【摘要】：唐玄宗時期對于官吏的懲處,雖然與唐律的規(guī)定有關(guān),但實(shí)際情況卻涉及對皇權(quán)的維護(hù)及權(quán)力斗爭。本文的落腳之處在于后者,而非法律條文的規(guī)定。唐玄宗統(tǒng)治前期,勵精圖治,嚴(yán)格治吏,社會發(fā)展至鼎盛階段。開元二十四年以后,玄宗怠于政事,一心享樂,不再嚴(yán)于整飭吏治,使得權(quán)臣猖狂,吏治敗壞,以致引發(fā)安史之亂。 除去緒論、結(jié)語外,本文分為三大部分： 第一章敘述開元前中期的官吏懲治。筆者選取姚崇和張說作為兩個代表人物,來論述官吏懲治對皇權(quán)維護(hù)的作用。姚崇的上臺是唐玄宗將功臣外任、撥亂反正的結(jié)果；姚崇被罷免宰相不僅因?yàn)樗v容兒子、屬下貪贓,而且出于玄宗對時局的考慮。張說的上臺是唐玄宗大興文治的需要,后來因?yàn)樨澵?cái)、與宇文融不合,被彈劾引術(shù)士占星而下臺。大體而言,開元前中期,由于唐玄宗銳意進(jìn)取、勤于政事,其采取的官吏黜陟措施發(fā)揮了維護(hù)政權(quán)穩(wěn)定的效果。 第二章討論開元二十四年的變化。這一年是唐玄宗由明變昏的轉(zhuǎn)折年,也是大唐王朝由盛轉(zhuǎn)衰的漸變年。一方面,唐玄宗本人開始不顧政事、及時行樂；另一方面,耿直的文臣張九齡因?yàn)榻Y(jié)黨案被貶黜,機(jī)變的李林甫則成為首席宰相。李林甫既修訂了一些律令格式,為唐王朝提供制度等保障,又出于私人目的打擊異己,使朝廷無人敢進(jìn)言。 第三章論述開元后期、天寶年間的官吏懲治。這一階段,李林甫一邊掀起幾次大案打壓太子李亨,一邊鏟除有可能威脅自己相位的韋堅(jiān)、楊慎矜等人。而李林甫死后反被楊國忠清算。綜觀唐玄宗朝官吏懲治的情況,可知,官吏的懲治雖然與律文的規(guī)定有關(guān),更重要的是,受到皇帝意志、官場斗爭、時局變化的影響。
[Abstract]:The punishment of officials in the period of Tang Xuanzong was related to the regulations of the Tang Dynasty, but the actual situation was related to the maintenance of imperial power and the struggle for power. This article is settled in the latter, not the provisions of the law. In the early period of Tang Xuanzong's rule, the society developed to the peak stage. Twenty-four years after Kaiyuan, Xuanzong labored in politics and enjoyed himself. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper is divided into three parts: the first chapter describes the punishment of officials before and in the middle of Kaiyuan. The author chooses Yao Chong and Zhang Shuo as two representative figures to discuss the role of official punishment in the maintenance of imperial power. Yao Chong's coming to power was the result of Tang Xuanzong taking over his meritorious position and setting things right. Yao Chong was dismissed not only because he connived at his son and his subordinates, but also because of Xuanzong's consideration of the current situation. Zhang said that came to power is the need of Tang Xuanzong Daxing Wenzhi, and later because of greed, and Yu Wenrong incompatible, impeached warlock astrology and stepped down. Generally speaking, before and in the middle of Kaiyuan, because Tang Xuanzong was enterprising and diligent in political affairs, the measures taken by his officials to depose and control the government exerted the effect of maintaining the stability of the regime. The second chapter discusses the change of Kaiyuan twenty-four years. This year was the turning point of Tang Xuanzong from Ming to faint, and it was also the gradual change of Tang Dynasty from prosperity to decline. On the one hand, Tang Xuanzong himself began to disrespect political affairs and enjoy himself. On the other hand, Zhang Jiuling, the upright minister, was deposed because of the party formation case, and Li Linfu, who had changed by chance, became the prime minister. Li Linfu not only revised some laws and regulations to provide the Tang Dynasty with protection such as system, but also attacked dissidents for personal purposes, so that no one dared to speak out. The third chapter discusses the later period of Kaiyuan, Tianbao government officials punishment. At this stage, Li Linfu raised several major cases to suppress Prince Li Heng, while eliminating Wei Jian, Yang Shen-jin and others who might threaten his own aspect. After Li's death, he was liquidated by Yang Guozhong. Judging from the punishment of officials in Xuanzong Dynasty in Tang Dynasty, it can be seen that the punishment of officials is affected by the will of the emperor, the struggle of the officialdom and the changes of the current situation, although the punishment of the officials is related to the provisions of the law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K242;D691.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉俊文;唐律與禮的關(guān)系試析[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1983年05期

2 劉俊文;論唐后期法制的變化[J];北京大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1986年02期

3 陳宏;;唐代懲治貪賄犯罪的立法及其實(shí)施[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 陳宏;;唐代吏治法律制度分析[J];重慶師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2010年02期

5 王志東;;論唐玄宗開元二十四年[J];長沙理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2008年02期

6 楊武松;唐代官制特權(quán)立法考辯[J];太原城市職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

7 李玉生;;唐代法律體系研究[J];法學(xué)家;2004年05期

8 王立民;唐律實(shí)施問題探究[J];法學(xué);1990年10期

9 范寶華;;從唐律看唐朝從嚴(yán)治吏[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下旬刊);2009年10期

10 張欣;;中國法制與國之福祉的聯(lián)系——從唐代的官吏制度淺析[J];法制與社會;2011年21期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 任士英;唐玄、肅之際中樞政局研究[D];首都師范大學(xué);2001年

2 郝黎;唐代官吏懲治研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 王學(xué)澤;論唐代法律對官吏的監(jiān)督管理[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年

2 龔曙東;試論唐朝法律中政府的地位[D];湘潭大學(xué);2004年

3 章雪峰;《大唐六典》研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年

4 何春明;唐代京官貶黜初探[D];中央民族大學(xué);2005年

5 邊媛;唐代后期法制演變初探[D];中國政法大學(xué);2005年

6 劉希烈;唐律實(shí)施論析[D];吉林大學(xué);2006年

7 王莉;唐代懲貪法律制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2006年

8 尹柏蘇;唐代官吏贓罪研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

9 賈浩;唐代防治官吏貪瀆對策研究[D];鄭州大學(xué);2007年

10 梁作福;唐玄宗朝京官外貶流放問題初探[D];天津師范大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2341867