本文關(guān)鍵詞： 唐朝 南詔 唐詔關(guān)系 西川節(jié)度使 地位和作用　出處：《西南大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：劍南西川是唐代西南地區(qū)最為重要的藩鎮(zhèn),是唐朝抵御吐蕃、南詔及西南諸蠻的重要力量。劍南西川除了肩負(fù)著西南邊疆防御和西南財(cái)賦來源的使命,在唐朝與南詔的交往和戰(zhàn)爭中,也占據(jù)著重要的作用。劍南西川節(jié)度使作為劍南西川的最高官員,是唐朝對南詔及西南各族政策的直接執(zhí)行者,也是南詔和西南各族與唐朝交往的紐帶,在二者的關(guān)系當(dāng)中起到了十分重要的作用。本文通過對不同時(shí)期的劍南西川節(jié)度使進(jìn)行分析和研究,希望理清在不同的時(shí)期,劍南西川節(jié)度使作為唐朝直接接觸南詔的最高官員,在南詔對唐朝的依附、和盟、戰(zhàn)爭等不同形式的關(guān)系中的地位和作用。本文通過四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。第一部分是劍南西川的基本情況的梳理,從劍南西川節(jié)度的設(shè)置和地理轄區(qū)、劍南西川的兵力、劍南西川節(jié)度使的職權(quán)范圍及其演變幾個(gè)方面對劍南西川和劍南西川節(jié)度使進(jìn)行一個(gè)梳理。指出劍南西川節(jié)度使及其職權(quán),隨著其在唐朝與南詔及吐蕃關(guān)系的變化而發(fā)生著改變,在不同的時(shí)期,劍南西川節(jié)度使在唐詔交往和戰(zhàn)爭中發(fā)揮著不同的作用,而唐朝與南詔、吐蕃力量對比的變化也制約這西川節(jié)度使職權(quán)的發(fā)揮。第二部分是唐詔天寶戰(zhàn)爭和唐詔關(guān)系破裂之下劍南西川節(jié)度使的作為,及西川節(jié)度使的作用在唐詔關(guān)系破裂情況下發(fā)生的轉(zhuǎn)變。唐詔天寶戰(zhàn)爭是唐朝對南詔由扶持結(jié)好,到雙方矛盾激化,最后南詔北臣吐蕃的軍事沖突,而劍南節(jié)度使及劍南官員則作為唐朝對南詔戰(zhàn)爭的主要將領(lǐng)。隨著戰(zhàn)爭而產(chǎn)生的是劍南武將地位的提升和劍南經(jīng)濟(jì)、軍事的破壞,由此而引發(fā)劍南地方的亂局。第三部分是唐詔和盟和唐朝與南詔關(guān)系的恢復(fù)和發(fā)展。南詔臣于吐蕃對唐朝是十分不利的,唐朝重臣由此提出招納南詔以斷吐蕃右臂的策略,劍南西川節(jié)度使則成為唐朝這一策略的直接執(zhí)行者,并最終使南詔重歸唐朝。南詔歸唐對于唐朝有著重要的意義,不僅改變了唐朝在與吐蕃戰(zhàn)爭中的不利地位,更結(jié)好西南諸部,使得唐朝西南邊疆得以鞏固。第四部分是晚唐時(shí)期唐朝、吐蕃和南詔力量對比發(fā)生變化的條件下,西川節(jié)度使職權(quán)和影響力也發(fā)生了改變。晚唐時(shí)期唐朝在自身重重困境之下,國力已經(jīng)大為衰弱,與此同時(shí),南詔卻在這一時(shí)期軍事和經(jīng)濟(jì)都有一定程度的發(fā)展,并向唐朝擴(kuò)張,成為晚唐時(shí)期唐朝在西南地區(qū)重要的邊患。而唐朝國力的衰微使得劍南西川在南詔的入寇行為中往往只能被動防御,在此之下,西川節(jié)度使往往只能擔(dān)負(fù)起邊疆防御的職能。綜上所述,劍南西川節(jié)度使作為唐朝劍南西川的重要官員,在不同的時(shí)期在唐朝與南詔的關(guān)系中發(fā)揮著不同的作用。一方面,劍南西川節(jié)度使是唐朝南詔政策和態(tài)度的直接執(zhí)行者,另一方面,劍南西川節(jié)度使也是南詔及西南諸蠻與唐朝交往的紐帶,唐朝和南詔之間的和盟往來和戰(zhàn)爭都受到其作為的影響。
[Abstract]:Jiannan Xichuan is the most important town in the southwest of Tang Dynasty. It is an important force to resist the Tibetan Nanzhao and the southwest in the Tang Dynasty. In addition to shouldering the southwest frontier defense and the southwest source of wealth Xichuan is the mission of Jiannan Xichuan. In the communication and war between the Tang Dynasty and Nanzhao, they also played an important role. As the highest official of the Xichuan in the south of Jiannan, he was the direct executor of the policies of Nanzhao and all nationalities in the southwest of the Tang Dynasty. It is also the link between Nanzhao and all ethnic groups in Southwest China and the Tang Dynasty, which plays a very important role in the relationship between them. It is hoped that at different times, Xichuan Jiannan, as the highest official in direct contact with Nanzhao in the Tang Dynasty, was attached to the Tang Dynasty in Nanzhao. War and other different forms of relations in the status and role. This paper through four parts to discuss. The first part is the basic situation of Xichuan Jiannan combing from the setting of Jiannan Xichuan section and geographical area. The military strength of Xichuan in south of Jiannan, the terms of reference and its evolution of Xichuan in south of Jiannan and its evolution in several aspects, such as combing Xichuan and Xichuan in Jiannan, and pointing out the rank and authority of Xichuan in Jiannan. With the change of its relations with Nanzhao and Tubo in the Tang Dynasty, in different periods, the Jiannan Xichuan section played a different role in the communication and war of Tang Dynasty, while the Tang Dynasty and Nanzhao played a different role. The change of Tibetan power also restricts the exertion of power in Xichuan. The second part is the action of Xichuan in Jiannan under the Tang Dynasty Tianbao War and the breakdown of Tang Chao relationship. The Tang Dynasty Tianbao War was the military conflict between Nanzhao and Nanzhao in the Tang Dynasty, the conflict between the two sides intensified, and finally Nanzhao Northern Minister Tubo military conflict. As the chief general of the Nanzhao War in the Tang Dynasty, the Jiannan military officials and the Jiannan officials were the main generals in the Tang Dynasty. With the war, the rising status of the Jiannan generals and the destruction of the economy and the military of the South of Jiannan were the main ones. The third part is the restoration and development of the relationship between Tang Zhao and the League and the Tang Dynasty and Nanzhao. Nanzhao officials were very disadvantageous to the Tang Dynasty. The important officials of Tang Dynasty put forward the strategy of inviting Nanzhao to break the right arm of Tubo, and the key of Xichuan in south of Jian became the direct executor of this strategy in Tang Dynasty. Finally, Nanzhao returned to Tang Dynasty. Nanzhao returned to Tang Dynasty, which not only changed the unfavorable position of Tang Dynasty in the war with Tubo, but also formed the southwest. 4th part is the late Tang Dynasty Tang Dynasty, Tubo and Nanzhao changes in the power of the conditions. The power and influence of Xichuan had also changed. In the late Tang Dynasty, the national strength had been greatly weakened under its own difficulties, at the same time. Nanzhao had a certain degree of military and economic development in this period, and expanded to the Tang Dynasty. Tang Dynasty in the late Tang Dynasty in the southwest of the important side of the problem. And the decline of the Tang Dynasty made Xichuan Jiannan in Nanzhao in the act of invading often passive defense, under this. In summary, Xianan Xichuan was an important official in the Tang Dynasty. In different periods in the relationship between the Tang Dynasty and Nanzhao played different roles. On the one hand, Jiannan Xichuan Chuan is the direct executor of the policy and attitude of Nanzhao in the Tang Dynasty, on the other hand. The Jiannan Xichuan Keystone is also the link between Nanzhao and Southwest Juben and Tang Dynasty, and the connection and war between Tang Dynasty and Nanzhao are influenced by their actions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K242

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李何春;;唐代吐蕃和南詔的制鹽技術(shù)比較分析——兼論吐蕃東擴(kuò)之原因[J];云南民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年05期

2 張達(dá)志;;安史亂后唐蕃邊境的進(jìn)退——泛東亞視域的角度[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文科學(xué)版);2015年04期

3 陳樂保;;唐代宗至憲宗時(shí)期的西川節(jié)度使繼任危機(jī)與終結(jié)[J];中國邊疆史地研究;2015年02期

4 肖超宇;;唐代吐蕃東道節(jié)度使研究四題——讀金瀅坤、林冠群等先生文后[J];中央民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2015年S1期

5 劉海霞;;唐朝封授新羅、南詔首領(lǐng)之所見[J];中國邊疆史地研究;2014年03期

6 馬強(qiáng);;從出土墓志看唐代西南地區(qū)漢夷沖突及其消解[J];長江師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

7 袁本海;;未見于史籍的唐代西南地區(qū)兩次民族起事[J];貴州民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2013年04期

8 朱安女;;南詔“德化”治世與儒學(xué)在云南的傳播[J];民族文學(xué)研究;2013年02期

9 金程程;;南詔與唐王朝使者往來的資料整理[J];西南古籍研究;2011年00期

10 趙心愚;;南詔與吐蕃聯(lián)盟關(guān)系的破裂及與唐關(guān)系的恢復(fù)——《異牟尋誓文》的研究[J];云南社會科學(xué);2011年06期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳樂保;唐代劍南道研究[D];山東大學(xué);2015年

2 姜丹;《南詔德化碑》意識形態(tài)研究[D];云南大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 周倫毅;唐宋時(shí)期蜀地政治地理研究[D];西南大學(xué);2015年

2 李秋華;唐與南詔和戰(zhàn)關(guān)系研究[D];福建師范大學(xué);2014年

3 萬春;南詔國對唐朝的政治認(rèn)同及其現(xiàn)代啟示[D];大理學(xué)院;2013年

4 向楠;唐代劍南西川節(jié)度使的政治地理研究[D];北京大學(xué);2012年

5 金程程;南詔和唐使者往來研究[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

6 張熊;唐代西川鎮(zhèn)研究[D];上海師范大學(xué);2012年

7 吳展淵;唐代邊疆問題論爭研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

8 左向陽;地方長吏在唐代西南地區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)開發(fā)中的作用[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

9 金圓恒;南詔的民族政策研究[D];西北民族大學(xué);2007年

10 王敏;唐代開元天寶時(shí)期十道節(jié)度使與中央的關(guān)系研究[D];廈門大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號：1492468