本文選題：知識斷裂 + “種人”��； 參考：《云南社會科學》2017年06期

【摘要】：元以來云南方志中所記之"種人"名稱及分類,至清末以多種形式進入當時新學中的"人種"或"民族"知識系統(tǒng),且存在較大差異。這一點反映在同樣是在近代種族、民族觀念指導下晚清的兩種滇西民族分類中,《騰越鄉(xiāng)土志》汲取清代道光以來的"種人"分類,而楊發(fā)銳《騰越人種考》則是吸收明代至清代早期的一套"種人"分類系統(tǒng)。在理念和話語上,楊發(fā)銳要比寸開泰等人"新",但其所據(jù)以為本的傳統(tǒng)知識,產(chǎn)生時間卻要早于后者。觀念之"新"與知識之"舊"之間的反差,可說明中國近代傳統(tǒng)與現(xiàn)代知識體系之間的斷裂,也就是歷史記憶的延續(xù)與知識體系的斷裂,反映出中國這樣一個具有深厚多民族歷史傳統(tǒng)的國家向現(xiàn)代民族國家轉(zhuǎn)型的復雜性。
[Abstract]:Since the Yuan Dynasty, the names and classifications of "species" recorded in Fang Zhi of Yunnan Province have entered into the "ethnic" or "national" knowledge systems in various forms in the late Qing Dynasty, and there are great differences between them. This is also reflected in the two kinds of ethnic classification in the late Qing Dynasty under the guidance of modern race and national concept. "Teng Yue Local Records" derives from the classification of "species" since the Qing Dynasty Dao Guang. Yang Fa-rui 's "Teng Yue" is a classification system of "species" from Ming Dynasty to the early Qing Dynasty. In concept and discourse, Yang Fa-rui is "new" than Cun Kaitai and others, but the traditional knowledge based on it is produced earlier than the latter. The contrast between the concept of "new" and the "old" of knowledge can explain the rupture between traditional and modern knowledge system in modern China, that is, the continuity of historical memory and the rupture of knowledge system. It reflects the complexity of China's transition from a country with profound historical tradition of many nationalities to a modern nation-state.
【作者單位】： 中國社會科學院民族學與人類學研究所《民族研究》編輯部;
【分類號】：K29

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 楊培德;中華現(xiàn)代民族國家認同與蚩尤文化研究[N];中國民族報;2012年

，

本文編號：2026589