本文主要以美國(guó)建國(guó)初期到十九世紀(jì)三十年代印第安政策作為背景,針對(duì)美國(guó)南方諸州在這些政策演變中角色及其作用,特別是遷移危機(jī)前后這些州與南方切羅基部落多個(gè)司法訴訟及案例中所處的角色來分析,從而說明這一過程在美國(guó)歷史上處理印第安問題參考依據(jù)的演變和影響——也就是白人對(duì)印遷移思想體系的形成和勝利,得出印第安人苦難的根源。有異于傳統(tǒng)史學(xué)觀點(diǎn)的研究側(cè)重點(diǎn),本文從美國(guó)的地方政府,南方諸州權(quán)力機(jī)構(gòu)、司法機(jī)構(gòu)與印第安人之間的關(guān)系的變化和發(fā)展來闡述這一相互關(guān)系對(duì)聯(lián)邦政府、最高法院制定決策的作用和影響,從而說明白人遷移政策思想體系的流行和勝利。 

【文章來源】： 霍毅 西安外國(guó)語(yǔ)大學(xué)

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：71 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABSTRACT
摘要
CHAPTER Ⅰ INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER Ⅱ LITERATURE REVIEW
    2.1 Researches Overseas
    2.2 Researches in China
CHAPTER Ⅲ REMOVAL POLICY CAME INTO BEING
    3.1 Latent Mutual Distrust
    3.2 The United States’Earlier Indian Policy
    3.3 Alternative Solution: the Removal
CHAPTER Ⅳ CHEROKEES’RESPONSE AND THEIR SELF-SALVATION
    4.1 The Importance of Land to the Cherokees
    4.2 Traditional Cherokee Social System under Transformation
    4.3 Cherokees’ Nationalist Movement and the Removal Crisis
        4.3.1 On the Way to a Sovereign Nation
        4.3.2 The Pressure from the Whites
CHAPTER Ⅴ SOURCE OF LAW FOR THE AMERICAN COURTS DURING THE REMOVAL CRISIS: THE PRECEDENTS
    5.1 European Theories on Indigenous Sovereignty and Land
    5.2 America’s Earlier Precedents on the Indian Land Issues
        5.2.1 Fletcher v. Peck
        5.2.2 Johnson v. McIntosh
CHAPTER Ⅵ REINFORCEMENT OF THE INDIAN REMOVAL IN SOUTHERN STATES
    6.1 The Passage of the Removal Act
    6.2 State’s Jurisdiction over the Cherokee Land: Georgia v. Tassels
    6.3 “Domestic Dependent Nation”and Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
    6.4 Southern States’Response and Caldwell v. Alabama
CHAPTER Ⅶ THE SOUTHERN REMOVAL IDEOLOGY:THE LAW OF THE LAND
    7.1 Worcester v. Georgia—An Unfulfilled Guarantee from Marshall
    7.2 Tennessee v. Forman—The Law of the Land
CHAPTER Ⅷ THE TRIUMPH OF THE REMOVAL IDEOLOGY
CHAPTER Ⅸ CONCLUSION
WORKS CITED



本文編號(hào)：3522649