本文選題：漢代　切入點：讖緯　出處：《文史哲》2017年04期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】："讖"與"緯"的思想觀念,在兩漢時期有一個由分立而化合的過程。古今學(xué)人往往籠統(tǒng)講說漢代"讖緯",并不符合實際。讖驗觀念始自遠(yuǎn)古,至漢末一直存續(xù),從未間斷。讖至漢初,伴隨著經(jīng)學(xué)興起而發(fā)生了新變——以讖輔經(jīng)、以讖釋經(jīng)。此一現(xiàn)象肇始于文帝時,至漢末一直存在。東漢明、章之后,以白虎觀經(jīng)學(xué)討論會所形成的《白虎通》為標(biāo)志,確立經(jīng)、讖互釋為正統(tǒng)思想。而其遠(yuǎn)源,實在漢初。考察讖、緯之發(fā)生演變史,實際上有讖而無緯。東漢后期出現(xiàn)的所謂"緯",實際就是讖,其實質(zhì)是以讖"緯"經(jīng)。歷來通行的"讖緯始自哀、平之際"的論斷,不僅曲解了張衡,也淆亂了"讖"、"緯"的概念,更與西漢思想發(fā)展實際不符。
[Abstract]:The idea of "prophecy" and "Wei" had a process of combining by separation during the Han Dynasty. The scholars often said in general terms that the "prophecy" of the Han Dynasty was not in line with reality. The idea of prophecy was from ancient times to the end of Han Dynasty. Never stopped. With the rise of Confucian classics, a new change took place along with the rise of Confucian classics. This phenomenon began at the time of Emperor Wen and existed until the end of Han Dynasty. After the Eastern Han Dynasty and Ming Dynasty, Zhang, Taking the "White Tiger Communication" formed by the White Tiger View Classics Seminar as the symbol, establishing the classics and interpreting the prophecy mutually as the orthodox thought. And its far source, in the early Han Dynasty, was to investigate the history of the occurrence and evolution of the prophecies and the latitudes. In fact, there is a prophecy but no weft. The so-called "weft" that appeared in the late Eastern Han Dynasty is actually a prophecy. The essence of the prophecy is not only the misinterpretation of Zhang Heng, but also the conclusion that the prophecy "prophecy", which has always been in use, began to mourn and level. Confusion also confused "prophecy", "weft" concept, but also with the Western Han thought development reality.
【作者單位】： 南開大學(xué)文學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項目“東漢文學(xué)思想史”(14BZW026)的階段性成果
【分類號】：K234
，

本文編號：1561210