本文選題：朝鮮族　切入點(diǎn)：認(rèn)同　出處：《中央民族大學(xué)》2007年博士論文

【摘要】： 一直以來，認(rèn)同問題都是我國民族學(xué)、人類學(xué)界的熱門話題。隨著西方族群概念及其相關(guān)理論的傳入并逐漸得到學(xué)界的認(rèn)可接納之后，族群認(rèn)同和族群意識的相關(guān)研究得到了更廣泛的青睞。而我國的朝鮮族由于特殊的歷史經(jīng)歷和現(xiàn)實(shí)沖擊，認(rèn)同意識處于鮮明的發(fā)展變化中，特點(diǎn)突出，因此本文將朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識研究與民族學(xué)的族群理論研究相結(jié)合意義突出，主要體現(xiàn)在豐富和發(fā)展族群研究理論、推動(dòng)跨境民族認(rèn)同意識研究以及厘清朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識、從而對朝鮮族和其他少數(shù)民族相關(guān)研究的借鑒意義等。 本論文采用的研究方法主要是文獻(xiàn)資料分析與調(diào)查訪談相結(jié)合的方法。文獻(xiàn)資料包括與本文研究對象朝鮮族直接相關(guān)的文獻(xiàn)資料以及國內(nèi)民族學(xué)、人類學(xué)研究中關(guān)于“民族”、“族群”、“認(rèn)同意識”等方面的理論成果。個(gè)案的深度調(diào)查訪談是筆者獲取第一資料的主要研究方法，是本文行文論證的基礎(chǔ)。 本文主要分三個(gè)部分，緒論、正文和結(jié)論。 緒論部分主要介紹了本文的選題意義，國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究動(dòng)態(tài)、本研究的主要方法并對文中重要概念、術(shù)語的含義進(jìn)行了闡釋。 正文部分是文章的論述中心，共包括六章三部分內(nèi)容： 第一章即為正文的第一部分內(nèi)容，是對朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識研究中相關(guān)概念的厘定，為后文的論述奠定了概念和理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章和第三章是正文的第二部分內(nèi)容，是關(guān)于朝鮮族從遷入中國、形成中國一少數(shù)民族以來，直到1980年代中國改革開放之前這段時(shí)期認(rèn)同意識的分析研究。第二章回顧了朝鮮族先民的遷入歷史、不同歷史時(shí)期各統(tǒng)治階級對朝鮮移民的政策以及朝鮮族身份最終確立的過程，構(gòu)成了研究和理解朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的重要背景知識和歷史根源；第三章總結(jié)了從移民而來到改革開放之前影響朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識形成的主要因素，并在此基礎(chǔ)上分析了這一時(shí)期朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的特點(diǎn)。 第四章到第六章是正文的第三部分。結(jié)合筆者的調(diào)查訪談，這部分內(nèi)容重點(diǎn)分析闡述了改革開放以后朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的發(fā)展變化。改革開放以后影響朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識發(fā)展變化的因素主要有國內(nèi)國外兩方面，一是改革開放帶來的國內(nèi)朝鮮族社會發(fā)生的巨大變遷，二是中韓建交以后朝鮮族通過勞務(wù)輸出，大規(guī)模走進(jìn)韓國，從而形成的對韓國真實(shí)的經(jīng)歷經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第四章和第五章就分別具體闡述這兩方面因素對朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識發(fā)展變化所形成的影響；在詳細(xì)分析了改革開放后影響朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識發(fā)展變化各種具體、直接的因素之后，第六章總結(jié)分析了目前朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的新變化和新特點(diǎn)，并運(yùn)用一定的族群認(rèn)同和跨界民族認(rèn)同理論對朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識進(jìn)行理論分析。 論文最后是結(jié)論部分，主要是對內(nèi)容結(jié)構(gòu)和主要內(nèi)容的概述，并提出筆者的主要觀點(diǎn)： 二、本文主要觀點(diǎn) 首先是對相關(guān)術(shù)語適用的意見。對“民族”、“族群”的適用范圍和英文對譯問題，筆者觀點(diǎn)如下：(1)在“中華民族”這一層面上使用“民族”，英文對譯為“Chinese Nation”，以強(qiáng)調(diào)國家政治內(nèi)涵。(2)在“少數(shù)民族”、“中國的56個(gè)民族”這一層次上，筆者不贊成將其改成“少數(shù)族群”、“56個(gè)族群”，認(rèn)為從總稱角度使用“民族”含義時(shí)仍然使用“民族”而不用“族群”是合宜的。這一層次含義上的“民族”對外翻譯仍然用nationality。(3)在具體各少數(shù)民族的稱呼上，為了避免產(chǎn)生歧義，筆者認(rèn)為在我國具體的民族名稱上，應(yīng)該放棄“族”是“民族”簡稱簡寫的觀念，明確地把“某某族”作為我國56個(gè)民族唯一的名稱，，而不再使用“某某民族”這樣的稱謂來指稱國內(nèi)各民族。 由此，筆者認(rèn)為在朝鮮族相關(guān)研究中，對“朝鮮族”和“朝鮮民族”概念的含義和使用也必須規(guī)范化�！俺r民族”這個(gè)指稱應(yīng)該是一個(gè)泛指，包括朝鮮半島朝鮮人、中國朝鮮族和居住在世界其它國家地區(qū)的所有擁有朝鮮血統(tǒng)的人群整體。而“朝鮮族”是一個(gè)含義明確的中國一少數(shù)民族的專有名詞，表示的就是擁有中國國籍的那部分朝鮮人群。 第二是朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的“三重說”。本文認(rèn)為朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識具有“三重性”：對中國的國家認(rèn)同；對作為中國少數(shù)民族之一身份的認(rèn)同和對朝鮮半島上朝鮮民族的認(rèn)同，可以分別表述為國家認(rèn)同、族群認(rèn)同和跨境民族認(rèn)同�！皟芍卣f”不足以全面概括朝鮮族認(rèn)同意識的特點(diǎn)。 第三，本文認(rèn)為朝鮮族三個(gè)認(rèn)同層次基本上已經(jīng)形成清晰并協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一。在國家認(rèn)同上朝鮮族明確地將中國作為他們的祖國，增強(qiáng)了作為中國公民的自豪感和自信心；在跨境民族認(rèn)同上他們將朝韓兩國作為自己的故國，認(rèn)同的基礎(chǔ)是共同的血緣和傳統(tǒng)文化；對作為中國少數(shù)民族之一的族群認(rèn)同意識雖然面臨危機(jī)，但仍然非常強(qiáng)烈。三個(gè)認(rèn)同層次形成了協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:Since the identity problem is China's hot topic of ethnology, anthropology circles. With the introduction of western ethnic concept and its related theories and gradually recognized academic acceptance, related research of ethnic identity and ethnic consciousness has been more widely favored. In China, the Korean because of the special historical experience and reality the impact of identity in the development and change of distinctive, prominent characteristics, so this paper will research on Korean ethnic identity theory research and the combination of ethnology, mainly reflected in the theoretical research to enrich and develop ethnic groups, to promote awareness of national identity and clarify the cross-border Korean identity, to Korean and other minority the national research significance.
The main research methods of the paper is the method of literature analysis and interviews with a combination of survey. Documents including the research object of this paper is directly related to the Korean literature and domestic ethnology, anthropology research on "nation", "ethnic group", "identity" and other theoretical results. The case depth interview is the main research method the author gets the first data, is the basis for the argument.
This article is mainly divided into three parts, the introduction, the text and the conclusion.
The introduction mainly introduces the significance of this topic, the related research trends both at home and abroad, the main methods of this study, and explains the important concepts and terms in the text.
The main body of the text is the center of the article, which includes six chapters and three parts.
The first chapter is the first part of the text, which is the definition of the related concepts in the Korean identity consciousness research. It lays a conceptual and theoretical foundation for the later discussion.
The second chapter and the third chapter is the second part of the body, is a Korean immigration from Chinese, since the formation of a minority of Chinese, until 1980s this period of reform and opening up China identity. The second chapter reviews the history of immigration of Korean ancestors, the ruling class of the policies on the Korean immigrants in different history during the Korean and the establishment of the identity, form the research and understanding of Korean identity important background and historical origin; the third chapter summarizes from the immigration came before the reform and opening up effect of Korean identity formation of the main factors, and based on the analysis of the characteristics of Korean identity consciousness in this period.
The fourth chapter to the sixth chapter is the third part of the text. Based on the investigation, this part analysis focuses on the reform and opening up the development and change of Korean identity. After the reform and opening up after the influence factors of the Korean identity development mainly has two aspects at home and abroad, is a result of reform and opening up the domestic Korean society the two is a huge change, China and South Korea established diplomatic relations after the Korean labor export through large-scale, into South Korea, thus forming the real experience of South Korea. The fourth chapter and the fifth chapter respectively expounds the two factors of the formation of Korean identity development; in the detailed analysis of the influence of North Korea after the reform and opening up the change and development of a variety of specific national identity consciousness, after the direct factor, the sixth chapter analyzes the current Korean identity of the new changes and new features It also makes a theoretical analysis of the Korean identity consciousness with the theory of ethnic identity and the theory of cross boundary national identity.
The final part of the paper is the conclusion of the paper, which is mainly a summary of the content structure and main content, and puts forward the main views of the author:
Two, the main points of this article
The first is to apply the views of relevant terms. "Nation", "translation of the scope of the ethnic group" and English, the author points are as follows: (1) in the "Chinese nation" on the aspect of the use of "nation", English translated as "Chinese Nation", to emphasize the connotation of national politics (2.) in the "minority", "the 56 national level" China on I do not support to "minority", "56 groups", that the use of "nation" meaning from the general angle still use the "nation" and "ethnic group" is not appropriate. This level the meaning of "national" translation still by nationality. (3) in the ethnic name, in order to avoid ambiguity, the author thinks that in the specific name of the Chinese nation, should abandon the "family" is referred to as the "nation" - concept, clearly put "a certain family "As the only name of the 56 ethnic groups in our country, and no longer use the title of" one and one nation "to refer to the national ethnic groups.
Thus, the author thinks that the related research in Korean, meaning and use of "Korean" and "Korean nation" concept must also be standardized. "The Korean nation" that it should be a general, including the Korean Peninsula and North Korea, North Korea has all Korean ancestry Chinese and living in the world it is the region. And the "Korean" is a clear meaning of the China minority of proper nouns, said that part of the Korean people that have Chinese nationality.
The second is Korean identity "three repeat. This paper argues that Korean identity has" three ": Chinese national identity; on the China as one of the ethnic minorities and the identity of the Korean Peninsula on the Korean national identity, could be expressed as national identity, ethnic identity and ethnic identity of cross-border." double "to generalize characteristics of Korean identity.
Third, the Korean three identity level basically has formed a clear and unified coordination. In the national identity of Korean will be clearly China as their motherland, enhanced as China civic pride and self-confidence; in the cross-border ethnic identity they will both Koreas as their own country, the foundation of identity is common the blood and traditional culture; as one of the Chinese minority ethnic identity while facing a crisis, but is still very strong. Three levels form a unified identity.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K281.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 李梅花;;中國朝鮮族國家認(rèn)同研究綜述[J];大連民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

2 王紀(jì)芒;;全球化時(shí)代中國朝鮮族的民族認(rèn)同與國家認(rèn)同——以中國某邊疆的朝鮮族為例[J];湖北民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2008年04期

3 王紀(jì)芒;;中國朝鮮族的民族認(rèn)同與國家認(rèn)同——以中國某邊疆地區(qū)的朝鮮族為例[J];黑龍江民族叢刊;2008年04期

4 于春江;吳磊;;“認(rèn)同危機(jī)”與“發(fā)展困境”——當(dāng)代中國朝鮮族社會變遷問題管窺[J];四川民族學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年06期

5 姜瑩瑩;;延邊朝鮮族的發(fā)展問題及對策[J];民族論壇;2012年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條

1 劉智文;東疆民族關(guān)系史研究[D];東北師范大學(xué);2008年

2 樸婷姬;中國朝鮮族與在日朝鮮人社會比較研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2008年

3 周文;佤族心理認(rèn)同的代際差異研究[D];云南大學(xué);2012年

4 劉玉梅;在京朝鮮族父母育兒方式研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2012年

5 馬英美;改革開放后中國朝鮮語新詞研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2012年

6 李町燦;關(guān)于黑龍江省西北部朝鮮族農(nóng)村歷史的民族學(xué)考察[D];中央民族大學(xué);2013年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 梁俊穎;大連地區(qū)朝鮮族與韓國遷移者的民族認(rèn)同比較[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2010年

2 汪源;遼寧下露河鄉(xiāng)朝鮮族身份認(rèn)同的調(diào)查與探索[D];陜西師范大學(xué);2011年

3 梁柳寶;羅城縣仫佬族高中生民族認(rèn)同調(diào)查研究[D];廣西民族大學(xué);2011年

4 李叢叢;中國朝鮮族小說中的韓國人形象研究[D];山東大學(xué);2011年

5 康鴻鵬;當(dāng)代朝鮮族大學(xué)生認(rèn)同意識研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2011年

6 張賀;延吉市朝鮮族初中生民族認(rèn)同研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2008年

7 崔美蘭;吉林省朝鮮族新農(nóng)村建設(shè)問題研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2008年

8 張同太;漂泊與根植[D];中央民族大學(xué);2008年

9 金慧玲;中國朝鮮族人生禮儀的道德教育功能研究[D];西南大學(xué);2009年

10 朱金春;地緣安全視野下的跨界民族認(rèn)同意識研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2009年

本文編號：1710357