發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-16 10:50

  本文選題：明代　切入點(diǎn)：京外五年審錄制度　出處：《歷史檔案》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：明代京外罪囚五年審錄制度源于洪武初年,定制于成化八年(1472年),經(jīng)歷了漫長(zhǎng)的演變過(guò)程。其定制既源于成化以來(lái)日益嚴(yán)重的地方刑獄淹禁現(xiàn)象,又是明代會(huì)官審錄制度深化推廣的結(jié)果。為保證審錄順利進(jìn)行,明朝不僅在時(shí)間、空間上有特殊要求,且本著專選優(yōu)簡(jiǎn)與專職特考原則,在審錄官員簡(jiǎn)選、職權(quán)等方面設(shè)有系統(tǒng)專門規(guī)定。相對(duì)于地方司法體系,其具有諸多優(yōu)勢(shì),但是在司法實(shí)踐中也存在較多弊端,這也最終導(dǎo)致了其在清初的廢除。
[Abstract]:In the Ming Dynasty, the trial and recording system for five years of crimes committed outside Beijing originated from the early years of Hongwu and was customized in the eight years of Chenghua (1472), which experienced a long process of evolution. The customization resulted from the increasingly serious phenomenon of local prison inundation and prohibition since Chenghua. It is also the result of deepening and popularizing the system of official trial and record of the Ming Dynasty. In order to ensure the smooth progress of the trial and record, the Ming Dynasty not only had special requirements in time and space, but also, in line with the principle of special selection of superior brief and full-time special examination, selected briefly the officials in the trial and record. Compared with the local judicial system, it has many advantages, but there are many drawbacks in the judicial practice, which eventually led to its abolition in the early Qing Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 信陽(yáng)師范學(xué)院歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K248
，

本文編號(hào)：1619600