明代中朝官修地理志書中的鴨綠江、圖們江地理認識
發(fā)布時間：2018-11-28 16:58
【摘要】：在明代,中朝兩國均纂修了代表性的官修地理志書。在對于鴨綠江、圖們江地理的記載及認識方面,明朝的官修地理志書因沿襲了傳統(tǒng)地志體例模式,"重中原而弱邊疆"的記史方式,并繼承了"華夷之限"的思想,以及采取了特殊的東北邊疆治理政策,而展現(xiàn)出了較之前代幾近停滯的認識。相比之下,朝鮮王朝的官修地理志書卻因其對中國傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)進行了揚棄,并基于其北方軍事要求與王室需求乃至北疆的快速開拓,以及采取了與內(nèi)地一致的北疆管轄政策,從而展現(xiàn)出了較之前代不斷深化的認識。在導(dǎo)致中朝雙方認識出現(xiàn)差異的這些原因背后,更有明朝傳統(tǒng)"天下"觀的包容型邊疆觀與朝鮮王朝基于疆土實利的務(wù)實型邊疆觀的不同,而這也正是雙方差異如此巨大最深層次的根源。
[Abstract]:In the Ming Dynasty, both China and Korea compiled representative official books on geography. In terms of the records and understanding of the Yalu River and the Tumen River geography, the officials of the Ming Dynasty followed the traditional pattern of geographical chronology, the historical way of "emphasizing the Central Plains rather than the border areas", and inherited the thought of "the limit of Hua Yi". And adopted a special policy of governance of the Northeast Frontier, and showed the understanding of nearly stagnation in previous generations. In contrast, the official of the Korean dynasty, because of its sublation of the traditional Chinese historiography, based on its military requirements of the north and the rapid development of the royal family and even the northern frontier, and adopted a policy of jurisdiction in the north that is consistent with the mainland. Thus showing a deeper understanding than the previous generation. Behind these reasons that led to the difference in understanding between China and North Korea, there is the difference between the tolerant frontier view of the traditional "world" view of the Ming Dynasty and the pragmatic frontier view of the Korean dynasty based on the reality and interests of the territory. And this is also the root of such a huge and deepest level of difference between the two sides.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【基金】：2017年國家社科基金青年項目“朝鮮王朝前期的北方經(jīng)略與中朝界河形成諸問題研究”(項目編號:17CSS009)階段性成果
【分類號】：K29
本文編號：2363605
[Abstract]:In the Ming Dynasty, both China and Korea compiled representative official books on geography. In terms of the records and understanding of the Yalu River and the Tumen River geography, the officials of the Ming Dynasty followed the traditional pattern of geographical chronology, the historical way of "emphasizing the Central Plains rather than the border areas", and inherited the thought of "the limit of Hua Yi". And adopted a special policy of governance of the Northeast Frontier, and showed the understanding of nearly stagnation in previous generations. In contrast, the official of the Korean dynasty, because of its sublation of the traditional Chinese historiography, based on its military requirements of the north and the rapid development of the royal family and even the northern frontier, and adopted a policy of jurisdiction in the north that is consistent with the mainland. Thus showing a deeper understanding than the previous generation. Behind these reasons that led to the difference in understanding between China and North Korea, there is the difference between the tolerant frontier view of the traditional "world" view of the Ming Dynasty and the pragmatic frontier view of the Korean dynasty based on the reality and interests of the territory. And this is also the root of such a huge and deepest level of difference between the two sides.
【作者單位】： 天津師范大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【基金】：2017年國家社科基金青年項目“朝鮮王朝前期的北方經(jīng)略與中朝界河形成諸問題研究”(項目編號:17CSS009)階段性成果
【分類號】：K29
【相似文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 華林甫;;二十世紀正史地理志研究述評[J];中國地方志;2006年02期
2 李綿;《西安市地理志》讀后[J];陜西師大學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);1989年03期
3 任時燮;讀黔東南苗族侗族自治州地理志書簡[J];貴州文史叢刊;1994年01期
4 韓慧;自然地理環(huán)境與自然地理志[J];新疆地方志通訊;1988年01期
5 解樹民;科學(xué)的輿地全書和建設(shè)指南──《黔東南自治州地理志》烏瞰[J];貴州文史叢刊;1994年01期
6 吳傳鈞;評《山西通志·地理志》[J];滄桑;1998年05期
7 王會世;從地理學(xué)與方志學(xué)的關(guān)系看地理志的編纂[J];滄桑;1995年04期
8 程林章;地理志編寫的新視角[J];中國地方志;2004年11期
9 李花子;;明清時期中朝地理志對長白山及水系的記述[J];朝鮮·韓國歷史研究;2009年00期
10 牛潤珍;河北舊方志的源流和發(fā)展[J];河北學(xué)刊;1984年06期
相關(guān)會議論文 前1條
1 李花子;;明清時期中朝地理志對長白山及水系的記述[A];朝鮮·韓國歷史研究(第十輯)——中國朝鮮史研究會會刊[C];2008年
相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條
1 復(fù)旦;國家清史纂修工程《地理志》項目正式啟動[N];中國社會科學(xué)院院報;2004年
，本文編號：2363605
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2363605.html
教材專著
