【摘要】： 史官制度是我國史學(xué)的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng),但有遼一代因文獻(xiàn)之不足,故對(duì)遼代史官制度的研究,前輩學(xué)人涉獵者甚少,故本文擬對(duì)有遼一代的史官制度進(jìn)行全面研究,欲盡窺有遼一代史官制度之全貌。 本文通過全面考述有遼一代史官制度的淵源、修史機(jī)構(gòu)的建制和演變,對(duì)遼代史官制度的基本概況進(jìn)行深入探討。通過對(duì)國史院、起居舍人院、著作局等修史機(jī)構(gòu)和史官考證,分析其任免、職責(zé)及其特點(diǎn),探討遼代史官制度的運(yùn)行機(jī)制,展現(xiàn)遼代修史之盛況、史學(xué)之發(fā)展。研究表明,有遼一代相對(duì)完善的史官制度,創(chuàng)造了勝于金元的史學(xué)成就,并具有史官多為兼職且職責(zé)多樣化的特點(diǎn),其史學(xué)思想及史學(xué)觀念具有同源共祖的民族觀等的共性特征,同時(shí)傳承了史官秉筆直書的優(yōu)良傳統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:The historian system is a fine tradition of the history of the country, but the Liao Dynasty is not enough for the literature, so it is very little to study the history of Liao Dynasty, so it is proposed to carry out a comprehensive study on the system of the history of the Liao Dynasty, and to see the whole picture of the system of the history of the Liao Dynasty. Through the comprehensive examination of the origin of the system of the history of Liao Dynasty and the formation and evolution of the history institution, this paper deeply studies the basic situation of the system of the history of Liao Dynasty. In this paper, the paper discusses the mechanism of the system of the history of Liao Dynasty, and displays the conditions of the history of Liao Dynasty and the history of the history of Liao Dynasty. The research shows that there is a relatively perfect system of historical officials in the Liao Dynasty, which has created a history achievement better than that of Jin Yuan, and has the characteristics that the history officer is a part-time job and the job is diversified, and the history thought and the history idea have the common ancestor's national view and so on. The character of nature, at the same time, inherit the good of the history of the history of the written book.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K246.1;D691.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 竇曉光;論漢唐的史官和檔案工作[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1987年06期

2 竇曉光;論漢唐的史官和檔案工作(續(xù)完)[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1988年01期

3 倪道善;論古代的史權(quán)[J];檔案學(xué)通訊;1996年02期

4 張博泉;“契丹”、“遼”名稱探源[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;1999年04期

5 趙彥昌;;遼代修史研究[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2007年04期

6 夏詩荷;唐初設(shè)館修史原因考論[J];華夏文化;2002年04期

7 劉鳳翥;;契丹小字解讀再探[J];考古學(xué)報(bào);1983年02期

8 朱子方;遼朝的歷史學(xué)家及其史學(xué)思想[J];遼海文物學(xué)刊;1995年01期

9 倪道善;;古代史館述評(píng)[J];歷史教學(xué);1988年08期

10 王和生;隋唐以后史官建置與沿革述略[J];遼寧師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：2434641