本文選題：《明史紀事本末》　切入點：明蒙古關系　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學》2012年博士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：谷應泰主編《明史紀事本末》成書于順治十五年(1658年)冬,是清人所著明代史中成書較早的一部,比清廷官修《明史》早八十余年。在《明史紀事本末》問世前,《通鑒紀事本末》等紀事本末體史書,在史料價值方面歷來不受好評。這是因為它們僅僅依據(jù)“母本”單一史料編寫,并無新的資料和史實,因此,值得稱道就只有體例上的創(chuàng)新這一點了。與之不同,《明史紀事本末》的史料來源突破了以往紀事本末體史書專據(jù)“母體”一部史書改編、史料來源單一的局限,在史料運用方面博采眾史,用紀事本末體例重新編寫了明史。正因如此,其史料價值被學界重視,甚至在明史研究中經(jīng)常被當作原始資料運用。 《明史紀事本末》全書共80卷,明十六朝重大歷史事件,基本上均于涵括。它雖不是專門記述蒙古史的著作,但對明蒙關系上的重要事件都有專題敘述。這些專題基本按時間順序記敘蒙古特別是明蒙之間所發(fā)生的重大歷史事件,因史料集中、內(nèi)容系統(tǒng)經(jīng)常被研究者利用。 因能力所限,本文不能對《明史紀事本末》全部內(nèi)容進行史料學、文獻學的研究。只好結(jié)合自己的專業(yè)特長,擇取有關蒙古及明蒙關系的14卷專題作為研究對象,對其史料來源、史料價值等進行綜合、系統(tǒng)的研究,試圖“以一斑窺全豹”,發(fā)現(xiàn)其價值,評判其不足。 全文由四個部分組成： 序言部分是本論文的鋪墊,對作者谷應泰以及《明史紀事本末》的編撰、特點、版本、研究狀況進行綜述；對論文選題意義、難點、創(chuàng)新之處作了簡介。 第一章史源篇是對《本末》主要史源的探討。對史源的探究能最直接、最真實地反映這部史籍的史料性質(zhì)和價值。將《本末》與其他史籍相關記載進行比較研究后發(fā)現(xiàn),《明史紀事本末》廣泛征引了《明實錄》等官方資料以及《憲章錄》、《皇明通紀》、《鴻猷錄》等多種具有較高水平和學術價值私人著述,文獻資料分量較重。更為可貴的是,還充分注意到當事人之作和當代史著價值,間能參酌兵部檔案、奏疏等第一手原始記錄�？傮w上因其史料豐富、內(nèi)容廣泛而可補其他史書之缺。 第二章辨析篇是本文難點所在。與其他史書一樣,《明史紀事本末》也存在一些明顯的不足和缺欠,給使用者帶來諸多不便。如,官名、人名、地名錯誤,年代系事錯訛等,都降低了人們對此書的使用率和信任度。對于《明史紀事本末》史料的辨析,可以說是對其史料價值更深層次的探析,可以對他的史料價值作出更客觀的評價。 第三章考證篇是筆者發(fā)揮學科所長的嘗試。從民族史的角度,擇取重要史實與蒙古文文獻史料進行互證,一方面彰顯其史學價值,特別是在明蒙關系史研究中的作用；另一方面印證其不足,特別是涉及蒙古內(nèi)部史實時所存在的局限。 結(jié)語部分是基于自己的研究和心得對《明史紀事本末》的總體評價。
[Abstract]:Gu Yingtai, editor of the History of the Ming Dynasty this end, was written in Shunzhi 15 years (1658) winter, is the Qing Dynasty in the history of the Ming Dynasty is the earliest book, More than 80 years earlier than the Qing Dynasty officials' revision of the History of the Ming Dynasty. Before the publication of the Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty, such historical books as the General Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty and the end of the Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty were written at the end of the Chronicle. The value of historical materials has never been well received. This is because they are written only on the basis of a single historical material of the "mother", and there are no new materials and historical facts, so, Different from this, the sources of historical materials in the Historical Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty have broken through the limitations of the historical books of the late Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty, which were adapted exclusively from a historical book called "Mother body," and from a single source. In the application of historical materials, the author rewrote the history of Ming Dynasty by the method of chronology. Therefore, the value of historical materials was attached great importance to by scholars, and even was often used as the original materials in the study of Ming history. "A Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty" consists of 80 volumes. The major historical events of the Ming Dynasty in 16 were basically covered. Although it is not a book devoted to the history of Mongolia, However, the important events in the relationship between Ming and Mongolia are narrated by special topics. These topics basically chronologically describe the important historical events in Mongolia, especially between Ming and Mongolia. Because of the concentration of historical data, the content system is often used by researchers. Because of the limitation of ability, this paper can't study the whole contents of the Historical Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty, and choose 14 volumes of special topics about the relationship between Mongolia and the Ming Dynasty as the research object. This paper makes a comprehensive and systematic study on the source and value of historical data, and tries to "peep at the whole leopard with one spot", find its value and judge its deficiency. The full text consists of four parts:. The preface is the foreshadowing of this paper, which summarizes the compilation, characteristics, edition and research status of author Gu Yingtai and the book of the Ming History Chronicle, and introduces the significance, difficulty and innovation of the thesis. The first chapter is the exploration of the main sources of history. The exploration of historical sources is the most direct. It is the most true reflection of the nature and value of the historical materials of this historical book. After a comparative study of the historical records of this historical book and other historical records, it is found that the official materials, such as "Ming Shi Lu" and the < Charter > are widely cited in the "Historical Chronicle of the Ming Dynasty", as well as in the relevant records of other historical books. Record >, "Huangming Tongji", "Hongyou record" and many other private works with high level and academic value, What is more valuable is that they also pay full attention to the value of the works of the parties and the contemporary history books, and can refer to the original records of the Ministry of War, such as the archives of the Ministry of War, and so on. On the whole, they are rich in historical data. The contents are extensive and can make up for the shortage of other historical books. The second chapter is the difficulty of this paper. Like other historical books, the Ming History Chronicle also has some obvious shortcomings and shortcomings, which bring many inconvenience to the users. For example, official names, names of people, names of names, names of names, errors of times, etc. It can be said that the analysis of historical materials is a deeper analysis of the value of historical materials, and can make a more objective evaluation of his historical data value. The third chapter is the author's attempt to give full play to the subject's advantages. From the angle of national history, the author chooses the important historical facts and the Mongolian literature historical materials to prove each other, on the one hand, it highlights its historical value, especially its role in the study of the history of the relationship between Ming and Mongolia. On the other hand, it proves its shortcomings, especially when it comes to the internal historical facts of Mongolia. The conclusion part is based on my own research and experience of the Ming History Chronicle.
【學位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：K248;K247

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 王天有;試論穆宗大閱與俺答封貢[J];北京大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年01期

2 屈寧;;試論《明史紀事本末》的編撰特點和文獻價值[J];東岳論叢;2008年01期

3 李烈輝;谷應泰與檔案[J];檔案天地;1996年05期

4 楊杭軍;評永樂帝的五次北征[J];河南師范大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1995年02期

5 錢茂偉;葉建林;;高岱及其《鴻猷錄》初探[J];寧波師院學報(社會科學版);1994年03期

6 寶音德力根;;15世紀中葉前的北元可汗世系及政局[J];蒙古史研究;2000年00期

7 本田實信;寶音夫;;早期北元世系[J];蒙古學資料與情報;1986年02期

8 森川哲雄;王雄;;關于把漢那吉降明事件[J];蒙古學資料與情報;1987年01期

9 薄音湖;關于北元汗系[J];內(nèi)蒙古大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1987年03期

10 王雄;關于“T癜葜?lián)u盵J];內(nèi)蒙古大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1988年02期

相關會議論文 前1條

1 徐泓;;《明史紀事本末·南宮復辟》校讀:兼論其史源、編纂水平及作者問題[A];明史研究論叢（第六輯）[C];2004年

，

本文編號：1594879