本文選題：《契丹國(guó)志》 + 史源疏證��； 參考：《遼寧師范大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 遼朝是由興起于我國(guó)北方的契丹民族建立的草原帝國(guó),在中國(guó)歷史上占有重要地位,而有關(guān)記載遼朝歷史的史書,現(xiàn)今所存數(shù)量稀少,除官修史書《遼史》外,當(dāng)屬成書于宋元之際的《契丹國(guó)志》。這是一部以契丹民族所建政權(quán)為記述主體的史書,具有鮮明的時(shí)代特點(diǎn)和較高的史料價(jià)值。通過(guò)以《契丹國(guó)志·太祖?zhèn)鳌泛汀妒雷趥鳌窞槔龑?duì)此書史料來(lái)源的系統(tǒng)分析可知:其史料來(lái)源最重要者是《資治通鑒》,其次是《新五代史》,同時(shí)還參考了當(dāng)時(shí)所能見(jiàn)到的宋元其它相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)。以往的研究,曾經(jīng)有人對(duì)《國(guó)志》的作者稱賞有加而許為良史,也曾有人指責(zé)其水平偏低,機(jī)械抄書,并不具備史家的基本素質(zhì)。所以出現(xiàn)這種情況,較為合理的解釋是:《國(guó)志》并非出于一人之手,而是水平不一、良莠雜陳的多人合作的結(jié)果。如此說(shuō)不誤,則《契丹國(guó)志》為南宋秘書丞葉隆禮修撰之說(shuō),便顯得十分不可信。在以往的治史觀念中,人們大多都認(rèn)為《通鑒》和《五代史》之于研治遼史,并不屬于直接史料。但在今本《遼史》記事十分簡(jiǎn)略而荒疏的現(xiàn)實(shí)條件下,據(jù)五代史臣所遺史料而成書的《資治通鑒》、《五代史》等中原文獻(xiàn)關(guān)于五代之際(即遼朝早期)北方邊患契丹史事的記載,嚴(yán)格意義上說(shuō)來(lái),也屬于“當(dāng)時(shí)人敘當(dāng)時(shí)事”范圍,其史料價(jià)值,并不比《遼史》遜色多少。這就是前文分析過(guò)程中以常發(fā)現(xiàn)的脫胎于《通鑒》、《舊、新五代史》等書的《國(guó)志》記事,往往與《遼史》吻合,且個(gè)別情況下,還顯得勝于《遼史》的深層原因。
[Abstract]:Liao Dynasty is a grassland empire established by Qidan nationality rising in the north of our country. It occupies an important position in Chinese history. However, there are few historical books about the Liao Dynasty, except the official historical book "Liao History".When the book was written in the Song and Yuan dynasties, Qidan National Chronicles.This is a historical book with the regime built by Qidan nationality as the main body, with distinct characteristics of the times and high historical value.Based on the systematic analysis of the sources of historical materials in this book, such as the Zhuan of the State of Qidan and the Biography of Shizong, we can see that the most important source of historical data is "Zizhi Tong Jian", followed by "History of the New five dynasties", and reference is also made at that time.Other relevant documents in Song and Yuan dynasties.In previous studies, some people have praised the authors of "National Records" for their praise and Xu Weiliang's history. Others have also accused them of being on the low side, copying books mechanically, and not having the basic qualities of historians.Therefore, the more reasonable explanation for this situation is that the "national spirit" is not the result of one person's hand, but the result of multi-person cooperation of different levels, mixed good and bad.If this is correct, it is not credible to write this theory for the secretary of the Southern Song Dynasty, Ye Longli.In the past ideas of governing history, most people think that "General Jian" and "History of five dynasties" are not direct historical materials in the study of Liao's history.However, under the realistic condition that the history of the Liao Dynasty is very simple and sparse, according to the historical materials of the five dynasties, such as "Zizhi Tong Jian" and "the History of the five dynasties" and so on, the history of the northern side of the five dynasties (that is, the early Liao Dynasty) is recorded in the Central Plains documents about the history of the northern side of the five dynasties (that is, the early Liao Dynasty).Strictly speaking, it also belongs to the scope of "people at that time telling things at that time", and its historical value is not inferior to that of Liao Shi.This is the reason why the chronicles of "National Records", which are often found in books such as "General Jian", "Old" and "New History of five dynasties", are consistent with "Liao History", and in some cases, it is better than "Liao History" in some cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K246.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賈敬顏;《晉出帝北遷記》疏證稿[J];北方文物;1986年01期

2 馮永謙;遼代部分州縣今地考[J];北方文物;1994年04期

3 趙永春;;遼金時(shí)期的黃龍府[J];北方文物;2007年01期

4 舒習(xí)龍;;《契丹國(guó)志》的編纂特色與史學(xué)價(jià)值[J];河北學(xué)刊;2009年03期

5 魏奎閣,袁海波;遼外戚蕭阿古只家族世系新補(bǔ)——兼論與阜新的密切關(guān)系[J];遼海文物學(xué)刊;1995年02期

6 馮永謙;遼史地理志考補(bǔ)——上京道、東京道失載之州軍[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線;1998年04期

7 李錫厚;;葉隆禮和《契丹國(guó)志》[J];史學(xué)史研究;1981年04期

8 劉浦江;;關(guān)于《契丹國(guó)志》的若干問(wèn)題[J];史學(xué)史研究;1992年02期

9 都興智,田立坤;后晉石重貴石延煦墓志銘考[J];文物;2004年11期

10 尤李;試析《四庫(kù)全書》對(duì)《契丹國(guó)志》的改編[J];中華文化論壇;2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1754323