【摘要】：自Dehaene等人(1993)發(fā)現(xiàn)了空間-數(shù)字反應(yīng)聯(lián)合編碼(Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes, SNARC效應(yīng))效應(yīng)后,空間-數(shù)字聯(lián)合表征受到廣泛關(guān)注。Lochster等人(2008)首次發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)頭部向右轉(zhuǎn)時(shí),被試傾向于報(bào)告更多的大數(shù)字,而頭部向左轉(zhuǎn)時(shí),被試傾向于報(bào)告更多的小數(shù)字。具身認(rèn)知(embodied cognition)的觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為身體在認(rèn)知過程中發(fā)揮著重要的作用,身體運(yùn)動(dòng)經(jīng)驗(yàn)與內(nèi)在的、抽象的心理過程和認(rèn)知過程緊密關(guān)聯(lián),頭部的轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)致使注意向轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)方向轉(zhuǎn)移,從而激活對(duì)應(yīng)的空間-數(shù)字表征。頭部是進(jìn)行思維認(rèn)知的關(guān)鍵部分,頭部的運(yùn)動(dòng)影響高級(jí)的數(shù)字認(rèn)知加工,那么身體其他部位的運(yùn)動(dòng)是否也有同樣的作用?本研究旨在探討手的運(yùn)動(dòng)對(duì)數(shù)字認(rèn)知加工的影響,同時(shí)探討手和頭的同時(shí)運(yùn)動(dòng)對(duì)SNARC效應(yīng)產(chǎn)生的影響。 本研究采用隨機(jī)報(bào)告法的范式,比較被試在向左和向右運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí)報(bào)告的小數(shù)字的個(gè)數(shù)。實(shí)驗(yàn)1中,被試做抬左手或抬右手的運(yùn)動(dòng),發(fā)現(xiàn)相對(duì)于不運(yùn)動(dòng)的狀態(tài),抬左手時(shí)被試傾向于報(bào)告小數(shù)字,抬右手時(shí)被試傾向于報(bào)告大數(shù)字,即呈現(xiàn)出SNARC效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)2中,被試同時(shí)做抬手和轉(zhuǎn)頭運(yùn)動(dòng),沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)SNARC效應(yīng)。實(shí)驗(yàn)3中,被試分別完成頭部左右連續(xù)轉(zhuǎn)動(dòng)和雙手左右循環(huán)運(yùn)動(dòng),發(fā)現(xiàn)手部運(yùn)動(dòng)和頭部運(yùn)動(dòng),都發(fā)現(xiàn)了SNARC效應(yīng),即相對(duì)于向右運(yùn)動(dòng),向左運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí),被試報(bào)告更多的小數(shù)字。實(shí)驗(yàn)4中,被試同時(shí)運(yùn)動(dòng)頭部和手部。結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)手部和頭部運(yùn)動(dòng)方向一致時(shí),呈現(xiàn)出SNARC效應(yīng),而當(dāng)手部和頭部運(yùn)動(dòng)方向不一致時(shí),SNARC效應(yīng)消失。本研究得到的主要結(jié)論：1、手部運(yùn)動(dòng)和頭部運(yùn)動(dòng)對(duì)空間-數(shù)字聯(lián)合表征中有著相似的作用。2、當(dāng)頭和手同時(shí)運(yùn)動(dòng)時(shí),方向一致時(shí)存在SNARC效應(yīng),而方向不一致時(shí)SNARC效應(yīng)消失。本研究進(jìn)一步表明具身認(rèn)知對(duì)空間-數(shù)字聯(lián)合表征產(chǎn)生影響。
[Abstract]:Since Dehaene et al. (1993) discovered the space-digital response co-coding (Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes, SNARC effect, the space-digital joint representation has attracted widespread attention. Lochster et al. (2008) for the first time found that when the head turns to the right, Subjects tended to report more large numbers, while those who turned left tended to report more small numbers. According to (embodied cognition), the body plays an important role in the cognitive process. The physical movement experience is closely related to the internal, abstract psychological process and the cognitive process, and the rotation of the head leads to the shift of attention to the direction of rotation. Thus the corresponding spatial-digital representation is activated. The head is a key part of thinking cognition. The movement of the head affects advanced digital cognitive processing, so does the movement of other parts of the body have the same effect? The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hand movement on digital cognitive processing and the effect of hand and head simultaneous movement on SNARC effect. In this study, a random reporting paradigm was used to compare the number of small numbers reported when subjects were moving left and right. In experiment 1, the subjects did the movement of raising the left hand or the right hand. It was found that the subjects who raised the left hand tended to report small numbers, and those who raised the right hand tended to report large numbers, that is, there was a SNARC effect. In experiment 2, the SNARC effect was not found. In experiment 3, the subjects completed the continuous rotation of the head and the left and right circulation of the hands, and found that both the hand movement and the head movement found the SNARC effect, that is, when the subjects moved to the left and the right, they reported more small numbers. In experiment 4, both head and hand movements were performed. The results showed that the SNARC effect was observed when the movement direction of the hand and the head was the same, but the SNARC effect disappeared when the movement direction of the hand and the head was not the same. The main conclusions of this study are: 1: 1, the movement of hand and head have similar effects on the space-digital joint representation. When the head and hand move simultaneously, the SNARC effect exists when the direction is consistent, but the SNARC effect disappears when the direction is inconsistent. The present study further shows that physical cognition has an effect on spatial-digital joint representation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：B842.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 潘運(yùn);沈德立;王杰;;不同注意提示線索條件下漢字?jǐn)?shù)字加工的SNARC效應(yīng)[J];心理與行為研究;2009年01期

2 潘運(yùn);全小山;林偉民;尚隨峰;;外源性注意不同線索提示比例對(duì)漢字?jǐn)?shù)字SNARC效應(yīng)的影響[J];貴州師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2011年01期

3 劉 超,買曉琴,傅小蘭;不同注意條件下的空間-數(shù)字反應(yīng)編碼聯(lián)合效應(yīng)[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

4 李其維;;“認(rèn)知革命”與“第二代認(rèn)知科學(xué)”芻議[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2008年12期

5 葉浩生;;有關(guān)具身認(rèn)知思潮的理論心理學(xué)思考[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2011年05期

6 徐曉東;劉昌;;數(shù)字的空間特性[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2006年06期

7 葉浩生;;具身認(rèn)知:認(rèn)知心理學(xué)的新取向[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2010年05期

8 潘運(yùn);白學(xué)軍;沈德立;;內(nèi)源性注意和外源性注意條件下SOA變化對(duì)SNARC效應(yīng)的影響[J];西南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年10期

9 張麗;陳雪梅;王琦;李紅;;身體形式和社會(huì)環(huán)境對(duì)SNARC效應(yīng)的影響:基于具身認(rèn)知觀的理解[J];心理學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

10 殷融;曲方炳;葉浩生;;“右好左壞”和“左好右壞”——利手與左右空間情感效價(jià)的關(guān)聯(lián)性[J];心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2012年12期

，

本文編號(hào)：2211335