【摘要】：通過比勘《文宗閣〈四庫全書〉裝函清冊(cè)》與其他各閣書目及《四庫全書總目》《四庫全書簡明目錄》中書籍名稱及類目排序的差別,可以判斷《裝函清冊(cè)》并非偽作,并從《裝函清冊(cè)》著錄的書籍、避諱和補(bǔ)函情況推測抄寫于嘉慶時(shí)期。作為文宗閣《四庫全書》的劫余之物,該清冊(cè)具有極高的史料價(jià)值,將其與陳垣抄錄的文津閣書籍函數(shù)進(jìn)行比勘,發(fā)現(xiàn)兩閣在書籍裝函、合函等方面存在差異,可進(jìn)行比較研究。
[Abstract]:By comparing the differences between the book titles and the sort of categories in the book catalogs of Wenzongge < Siku > and other cabinet bibliographies and the contents of < Sikuquan], we can judge that the catalogue of packing letters is not a false one. And from the book, taboo and supplementary letter presumably copied in Jiaqing period. As the robber of Wenzong Pavilion "Siku Guanshu", the inventory has very high historical material value. By comparing it with the Wenzinku's book function copied by Chen Yuan, it is found that there are differences between the two pavilions in the aspects of books, letters, and so on. A comparative study can be carried out.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院清史研究所;中國人民大學(xué)歷史學(xué)院;
【基金】：“中國人民大學(xué)2016年度拔尖創(chuàng)新人才培育資助計(jì)劃”成果
【分類號(hào)】：K249.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張占生;;文津閣[J];紫禁城;1981年03期

2 別廷峰;乾隆御制碑文《文津閣記》[J];承德師專學(xué)報(bào);1982年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2349202