【摘要】：康熙歷獄審訊開始后,清廷官員首先以"謀叛"和"妖書"等罪名審訊湯若望等人,并判處湯若望傳播邪教、編造新書惑眾的罪名成立。然而這一判決卻因順治帝曾經對湯若望的公開褒獎而難以執(zhí)行,清廷才轉而以誤用洪范五行選擇榮親王葬期判處湯若望等人�？滴鯕v獄不是因選擇榮親王葬期而發(fā)生的擇日之爭,卻是輔政大臣陷害湯若望的政治斗爭。
[Abstract]:After the trial of Kang Xi-li prison, Qing government officials first tried Tang Ruowang and others on charges of "conspiracy" and "evil book," and sentenced Tang Ruowang to spread a cult and fabricate a new book to confuse the public. However, this judgment was difficult to carry out because of the public praise of Tang Ruowang by Emperor Shunzhi, so the Qing government instead sentenced Tang Ruowang and others for his misusing Hong Fan's five elements to choose the burial period of Prince Tang Ruowang. Kang Xi-li prison was not due to the choice of the burial period of Prince Rong, but because of the political struggle of the Minister of Foreign Affairs to frame Tang Ruowang.
【作者單位】： 鄭州大學歷史學院;
【基金】：國家社科基金后期資助項目:明清之際中西歷法之爭再研究(項目編號:15FZS046)
【分類號】：K249.2
，

本文編號：2367506