【摘要】：近20年來,具身認(rèn)知作為經(jīng)典認(rèn)知科學(xué)的"叛逆運(yùn)動(dòng)"已經(jīng)取得了令人矚目的成就,但該運(yùn)動(dòng)內(nèi)部沉淀的大量積弊亟待給予必要的反思與清理。通過分析具身認(rèn)知的核心概念、理論假設(shè)、實(shí)驗(yàn)證據(jù)與結(jié)論,認(rèn)為具身認(rèn)知當(dāng)前亟需直面并解決三個(gè)緊密相連的問題:核心概念的界定問題;理論假設(shè)的兼容性問題;論證與解釋的有效性問題。若想實(shí)現(xiàn)認(rèn)知科學(xué)的范式轉(zhuǎn)型,未來的具身認(rèn)知研究必須堅(jiān)定對(duì)經(jīng)典認(rèn)知的替代,排除其他備擇解釋,接受貝葉斯檢驗(yàn)。
[Abstract]:In the past 20 years, the "rebellious movement" with body cognition as a classical cognitive science has made remarkable achievements, but a large number of accumulated disadvantages in the internal sedimentation of the movement need to be reflected and cleaned up urgently. By analyzing the core concepts, theoretical assumptions, experimental evidence and conclusions of physical cognition, it is concluded that there is an urgent need to face and solve three closely related problems: the definition of core concepts, the compatibility of theoretical assumptions, and so on. The validity of argumentation and explanation. If we want to realize the paradigm transformation of cognitive science, we must firmly replace classical cognition, exclude other alternative explanations and accept Bayes test.
【作者單位】： 紹興文理學(xué)院心理學(xué)系;浙江大學(xué)語言與認(rèn)知研究中心;
【基金】：國(guó)家社會(huì)科“現(xiàn)象學(xué)與神經(jīng)科學(xué)對(duì)話中他心問題的重構(gòu)及其超越研究”(16CZX015)的階段性成果
【分類號(hào)】：B842.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 錢旭菁;第二語言研究的效度[J];語言教學(xué)與研究;2003年04期

2 楊銀付;;教育實(shí)驗(yàn)內(nèi)部效度三題[J];教育研究與實(shí)驗(yàn);1991年01期

3 高虹;體育心理實(shí)驗(yàn)效度研究[J];山東體育科技;2002年03期

4 權(quán)朝魯;關(guān)于心理實(shí)驗(yàn)的內(nèi)部效度的問題[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;1995年01期

5 ;[J];;年期

，

本文編號(hào)：2210843