1721-1751年西藏世俗貴族力量的崛起和影響
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-28 17:56
【摘要】：1721-1751年西藏世俗貴族政治局面是西藏政體發(fā)展過程中較為特殊的一段歷史時期。自13世紀以來,西藏地方政體的最突出特點即是任何政權或地方政治力量均直接依托于宗教教派組織而存在�？梢哉f宗教教派組織成為一切政權和政治力量的基本載體,而政權和政治力量也往往直接為其所依附的宗教教派組織謀取利益。因此在這樣的歷史背景下,宗教人物往往在這種政治格局中扮演著政治權力的代言者。特別是在五世達賴喇嘛時期,格魯派宗教力量與蒙古軍事力量的聯(lián)盟,確立了格魯派寺院集團在西藏的統(tǒng)治地位。而清朝“興黃教,以安眾蒙古”的政策,更是對西藏宗教力量的推崇達到了極至。在這種巨大的宗教權勢沖擊下,世俗貴族力量始終處于邊緣化。隨著1717年準噶爾勢力入侵西藏、1720年清軍入藏剿滅準噶爾勢力后,清朝結束了利用蒙古勢力間接管理西藏的政治局面,進一步推行政教分離的政治策略,大力扶持西藏世俗貴族,開啟了世俗貴族掌政的歷史新局面,由此實現(xiàn)清朝對西藏地方的直接統(tǒng)治。從1721年噶倫聯(lián)合掌政到1751年郡王制的徹底瓦解,世俗貴族在清朝的大力扶持下,獨攬西藏地方政治權力長達三十年之久,這一時期以達賴喇嘛為代表的宗教集團力量基本被排斥于西藏政局之外。世俗貴族也正是利用這一有利的政治環(huán)境,實施了一系列的政治措施,使世俗貴族政治局面得到進一步的鞏固和發(fā)展。這也直接促使西藏地方的政治呈現(xiàn)出某種程度的世俗化傾向,并對西藏社會產(chǎn)生了深遠的影響。首先它不僅促進了西藏地方貴族等級制度的體系化,有限的維護了西藏社會的穩(wěn)定,同時也為日后世俗貴族階層政治勢力的發(fā)展創(chuàng)造了良好的條件,其次它為清朝對西藏地方統(tǒng)治體制從“政教分離”到“政教合一”的過渡產(chǎn)生了重要的影響,為后期西藏噶廈政府內部僧俗勢力互相牽制這一政治策略的形成奠定了堅實的基礎,最后它為清朝逐步加強中央集權,實現(xiàn)管理西藏直接化完創(chuàng)造了良好的條件。本論文以1721-1751年西藏世俗貴族政治局面的形成、發(fā)展及其瓦解為主要研究對象,通過簡單梳理世俗貴族在西藏各個歷史時期的政治發(fā)展道路,對這一階級的政治命運及政治功用進行了簡單的梳理與分析,特別是針對1721-1751年西藏世俗貴族領主與宗教集團之間的關系發(fā)展變化、前后藏世俗領主之間的矛盾發(fā)展演變以及清朝治藏政策的調整與完善對世俗貴族的影響等,作為本次研究的切入點,力爭客觀、詳實的世俗貴族這一階層的政治發(fā)展道路進行總結、分析家。本論文共分為四個章節(jié)進行撰寫,具體內容如下;第一章對世俗貴族在18世紀之前的政治發(fā)展道路進行了脈絡整理,分別對公元7-13世紀即吐蕃王朝與分治割據(jù)時期、以及薩迦,帕竹家族式政教合一體制、甘丹頗章政權前期這三個歷史時期為切入點,以當時西藏地方政體發(fā)展演變的大格局框架下,對世俗貴族這一階層的政治地位、以及政治力量的變化進行了簡要梳理及分析。第二章對1721-1727年世俗貴族政治局面的初步形成,進行脈絡梳理。對世俗貴族勢力如何把握害己同時重點對世俗貴族政治局面形成的原因以及在這一體制下,西藏地方政治權利的調整等進行了重點論述。其中更對世俗貴族矛盾的形成、發(fā)展,激化等進行了總結分析,并對衛(wèi)藏戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā)的原因和結果做了重點論述。第三章對1727-1751年世俗貴族政治局面的進一步鞏固進行了論述,以郡王制這一世俗貴族政權為對象,具體將其劃分為頗羅鼐及珠爾炠特那木扎勒執(zhí)政時期兩個階段,對其進行了歸納、分析。尤其針對不同時期僧俗矛盾的發(fā)展進行了重點論述,該章節(jié)同時也對世俗貴族政權的瓦解及其原因進行了總結分析。第四章對1721-1751年西藏政治世俗化對西藏社會產(chǎn)生的影響進行了重點論述,分別從促進貴族等級制度的體系化、有限維護西藏社會的穩(wěn)定及促使清朝對西藏統(tǒng)治體制的演變三個角度進行了重點論述。
[Abstract]:The political situation of the Tibet secular aristocracy in the past 1721-1751 years is a relatively special period in the course of the development of Tibet's political system. Since thirteenth Century, the most prominent feature of the Tibet local regime is that any political power or local political power is directly dependent on the Yu Zongjiao sectarian organization. It can be said that the religious sects have become all political and political organizations. The basic carrier of power and the political power and political power often directly benefit the religious sects attached to them. In this historical background, the religious figures often play the political power of the political power. Especially in the period of the fifth Darai Lama, the religious forces of the Georgia and the military power of Mongolia. The consortium established the ruling position of the Georgia monastery group in Tibet, while the policy of "Xing Huang Jiao and Mongolia" in the Qing Dynasty was the most admiration of the religious power of Tibet. Under the impact of the great religious power, the secular aristocracy was always marginalized. With the invasion of Tibet in 1717 and the Qing Dynasty in the Qing Dynasty, the Junggar forces were in the Qing Dynasty. After the military invasion and suppression of Junggar forces, the Qing Dynasty ended the political situation of the indirect administration of Tibet by the forces of Mongolia, further pushed the political strategy of separation of administrative education, supported the secular aristocracy of Tibet, opened a new situation in the history of the palmar of the secular aristocracy, and thus realized the direct rule of the Qing Dynasty to Tibet. By the complete disintegration of the system of the monarch in 1751, the secular aristocrats supported the Tibet local political power for thirty years under the support of the Qing Dynasty. The religious group power represented by the Darai Lama in this period was basically excluded from the political situation in Tibet. The secular aristocracy was also using this favorable political environment to implement a series of political conditions. Political measures have made the political situation of the secular aristocrats further consolidated and developed. This also directly promoted the politics of Tibet local politics to a certain degree of secularization and had a profound influence on the society of Tibet. First, it not only promoted the systematization of the rank system of the local nobility in Tibet, but also limited the stability of the Tibet society. At the same time, it also created good conditions for the development of the political power of the secular aristocracy in the future. Secondly, it had an important influence on the transition from "separation of politics and religion" to "unity of politics and education" in Tibet's local rule system in the Qing Dynasty, and laid the foundation for the formation of the political strategy of the monks and secular forces within the later Tibet government. In the end it created a good condition for the Qing Dynasty to strengthen centralization gradually and realize the direct management of Tibet in the Qing Dynasty. This paper took the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy in Tibet for 1721-1751 years, the development and disintegration of the political situation as the main research object, through a simple combing of the political development road of the secular aristocrats in each historical period of Tibet. The political destiny and political function of this class were briefly combed and analyzed, especially for the development and change of the relationship between the secular lords and the religious groups in Tibet in the past 1721-1751 years, the evolution of the contradictions between the secular lords and the secular leaders, as well as the adjustment and improvement of the policy of the Qing Dynasty to the secular aristocracy, and so on. The entry point of this study is to sum up the political development road of the secular aristocracy, which is objective and detailed. This paper is divided into four chapters, and the specific content is as follows. The first chapter collate the path of political development of the secular aristocracy before eighteenth Century, which is the king of Tubo in the 7-13 century, respectively. In the period of the secular separation between the Dynasty and the division, as well as the system of the family style of politics and religion of Sacha and Pampa, the three historical periods in the early period of the regime of the regime of Tibet were the breakthrough point. The political status of the secular aristocracy, as well as the change of political power, was briefly combed and analyzed under the framework of the development and evolution of the local regime at that time. Second In this chapter, the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocrats in the past 1721-1727 years was reviewed. The reasons for the political situation of the secular aristocracy and the reasons for the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy, as well as the adjustment of the local political rights under this system, were emphatically discussed. The formation and development of the contradictions of the secular aristocrats in Tibet were also discussed. The third chapter discusses the further consolidation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy in the 1727-1751 years, and takes the system of the secular aristocracy as the object of the system of the system of the secular aristocracy, and specifically divides it into two times in the period of the ruling period. At the stage, it has carried on the induction and analysis, especially aimed at the development of the contradiction of the monks and customs in different periods. The chapter also summarizes and analyzes the disintegration of the secular aristocracy and its reasons. The fourth chapter focuses on the influence of the secularization of Tibet's political secularization to the social production of Tibet in the 1721-1751 years, and the promotion of the political secularization of the secularization. The systematization of aristocratic hierarchy, the limited maintenance of social stability in Tibet and the three aspects of the Qing Dynasty's evolution of Tibet's governing system were discussed.
【學位授予單位】：西藏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K249
本文編號：2151147
[Abstract]:The political situation of the Tibet secular aristocracy in the past 1721-1751 years is a relatively special period in the course of the development of Tibet's political system. Since thirteenth Century, the most prominent feature of the Tibet local regime is that any political power or local political power is directly dependent on the Yu Zongjiao sectarian organization. It can be said that the religious sects have become all political and political organizations. The basic carrier of power and the political power and political power often directly benefit the religious sects attached to them. In this historical background, the religious figures often play the political power of the political power. Especially in the period of the fifth Darai Lama, the religious forces of the Georgia and the military power of Mongolia. The consortium established the ruling position of the Georgia monastery group in Tibet, while the policy of "Xing Huang Jiao and Mongolia" in the Qing Dynasty was the most admiration of the religious power of Tibet. Under the impact of the great religious power, the secular aristocracy was always marginalized. With the invasion of Tibet in 1717 and the Qing Dynasty in the Qing Dynasty, the Junggar forces were in the Qing Dynasty. After the military invasion and suppression of Junggar forces, the Qing Dynasty ended the political situation of the indirect administration of Tibet by the forces of Mongolia, further pushed the political strategy of separation of administrative education, supported the secular aristocracy of Tibet, opened a new situation in the history of the palmar of the secular aristocracy, and thus realized the direct rule of the Qing Dynasty to Tibet. By the complete disintegration of the system of the monarch in 1751, the secular aristocrats supported the Tibet local political power for thirty years under the support of the Qing Dynasty. The religious group power represented by the Darai Lama in this period was basically excluded from the political situation in Tibet. The secular aristocracy was also using this favorable political environment to implement a series of political conditions. Political measures have made the political situation of the secular aristocrats further consolidated and developed. This also directly promoted the politics of Tibet local politics to a certain degree of secularization and had a profound influence on the society of Tibet. First, it not only promoted the systematization of the rank system of the local nobility in Tibet, but also limited the stability of the Tibet society. At the same time, it also created good conditions for the development of the political power of the secular aristocracy in the future. Secondly, it had an important influence on the transition from "separation of politics and religion" to "unity of politics and education" in Tibet's local rule system in the Qing Dynasty, and laid the foundation for the formation of the political strategy of the monks and secular forces within the later Tibet government. In the end it created a good condition for the Qing Dynasty to strengthen centralization gradually and realize the direct management of Tibet in the Qing Dynasty. This paper took the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy in Tibet for 1721-1751 years, the development and disintegration of the political situation as the main research object, through a simple combing of the political development road of the secular aristocrats in each historical period of Tibet. The political destiny and political function of this class were briefly combed and analyzed, especially for the development and change of the relationship between the secular lords and the religious groups in Tibet in the past 1721-1751 years, the evolution of the contradictions between the secular lords and the secular leaders, as well as the adjustment and improvement of the policy of the Qing Dynasty to the secular aristocracy, and so on. The entry point of this study is to sum up the political development road of the secular aristocracy, which is objective and detailed. This paper is divided into four chapters, and the specific content is as follows. The first chapter collate the path of political development of the secular aristocracy before eighteenth Century, which is the king of Tubo in the 7-13 century, respectively. In the period of the secular separation between the Dynasty and the division, as well as the system of the family style of politics and religion of Sacha and Pampa, the three historical periods in the early period of the regime of the regime of Tibet were the breakthrough point. The political status of the secular aristocracy, as well as the change of political power, was briefly combed and analyzed under the framework of the development and evolution of the local regime at that time. Second In this chapter, the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocrats in the past 1721-1727 years was reviewed. The reasons for the political situation of the secular aristocracy and the reasons for the formation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy, as well as the adjustment of the local political rights under this system, were emphatically discussed. The formation and development of the contradictions of the secular aristocrats in Tibet were also discussed. The third chapter discusses the further consolidation of the political situation of the secular aristocracy in the 1727-1751 years, and takes the system of the secular aristocracy as the object of the system of the system of the secular aristocracy, and specifically divides it into two times in the period of the ruling period. At the stage, it has carried on the induction and analysis, especially aimed at the development of the contradiction of the monks and customs in different periods. The chapter also summarizes and analyzes the disintegration of the secular aristocracy and its reasons. The fourth chapter focuses on the influence of the secularization of Tibet's political secularization to the social production of Tibet in the 1721-1751 years, and the promotion of the political secularization of the secularization. The systematization of aristocratic hierarchy, the limited maintenance of social stability in Tibet and the three aspects of the Qing Dynasty's evolution of Tibet's governing system were discussed.
【學位授予單位】：西藏大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K249
【相似文獻】
相關期刊論文 前10條
1 梁成秀;從《頗羅鼐傳》看頗羅鼐的愛國統(tǒng)一思想[J];西藏民族學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2001年02期
2 曾國慶;論頗羅鼐文韜武略[J];西藏研究;2004年01期
3 陳志剛;;清代前期頗羅鼐總理藏政研究[J];東北師大學報;2006年03期
4 宋曉嵇;愛國的藏族英雄頗羅鼐[J];青海民族學院學報;1984年02期
5 蘇發(fā)祥;從藏文名著《頗羅鼐傳》中看頗羅鼐和寧瑪派之間的關系[J];西藏民族學院學報(社會科學版);1989年03期
6 扎洛;清宮檔案中有關頗羅鼐平息不丹內亂之史料[J];西藏研究;2004年04期
7 陳志剛;論清代前期頗羅鼐總理藏政的歷史原因[J];社會科學輯刊;2005年06期
8 曹自強;;藏族民族英雄頗羅鼐事跡述略[J];西藏研究;1986年01期
9 國慶;;頗羅鼐年譜[J];中國藏學;1992年02期
10 馬蘭;;清代西藏郡王頗羅鼐敬獻給雍和宮的兩尊佛像[J];藏學學刊;2004年00期
相關碩士學位論文 前4條
1 尼瑪倉覺（Nyima Tshanchod）;1721-1751年西藏世俗貴族力量的崛起和影響[D];西藏大學;2017年
2 陳志剛;頗羅鼐家族總理藏政與清朝治藏[D];吉林大學;2004年
3 張云;頗羅鼐生平與業(yè)績述論[D];西藏民族學院;2013年
4 旦智杰布;淺談藏族傳記文學中的格薩爾與頗羅鼐[D];西北民族大學;2014年
，本文編號：2151147
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgtslw/2151147.html
