【摘要】："圣相"李沆與"險(xiǎn)薄"的梅詢構(gòu)成了歷史書寫中宋真宗時(shí)代的正反兩種形象,眾多筆記小說也敷衍出一個(gè)個(gè)展現(xiàn)梅詢惡劣品行的"生動(dòng)"故事。實(shí)際上,梅詢與李沆的沖突主要因?yàn)?梅詢直率敢言與李沆忍讓退避的個(gè)人性情相異,梅詢急切求變與李沆無為而治的政治理念相舛,梅詢保衛(wèi)靈州與李沆放棄靈州的軍事策略相違。李沆所譴責(zé)的梅詢、曾致堯、李夷庚皆是張齊賢一黨,李沆指責(zé)梅詢"險(xiǎn)薄"的背后是宋真宗咸平年間李沆、張齊賢兩個(gè)權(quán)力集團(tuán)的明爭(zhēng)暗斗。
[Abstract]:Li Kang and Mei Xun constitute the positive and negative images of the Song Dynasty in historical writing, and many note-taking novels show the "vivid" stories of Mei Xun's bad behavior one by one. In fact, the conflict between Mei Xun and Li Kang is mainly due to the fact that Mei Shue's outspoken and outspoken nature is different from Li Kang's personal disposition, and that Mei Xun's eagerness for change and Li Kang's political philosophy of ruling without doing anything are ill-fated. Mei-he defends Lingzhou against Li Kang's military strategy of abandoning Lingzhou. Li Kang accused Mei Xun, Zeng Zhiyao, and Li Yigeng of Zhang Qixian as a party. Li Kang accused Mei of being "dangerous and thin" behind the struggle between Li Kang and Zhang Qixian, two power groups in the Xianping years of Song Zhenzong.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)文學(xué)與新聞學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K244

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 鐘叔河;;更快活[J];雜文選刊(下旬版);2009年03期

2 朱春學(xué);;志要豪華,趣要淡泊[J];國學(xué);2012年07期

3 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 玫昆侖;治理公車私用要學(xué)“問責(zé)梅詢”[N];湖北日?qǐng)?bào);2014年

，

本文編號(hào)：2295998