六朝士族家訓(xùn)思想研究
[Abstract]:In the six dynasties, the family training developed with the prosperity of family education, and became one of the important forms of family education. Family training is the main content of the moral education, the subject of the admonition is mainly the children and the late generation with the education obligation. Although there is no strict family training in strict sense, in the day-to-day training, the main body of the family training is made consciously, and the meaning of the family is becoming more and more obvious. The practical function of family training in the education of the family, the most important standard is the practice of the commandgers. According to the analysis and statistics of the existing historical materials, the observance or violation of the domestic training by the trainees is almost half the case. in which, as a result of the fact that the family training is more likely to be accepted and complied with by the rectus due to the practical benefits, the day-to-day family training, which is the subject of moral precepts, is more complex to the factors that are subject to or contrary to the subject, from the existing materials, The role model effect and the influence on his son are the main factors that affect the subject. A large number of negative examples show that this period of family training is not binding on the children and is not strong, and the family training is more like a kind of expectation of the parents to the children, and is not a major way of education. The family training of the family also reflects the thought and style of the exservists themselves. Although the family training of the six dynasties is often the main goal, but in fact there is quite a part of the author of the family, in the family training, the plan and the idea of the thought, and hope that the children can make it. But its concept and aim are far and far away and the problem of fuzzy is weakened, especially the concept of the family country in the family training is the most obvious, which embodies the concession of the domestic training to the utility and the utility in the real environment. This characteristic is also reflected in the absorption of the Buddhist thought. These have shown that, while the six-year-old scholar, in his family training, has the content of his or her moral integrity, the family's training has always been to preserve the family and make it a long-term and final purpose.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:K23
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 閻續(xù)瑞;;論魏晉南北朝士大夫家訓(xùn)的時代特征[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期
2 孟繁冶;;從誡子書看魏晉士人心態(tài)[J];文史哲;2006年04期
3 閻續(xù)瑞;從魏晉南北朝文人家訓(xùn)看其理想人格的建構(gòu)與實踐[J];河南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2004年02期
4 張白茹,李必友;魏晉南北朝家誡論略[J];安徽史學(xué);2002年03期
5 李必友;魏晉南北朝家族教育的特點[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文社會科學(xué)版);1999年02期
6 曹建平;魏晉南北朝家庭教育鉤稽[J];湘潭師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);1998年02期
7 蔡雁彬;;漢魏六朝誡子書研究[J];古典文學(xué)知識;1997年02期
8 馬玉山;“家訓(xùn)”“家誡”的盛行與儒學(xué)的普及傳播[J];孔子研究;1993年04期
9 余英時;;王僧虔《誡子書》與南朝清談考辨[J];中國文化;1993年01期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 邵正坤;;試論北朝時期的家庭教育[A];紀(jì)念《教育史研究》創(chuàng)刊二十周年論文集(3)——中國教育制度史研究[C];2009年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 柳稱;魏晉南北朝時期家庭教育研究[D];南開大學(xué);2014年
2 閆續(xù)瑞;漢唐之際帝王、士大夫家訓(xùn)研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2004年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 薛熠煥;魏晉誡子書研究[D];華東師范大學(xué);2011年
,本文編號:2435074
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2435074.html