【摘要】：清初,武當(dāng)山志的編修形成了一個(gè)新的高潮,先后有4部官修山志問(wèn)世。盡管這4部山志在修志實(shí)踐和修志理論上都取得了較大成就,其價(jià)值和地位也僅次于明修山志,但相關(guān)著錄卻頗多疏誤,有的還沿襲至今。本文指出了《四庫(kù)全書總目》、《湖北通志》、《中國(guó)道觀志叢刊》、《三洞拾遺》、《四庫(kù)全書存目叢書》、《中華山水志叢刊》等著錄清修山志的常見疏誤,并據(jù)相關(guān)文獻(xiàn)予以訂補(bǔ)。
[Abstract]:In the early Qing Dynasty, the compilation of Wudang Mountain Records formed a new climax. Although the four mountain records have made great achievements in practice and theory, their value and status are second only to Ming Xiu Shan Zhi, but the related descriptions are rather sparse, some of them have been followed up to now. This paper points out the common mistakes in the description of the mountain records of the Qing Dynasty, such as the General contents of the Siku Quan Shu, the Tongzhi of Hubei Province, the Chinese Taoist Monographs Series, the Collection of the three Daodong Records, the Collection of the catalogue Books of the Chinese Landscape Records, and the Chinese Landscape Records Series, etc. And according to the relevant literature to be revised.
【作者單位】： 貴州師范大學(xué)國(guó)際旅游文化學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金項(xiàng)目“歷代武當(dāng)山志整理與研究”(項(xiàng)目編號(hào):14BZJ033)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：K29
，

本文編號(hào)：2383622