【摘要】： 海外華人與海外印度人作為世界上兩支人口數(shù)目巨大的移民群體,無疑是全球移民史上一大壯舉。同時(shí),這兩只移民族群又分別與中國(guó)、印度兩國(guó)有著緊密地聯(lián)系,有不同的地方,更有較大的相似性,因而具有可比性。本論文在對(duì)海外印度人與海外華人移民新加坡的歷史和現(xiàn)狀等基本情況進(jìn)行分析的基礎(chǔ)上,對(duì)兩者進(jìn)行移民原因、經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力、文化教育、宗教信仰、擇偶模式、競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力以及中印兩國(guó)的移民(僑民)政策等方面作比較研究,選用了英文原著和印度外交部官方網(wǎng)站上的報(bào)告等原始資料,也參考了前人的研究成果。 本文的行文結(jié)構(gòu)安排如下:第一章為緒論,交代選題緣由、本文涉及的幾個(gè)基本概念、當(dāng)前的研究現(xiàn)狀以及本論文研究方法和研究目的意義;第二章介紹海外印度人與海外華人的基本概況,新加坡簡(jiǎn)介,主要介紹兩支移民群體在東南亞以及新加坡的分布情況與現(xiàn)狀;第三章是本文的重點(diǎn),主要是新加坡的印度人與華人之間的比較研究,涉及經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力、職業(yè)與社會(huì)地位、文化教育、宗教社團(tuán)、配偶選擇等等方面。第四章的內(nèi)容為海外印度人與海外華人對(duì)母國(guó)的影響。第五章中印兩國(guó)政府對(duì)各自的海外移民政策的一個(gè)簡(jiǎn)單比較。 華人“在新加坡的開發(fā)和建設(shè)中作出了不可磨滅的貢獻(xiàn)”,印度人享有“新加坡建設(shè)者”的美譽(yù)。通過對(duì)新加坡兩大移民族群的比較,我們發(fā)現(xiàn),作為新加坡第一和第三大族群,新加坡的華人與印度人在諸多方面如移民的歷程、奮斗過程、與各自母國(guó)的聯(lián)系上等具有較大的相似性;當(dāng)然,從不同宗教、民族背景移民至新加坡的這兩支族群也存在較大的差異,整體上華人在經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力上、社會(huì)地位上要強(qiáng)于印度人,在宗教社團(tuán)、婚姻上要自由些;微觀層面,印度人在教育文化水平上要高于華人;兩支族群的差異隨著時(shí)間的推移在不同的歷史時(shí)期有較大的變化,比如在英國(guó)殖民統(tǒng)治時(shí)期,印度人的經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力要優(yōu)于華人,以印度齊智人高利貸者為典型。新加坡的海外印度人與海外華人表面上并無沖突、但在中印兩國(guó)暗中較勁的大背景下實(shí)則為潛在的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手關(guān)系。這兩大人口族群對(duì)新加坡、對(duì)印度、對(duì)中國(guó)三個(gè)國(guó)家的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展都將產(chǎn)生重大的影響。 總之,印度人與華人,作為新加坡開發(fā)與建設(shè)的兩支重大族群,具有較強(qiáng)的可比性,本文正是基于這一點(diǎn),在學(xué)術(shù)界興起將海外印度人與海外華人作比較研究的熱潮的時(shí)刻,選擇東南亞的新加坡為個(gè)案作比較研究。
[Abstract]:Overseas Chinese and overseas Indians, as two large groups of immigrants in the world, are undoubtedly a feat in the history of global migration. At the same time, these two ethnic groups are closely related to China and India, which are different and more similar, so they are comparable. Based on the analysis of the history and present situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese immigrants to Singapore, this paper makes a comparative study on the causes of migration, economic strength, culture and education, religious belief, spouse selection mode, competitiveness and immigration (expatriate) policies between China and India, and selects the original English works and the report on the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of India. It also refers to the previous research results. The structure of this paper is as follows: the first chapter is the introduction, explaining the reasons for the selected topic, several basic concepts involved in this paper, the current research status and the research methods and significance of this paper. The second chapter introduces the basic situation of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese, Singapore, mainly introduces the distribution and current situation of the two immigration groups in Southeast Asia and Singapore. The third chapter is the focus of this paper, mainly the comparative study between Indians and Chinese in Singapore, involving economic strength, occupation and social status, culture and education, religious associations, spouse choice and so on. The fourth chapter is about the influence of overseas Indians and overseas Chinese on their home countries. The fifth chapter is a simple comparison between the Chinese and Indian governments on their overseas immigration policies. The Chinese have made indelible contributions to the development and construction of Singapore, and Indians enjoy the reputation of "Singapore builders". Through the comparison of the two major migrant groups in Singapore, we find that, as the first and third largest ethnic groups in Singapore, the Chinese and Indians in Singapore have great similarities in many aspects, such as the process of immigration, the process of struggle, and the connection with their respective home countries. Of course, there are also great differences between the two ethnic groups emigrating from different religions and ethnic backgrounds to Singapore. On the whole, the economic strength and social status of the Chinese are stronger than those of the Indians, and the religious associations and marriages are freer. At the micro level, Indians are higher than the Chinese in the level of education and culture. The differences between the two ethnic groups have changed greatly in different historical periods with the passage of time. For example, during the British colonial rule, the economic strength of Indians was better than that of Chinese. There is no apparent conflict between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese in Singapore, but it is a potential competitor against the backdrop of a covert struggle between China and India. These two major population groups will have a significant impact on Singapore, India and the long-term development of the three countries in China. In a word, Indians and Chinese, as two major ethnic groups developed and built in Singapore, have a strong comparability. Based on this, this paper chooses Singapore in Southeast Asia as a case study at a time when the academic community is on the rise to make comparative studies between overseas Indians and overseas Chinese.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：云南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：K339

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前4條

1 莊國(guó)土;海外貿(mào)易和南洋開發(fā)與閩南華僑出國(guó)的關(guān)系──兼論華僑出國(guó)的原因[J];華僑華人歷史研究;1994年02期

2 郭梁;試論東南亞華人企業(yè)集團(tuán)的發(fā)展和前景[J];華僑華人歷史研究;1997年04期

3 莊國(guó)土;論東南亞的華族[J];世界民族;2002年03期

4 劉華;中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨與新中國(guó)僑務(wù)事業(yè)[J];中共中央黨校學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2500717