建省前后西康地方勢力的紛爭研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-08-02 20:30
【摘要】：始于清末川邊改流、成立于1939年的西康省,是近代中國邊疆行政建制的一件大事,前后歷經(jīng)三十余年,幾經(jīng)波折,時廢時興,展現(xiàn)了近代康區(qū)波瀾壯闊、精彩紛呈的一段歷史。本文通過對清末以來幾經(jīng)波折的西康建省之路的歷史回顧,從清末趙爾豐經(jīng)營“川邊地區(qū)”,到北洋政府1913年的“川邊特別行政區(qū)”、1925年的“西康特別行政區(qū)”,再到南京國民政府1934年的“西康建省委員會”、1939年的“西康省”。重點探討以劉文輝為代表的西康地方政府,以格桑澤仁、諾那活佛、劉家駒、任乃強等康巴精英、學(xué)者,以及土司、寺廟等西康地方勢力在西康建省中的發(fā)展與演變,圍繞西康建省中因建省方案、建省領(lǐng)導(dǎo)權(quán)、黨部建設(shè)、疆界劃分、人事組織等產(chǎn)生了錯綜復(fù)雜的矛盾與沖突,展開的權(quán)力紛爭與角逐,從而相繼爆發(fā)了“綽斯甲歸屬之爭”、“大白事件”、“格桑澤仁事件”、“諾那事件”、“甘孜事件”。以劉文輝為首的地方政權(quán)與中央政權(quán)的權(quán)力紛爭,反映了國家權(quán)力擴張與地方割據(jù)之間的矛盾;以格桑澤仁為首的康巴精英、西康土司以及藏傳佛教勢力與劉文輝的權(quán)力斗爭則反映了地方自治運動與軍閥割據(jù)獨統(tǒng)之間的矛盾,“康人治康”的實質(zhì),就是要將劉文輝的客居勢力趕出康區(qū),由康人自行組建行省。西康建省就是各種矛盾與權(quán)力糾葛上的暫時妥協(xié),這種暫時妥協(xié)卻使西康完成省制建制。西康建省后,西康地方勢力進行了洗牌與組局,劉文輝集黨政軍大權(quán)于一身,且與西康宗教、土司勢力達(dá)成了政治默契,實現(xiàn)了互惠互利共贏的局面;中央政府在西康省設(shè)委員長西昌行營,并派兵進駐,省黨部、中統(tǒng)、軍統(tǒng)組織在西康建立健全;康巴精英雖在三次“康人治康運動”中損失慘重,但仍掌握了部分輿論話語權(quán);寧屬彝族家支勢力、雅屬袍哥堂會勢力登上西康政治舞臺,相繼在“普雄事件”、“雅屬事件”中,加入了與劉文輝、中央政府的新一輪博弈�？傊�,西康地方勢力形成此消彼長、多元紛呈的局面,在一系列的錯綜復(fù)雜斗爭中不斷整合,在主觀與客觀因素作用下加快西康省的建設(shè)步伐。
[Abstract]:Xikang province, which was founded in 1939 and started in late Qing Dynasty, is a major event in the administrative system of modern China's frontier areas. After more than 30 years, it has experienced several twists and turns, and then abandoned the trend of the times, showing the magnificent and splendid history of modern Kang District. By reviewing the history of the road to the establishment of Xikang Province, which has undergone twists and turns since the end of the Qing Dynasty, this paper goes from Zhao Erfeng's management of the "Sichuan Border region" in the late Qing Dynasty to the "Sichuan Border Special Administrative region" of the Beiyang Government in 1913 and the "Xikang Special Administrative region" in 1925. Then to Nanjing National Government in 1934, "Xikang Provincial Committee", 1939 "Xikang Province." It focuses on the development and evolution of the Xikang local government, represented by Liu Wenhui, the elite of Kangba, scholars, Tusi, temples and other local forces in Xikang Province, such as Gesang Zeren, Nona living Buddha, Liu Jiazu, Ren Naiqiang, and so on. Around the program of establishing the province, the leadership of the province, the construction of the Party department, the demarcation of the boundary, the personnel organization and so on, there have been intricate contradictions and conflicts, disputes and competitions of power that have been launched, and thus the "dispute over the ownership of Chuosijia" has broken out one after another. The Great White incident, the Gesanzelen incident, the Nona incident, the Ganzi incident. The power disputes between the local and central governments led by Liu Wenhui reflected the contradiction between the expansion of state power and the local separation regime. The power struggle between Xikang Tusi and Tibetan Buddhist forces and Liu Wenhui reflected the contradiction between the local autonomy movement and the separation of warlords from the monarchy. The essence of "healthy people governing health" is to drive Liu Wenhui's guest forces out of the Kang district. Kang people form their own provinces. Xikang Province is a temporary compromise of various contradictions and power disputes, which makes Xikang complete the provincial system. After the establishment of Xikang Province, Xikang local forces shuffled the cards and organized the bureau. Liu Wenhui gathered the party, government and army power in one, and reached a political tacit understanding with Xikang religion and the Tusi forces, and realized the situation of mutual benefit and win-win situation. The central government has set up Xichang camp in Xikang province and sent troops to the camp. The provincial Party Department, the Central Unification, and the military Unification Organization have established and improved in Xikang. Although the Kangba elite has suffered heavy losses in the three "healthy people governing the healthy Movement," they still have some right to speak in public opinion. Ning is a branch of the Yi nationality, and the Ya Pao Gog Church ascends the political stage of Xikang, and successively adds a new round of games with Liu Wenhui and the Central Government in the "Puxiong incident" and "Ya Family incident". In a word, the local forces in Xikang have formed one and the other, and diversified situation, in a series of complex struggle constantly integrated, under the subjective and objective factors to speed up the construction of Xikang province.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K29
本文編號：2160638
[Abstract]:Xikang province, which was founded in 1939 and started in late Qing Dynasty, is a major event in the administrative system of modern China's frontier areas. After more than 30 years, it has experienced several twists and turns, and then abandoned the trend of the times, showing the magnificent and splendid history of modern Kang District. By reviewing the history of the road to the establishment of Xikang Province, which has undergone twists and turns since the end of the Qing Dynasty, this paper goes from Zhao Erfeng's management of the "Sichuan Border region" in the late Qing Dynasty to the "Sichuan Border Special Administrative region" of the Beiyang Government in 1913 and the "Xikang Special Administrative region" in 1925. Then to Nanjing National Government in 1934, "Xikang Provincial Committee", 1939 "Xikang Province." It focuses on the development and evolution of the Xikang local government, represented by Liu Wenhui, the elite of Kangba, scholars, Tusi, temples and other local forces in Xikang Province, such as Gesang Zeren, Nona living Buddha, Liu Jiazu, Ren Naiqiang, and so on. Around the program of establishing the province, the leadership of the province, the construction of the Party department, the demarcation of the boundary, the personnel organization and so on, there have been intricate contradictions and conflicts, disputes and competitions of power that have been launched, and thus the "dispute over the ownership of Chuosijia" has broken out one after another. The Great White incident, the Gesanzelen incident, the Nona incident, the Ganzi incident. The power disputes between the local and central governments led by Liu Wenhui reflected the contradiction between the expansion of state power and the local separation regime. The power struggle between Xikang Tusi and Tibetan Buddhist forces and Liu Wenhui reflected the contradiction between the local autonomy movement and the separation of warlords from the monarchy. The essence of "healthy people governing health" is to drive Liu Wenhui's guest forces out of the Kang district. Kang people form their own provinces. Xikang Province is a temporary compromise of various contradictions and power disputes, which makes Xikang complete the provincial system. After the establishment of Xikang Province, Xikang local forces shuffled the cards and organized the bureau. Liu Wenhui gathered the party, government and army power in one, and reached a political tacit understanding with Xikang religion and the Tusi forces, and realized the situation of mutual benefit and win-win situation. The central government has set up Xichang camp in Xikang province and sent troops to the camp. The provincial Party Department, the Central Unification, and the military Unification Organization have established and improved in Xikang. Although the Kangba elite has suffered heavy losses in the three "healthy people governing the healthy Movement," they still have some right to speak in public opinion. Ning is a branch of the Yi nationality, and the Ya Pao Gog Church ascends the political stage of Xikang, and successively adds a new round of games with Liu Wenhui and the Central Government in the "Puxiong incident" and "Ya Family incident". In a word, the local forces in Xikang have formed one and the other, and diversified situation, in a series of complex struggle constantly integrated, under the subjective and objective factors to speed up the construction of Xikang province.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：K29
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 李殿元;論劉文輝反蔣[J];社會科學(xué)研究;1994年01期
2 李殿元;略論劉文輝研究中的幾個問題[J];天府新論;1994年03期
3 杜永彬;;論德格土司的特點[J];西藏研究;1991年03期
4 曾國慶;芻議清代藏區(qū)土司制度[J];西藏研究;1997年02期
5 張杰;民國川省土匪、袍哥與軍閥的關(guān)系[J];江蘇社會科學(xué);1991年03期
6 黃天華;論民國時期西康建省[J];四川師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2001年04期
7 胡曉梅;劉文輝康區(qū)烏拉制度改革述論[J];四川教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年09期
8 馬宣偉;劉文輝與西康建省[J];文史雜志;2002年05期
9 羅同兵;諾那活佛的幾個重要史實略考[J];宗教學(xué)研究;2004年02期
10 王燕;淺析第三次康藏糾紛[J];民國檔案;2003年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 孫明明;近代康區(qū)政治權(quán)力體系演變研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年
2 段金生;南京國民政府的邊政[D];云南大學(xué);2010年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 朱曉舟;第三次康藏糾紛研究（1930-1940）[D];四川師范大學(xué);2015年
2 關(guān)f ;一個彝族土司的國家認(rèn)同與民族認(rèn)同[D];中央民族大學(xué);2015年
3 趙聆鈞;雅屬事件與地方權(quán)勢[D];西南民族大學(xué);2015年
4 史培寅;西康省制進程中的權(quán)力角逐與政治秩序建構(gòu)[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年
5 奐靈君;四川袍哥研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2012年
6 王永斌;論西康建省及其歷史作用[D];西藏民族學(xué)院;2012年
7 廖華西;劉文輝治理西康的實踐及其思想評述[D];四川師范大學(xué);2011年
8 陶昕;民主改革與四川德格土司轄區(qū)宗教變遷研究[D];西南大學(xué);2011年
9 王方;1940年代川西袍哥團體研究[D];四川師范大學(xué);2008年
10 辛宇玲;西康建省研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2006年
，本文編號：2160638
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/zgmzsz/2160638.html
教材專著
