【摘要】：正讀書受益,本有很多種,有的書給人以啟發(fā),有的書敘述事情的原委,有的書示人以可用的材料,有的書則直接告訴我們:書不可以這樣寫。吳天墀先生的書,屬于第一種,不分專業(yè),皆開卷有益。其言傳亦然,不論何人,有緣即有所悟。先生后來得名,似乎多靠那本《西夏史稿》。其實先生的學術視野一向廣闊,西夏史僅是他在特殊環(huán)境下的"業(yè)余寫作",不過小試牛刀而已。蓋先生雖從少年時就關注西藏,又曾身往西康,西夏史卻非其所素習,真正用心用力的時間,也就幾年而已。正如其高足劉復生兄所說,
[Abstract]:There are many kinds of books, some books give people inspiration, some books describe things, some books show people with available materials, some books directly tell us that books can not be written like this. Wu Tianchi's book, belongs to the first kind, regardless of profession, all opens the book to be beneficial. The same is true of his words, no matter who, the fate of the understanding. Sir got his name later, seems to rely on that copy of the history of the West Xia. In fact, his academic field of vision has always been broad, the history of Xixia is only his "amateur writing" under the special circumstances, but only a test knife. Although Mr. Gui had been concerned about Tibet since he was a teenager, he had gone to Xikang, but the history of Xixia was not his practice, and the time he really worked hard was only a few years. As his elder brother Liu Fusheng said,
【分類號】：K207

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 羅志田;;與時代和社會相感應——紀念吳天墀先生[J];讀書;2013年11期

2 ;四川省文史研究館文史學家簡介——吳天墀先生[J];文史雜志;1993年02期

3 牛繼曾;;北方“虎王”吳天墀[J];春秋;1994年02期

4 劉復生;《吳天墀文史存稿》讀后[J];中國史研究;1999年04期

5 羅志田;;為史學開出光煥之新景——紀念通儒吳天墀先生[J];四川大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年02期

6 楊正苞;我讀《吳天墀文史存稿》[J];文史雜志;1999年02期

7 張邦煒;讀《吳天墀文史存稿》[J];西南民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年S6期

8 羅志田;;目光四射的史學大家——吳天墀先生學述[J];讀書;2013年12期

9 曉墻;吳天墀和他的《文史存稿》[J];文史雜志;1998年06期

10 牛達生;再談《大夏國葬舍利碣銘》的撰寫時間——與吳天墀先生商榷[J];寧夏大學學報(社會科學版);1986年03期

，

本文編號：2175703