to coordinate the relationship between the master, or wavering, which is crucial to the victory and defeat of the principal. In the early period of Northern Zhou Dynasty, Yu Wen-Shu's dual status of family and minister was the dominant one. However, the depression of imperial power in the early Northern Zhou Dynasty was mainly due to the government of the government rather than the power of the patriarchal family in the early Northern Zhou Dynasty, which was the main reason of the decline of imperial power in the early period of Northern Zhou Dynasty. Therefore, when Emperor Wu destroyed Yuwen Huyu Party, the clan was not slaughtered on a large scale, which made the Northern Zhou Dynasty different from the other dynasties in the Wei, Jin and Southern and Northern dynasties, after the restoration of imperial power, there was a large-scale tragedy of bone mutilation. However, due to the excessive strengthening of imperial power, not only restricted the development of a powerful clan, but also created conditions for the ascendancy of Yang Jian, the late North Zhou Dynasty again appeared in the situation of the main struggle. In this process, the clan of the Northern Zhou Dynasty basically became the representative of the imperial power, trying to maintain the imperial power and fight against the mutual power. But the clan limited by its own strength, Yang Jian's resistance from the central to the local none of the success, ultimately difficult to play a great role, unable to recover the Northern Zhou Dynasty imperial power and the decline of the fate of the clan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K239.25

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李憑;;《北史》中的宗族與北朝歷史系統(tǒng)——兼論中華文明長存不衰的歷史原因[J];中國社會科學(xué);2016年05期

2 孫正軍;;禪讓行事官小考[J];史學(xué)集刊;2015年02期

3 曾磊;;周武帝、周宣帝親信人物與軍權(quán)[J];鞍山師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2013年03期

4 曾磊;;賀拔勝集團(tuán)考辨[J];邢臺學(xué)院學(xué)報;2012年01期

5 韓f;;從《陰云墓志》論周隋之際的政局[J];碑林集刊;2009年00期

6 王永興;;論北周武帝宇文邕[J];文史知識;2009年06期

7 石冬梅;;論北周的御正和內(nèi)史[J];唐都學(xué)刊;2006年02期

8 李鴻賓;尉遲迥事變及其結(jié)局——新舊時代轉(zhuǎn)變的表征[J];西北民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期

9 楊翠微;西魏北周政治斗爭與中央集權(quán)之加強(qiáng)[J];中國文化研究;2003年04期

10 韓f;隋文帝弒君與被弒說考證[J];學(xué)術(shù)研究;2000年02期

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 羅凱;;御正與納言——兼論中書門下體制之源[A];述往而通古今，知史以明大道——第七屆北京大學(xué)史學(xué)論壇論文集[C];2011年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王玉來;承續(xù)與更始：隋代統(tǒng)一進(jìn)程中的地域集團(tuán)與政治整合[D];華東師范大學(xué);2013年

2 冀英俊;隋朝君臣關(guān)系研究[D];南開大學(xué);2013年

3 徐成;北朝隋唐內(nèi)侍制度研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年

4 薛海波;5-6世紀(jì)北邊六鎮(zhèn)豪強(qiáng)酋帥社會地位演變研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 周鼎;唐代宗室的政治生態(tài)及變遷[D];華東師范大學(xué);2012年

2 蒙海亮;周隋總管府研究[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

3 李民剛;關(guān)隴集團(tuán)形成研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

4 蘇相禹;宇文氏婚姻與魏周隋政治[D];鄭州大學(xué);2010年

5 姜望來;魏周隋唐關(guān)隴集團(tuán)與山東勢力[D];武漢大學(xué);2005年

6 鐘盛;關(guān)隴本地豪族與西魏北周政治[D];武漢大學(xué);2004年

，

本文編號：2458221