【摘要】：鄭命壽,滿文名“Gūlmahūn”,本為朝鮮平安道殷山縣賤隸,“薩爾滸之役”隨姜弘立出征后金被俘。由于其通曉朝鮮語,因而受后金的重用,多次擔任出使朝鮮的通事。在清朝征朝鮮“丙子之役”兩國議和過程中,從中積極溝通、斡旋,發(fā)揮了十分重要的作用,因而受到清廷的信任,在出使朝鮮時,被任命為代表清朝國家的敕使。鄭命壽作為投降清朝的朝鮮籍的外交官,在清初清鮮關系中扮有特殊的角色,對后金(清)而言,他憑借自己獨特的語言優(yōu)勢,以及對自己國家朝鮮的熟悉,為清朝建立起一個情報網(wǎng)絡,凡朝鮮國內(nèi)任何反清舉動,都無法逃脫鄭命壽的耳目,成為清朝控制朝鮮的有力幫手。另一方面,由于他出身低賤,借出使朝鮮之際,依仗清廷的政治權(quán)勢,為自己家鄉(xiāng)及家族謀取各種利益,甚至是毫無止境,從而與朝鮮君臣產(chǎn)生矛盾,鄭雷卿事件正是這種矛盾的反映。對朝鮮而言,鄭命壽是數(shù)典忘祖的叛徒,但攝于清朝國威及受朝鮮國內(nèi)抗清勢力影響,只得對其忍氣吞聲。本文以按照時間脈絡,分三個部分探討清鮮交涉中的鄭命壽:第一章為皇太極時期的鄭命壽。通過分析丙子議和與“鄭雷卿事件”中鄭命壽發(fā)揮的作用,得出鄭命壽在這一時期的清鮮交涉中由最初的嶄露頭角到逐漸加深影響。第二章為順治時期的鄭命壽。隨著新帝的即位,鄭命壽越發(fā)受到重視,開始擔任敕使,清入關后鄭命壽更承擔起征糧朝鮮的任務。第三章為鄭命壽參與六使詰責與多爾袞征女朝鮮事件。這是多爾袞利用鄭命壽等人對朝鮮需索無度、欺壓屬國的表現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Zheng Xiangshou, the Manchu name "G lmah Li", originally for the North Korean Ping'an Road Yin Shan County, "Salhu Battle" with Jiang Hongli after the capture of Jin. As a result of its knowledge of Korean, it was reused by the late Kim, many times as missions to North Korea. In the process of negotiation between the two countries during the Qing Dynasty's "Battle of the third son", positive communication and mediation played a very important role, so they were trusted by the Qing government, and were appointed as emissaries on behalf of the Qing Dynasty when they sent to Korea. As a Korean diplomat who surrendered to the Qing Dynasty, Zheng Xiangshou played a special role in the relations between the Qing Dynasty and the fresh Qing Dynasty. For the later Jin Dynasty, he relied on his unique linguistic advantages and familiarity with his own country, North Korea. To set up an intelligence network for the Qing Dynasty, any anti-Qing action in North Korea could not escape the eyes and ears of Zheng Hongshou and became a powerful helper in the Qing Dynasty's control of North Korea. On the other hand, as a result of his humble birth, he lent out Korea, relying on the political power of the Qing government to pursue various interests for his hometown and his family, or even endless, thus creating contradictions with the Korean monarchs. Zheng Lei Qing incident is a reflection of this contradiction. To North Korea, Zheng Hongshou was a traitor who forgot his ancestors, but in the Qing Dynasty and under the influence of the anti-Qing forces in North Korea, he had to swallow it. In this paper, according to the time context, three parts to explore the Qing Xianshou negotiations: the first chapter is the Huangtai period Zheng Hongshou. Based on the analysis of the role played by Zheng Xiangshou in Xianghe and Zheng Lei Qing incident, it is concluded that Zheng Xiangshou gradually deepened his influence from the initial emergence to the gradual deepening in the clear and fresh negotiations in this period. The second chapter is the Shunzhi period Zheng Hongshou. With the accession of the new emperor, Zheng Hongshou became more and more important and began to serve as an emissary. After the Qing Dynasty's entry into the Customs, Zheng Hongshou took on the task of collecting grain for North Korea. The third chapter is the participation of Zheng Xiangshou in the incident of Liu Chen and Duoergen's conquest of Korean women. This is the use of Dauergun Zheng Shengshou and others to demand unlimited North Korea, bullying the state performance.
【學位授予單位】：東北師范大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K249

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 桂濤;;“丁卯之役”后金鮮實質(zhì)矛盾探析[J];史林;2015年05期

2 陳尚勝;;朝貢制度與東亞地區(qū)傳統(tǒng)國際秩序——以16-19世紀的明清王朝為中心[J];中國邊疆史地研究;2015年02期

3 李善洪;;清對朝鮮“蠲弊”問題管窺——以《同文匯考》為中心[J];北華大學學報(社會科學版);2015年02期

4 尤旭東;;遙領芝告向東藩——清朝出使朝鮮使臣研究[J];故宮博物院院刊;2014年06期

5 陳躍;;清政府對越界朝鮮人民之管理[J];明清論叢;2014年02期

6 石少穎;;“存亡歧路”抑或“話語權(quán)相爭”——“丙子斥和”及“三學士”事件述評[J];安徽史學;2014年02期

7 石少穎;;從“鄭雷卿案”看沈館朝鮮陪臣的抗清活動[J];韓國研究論叢;2012年01期

8 徐雪梅;丁維國;;淺議清朝的“通事”[J];黑河學院學報;2011年01期

9 石少穎;;“名分外交”的困境——以朝鮮仁祖時期“斥和”與“主和”論爭為中心[J];蘭州學刊;2010年07期

10 石少穎;;從“鄭雷卿案”看早期清鮮關系[J];社會科學輯刊;2010年03期

相關博士學位論文 前3條

1 玄花;沈館宗藩外交研究（1637-1644）[D];吉林大學;2013年

2 陳放;朝鮮與女真、滿族諸政權(quán)關系變遷研究[D];延邊大學;2012年

3 馮正玉;17-19世紀朝鮮對清貿(mào)易研究[D];吉林大學;2011年

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 柴妙甜;試論滿洲八旗中的朝鮮人[D];延邊大學;2015年

2 婁巍;皇太極時期清朝就朝鮮潛通明朝的交涉研究[D];山東大學;2008年

3 劉雪;清鮮關系中的歲幣研究[D];山東大學;2006年

，

本文編號：2252746