【摘要】：《左傳》存在著民間傳本與秘府藏本兩種系統(tǒng)。兩種系統(tǒng)之間應(yīng)當(dāng)存在著較大的差異。民間傳本有不少的殘缺部分。一些學(xué)者認(rèn)為今本《左傳》之前有一個(gè)完整的“原本”。秘府藏本因劉歆的努力而立于學(xué)官,始顯于世。劉歆《左傳》學(xué)派是新莽之后整個(gè)東漢《左傳》學(xué)的主干。這個(gè)主導(dǎo)地位最終導(dǎo)致了《左傳》秘府藏本的通行和民間傳本的晦沒(méi)。賈誼一系民間傳本在陳元做了一番帶有總結(jié)性的工作后,遂至浸微�！蹲髠鳌返膬煞N系統(tǒng)就其初始而言,都屬古文本。然而其趨勢(shì)則是今文轉(zhuǎn)寫本漸漸增多,因?yàn)橹挥卸嘁越裎霓D(zhuǎn)寫方能較大規(guī)模地流行民間。古文本《左傳》當(dāng)消亡于唐宋之際。
[Abstract]:There are two systems of folk biography and secret house collection. There should be great differences between the two systems. There are many incomplete parts in the folklore. Some scholars believe that there is a complete original before this Zuo Zhuan. Secret House Tibetan because of Liu Xin's efforts and stand in the school officials, before the world. Liu Xin Zuo Zhuan School was the backbone of the whole Eastern Han Dynasty. This dominant position eventually led to the passage of secret collections and the obscurity of folk biographies. After Chen Yuan had done some summative work, the two systems of "Zuo Zhuan" were ancient texts. However, the trend is that the number of today's manuscripts is increasing, because only more of them can be popular among the folk on a large scale. The ancient text Zuo Zhuan died out in the Tang and Song dynasties.
【作者單位】： 武漢大學(xué)文學(xué)院
【分類號(hào)】：K204

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 常金倉(cāng);;《穆天子傳》的時(shí)代和文獻(xiàn)性質(zhì)[A];周秦社會(huì)與文化研究——紀(jì)念中國(guó)先秦史學(xué)會(huì)成立20周年學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2002年

2 王俊潮;楊定;;蜚”、“，

本文編號(hào)：2384282