【摘要】：正歷史的真實性亦即客觀性,是歷史著作撰寫的基本原則,對此人們當(dāng)無異議。從理論上來說,歷史的真相只有一種,無論什么樣的歷史學(xué)家只要他們按照歷史的真實性原則進(jìn)行研究和寫作,寫出的歷史真相即作品的內(nèi)容應(yīng)該是基本相同的。然而在歷史研究和撰寫歷史論著的實際過程中,相同的歷史事件和相同的歷史人物,寫出的歷史研究作品卻往往會有不同,乃至截然相反。出現(xiàn)這種現(xiàn)象,也許和研究者違背了研究歷史時所秉持的真實性原則有關(guān),不過也不盡然,因
[Abstract]:The authenticity of positive history, that is, objectivity, is the basic principle of historical works, and people should have no objection to it. In theory, there is only one kind of historical truth. No matter what kind of historian studies and writes according to the principle of historical authenticity, the historical truth that is, the content of the work should be basically the same. However, in the actual process of historical research and writing historical works, the historical research works written by the same historical events and the same historical figures are often different, or even the opposite. The emergence of this phenomenon may have something to do with the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history, but not really, because of the fact that the researchers have violated the principle of authenticity in the study of history.
【作者單位】： 河南大學(xué)近代中國研究所;
【分類號】：K29
，

本文編號：2486451