本文選題：民族政策 + 呼韓邪降漢��； 參考：《中央民族大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版)》2010年06期

【摘要】：《秦、西漢的"內(nèi)臣"與"外臣》一文所歸納的漢代"外臣"的"基本特點(diǎn)"及其匈奴呼韓邪單于"當(dāng)然也不是漢王朝分封的諸侯或諸侯王"的論斷,與歷史事實(shí)存在著較大的差異,對于當(dāng)時的匈奴呼韓邪政權(quán)不能適用。當(dāng)時,西漢皇帝是君,匈奴呼韓邪單于是臣,西漢中央王朝與匈奴呼韓邪政權(quán)之間的關(guān)系是西漢中央政府與匈奴地方政權(quán)性質(zhì)的關(guān)系。本文從政治、軍事、經(jīng)濟(jì)以及所謂的"外交"方面,分析論證了降漢以后的匈奴呼韓邪單于已經(jīng)不是西漢的"外臣",而是西漢中央王朝的臣。
[Abstract]:"the basic characteristics" of the "foreign ministers" in the Han Dynasty and the conclusion that the Xiongnu calls for Han evil "are not, of course, the princes or princes of the Han Dynasty", as summarized in the "Inner Ministers" and "the Foreign Ministers" of the Western Han Dynasty, in the Qin Dynasty and the Western Han Dynasty. There is a great difference from historical facts, which can not be applied to the Xiongnu's exuberant regime at that time. At that time, the emperor of the Western Han Dynasty was the emperor, and the Xiongnu called Han evil was the minister. The relationship between the Central Dynasty of the Western Han Dynasty and the Xiongnu Hu-Han evil regime was the relationship between the Central Government of the Western Han Dynasty and the local regime of the Xiongnu. From the aspects of politics, military affairs, economy and so-called "diplomacy", this paper analyzes and demonstrates that the Xiongnu exiled from Han Dynasty is no longer a "foreign minister" of the Western Han Dynasty, but a minister of the Central Dynasty of the Western Han Dynasty.
【作者單位】： 內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)人文學(xué)院;
【分類號】：K289

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 劉瑞;秦、西漢的“內(nèi)臣”與“外臣”[J];民族研究;2003年03期

【二級參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 劉瑞;秦“屬邦”、“臣邦”與“典屬國”[J];民族研究;1999年04期

2 王子今 ,劉華祝;說張家山漢簡《二年律令·津關(guān)令》所見五關(guān)[J];中國歷史文物;2003年01期

，

本文編號：2079429