東亞國際秩序瓦解過程中的中古各國關(guān)系
發(fā)布時間：2019-02-25 14:23
【摘要】： 本文從東亞的角度出發(fā)來研究中古時期中國與周邊國家的關(guān)系。正文分為四章，分別對漢末三國時期的遼東公孫政權(quán)，魏、晉、前燕的東夷校尉，北魏與高句麗的交往，劉宋與倭國的交往等問題予以探討，形成了以下一些基本觀點： 一，遼東公孫氏的崛起是漢末三國時期東亞世界政治格局上的一個重大變化。該政權(quán)為逃離中原的漢族士民提供了一個安定的避難所。在其治下，遼東社會政治、經(jīng)濟、文化水平都有長足進步。隨著漢族與周邊各東亞民族交往的加深，上述成果惠及整個東亞世界。然而，作為一個分裂割據(jù)政權(quán)，遼東公孫政權(quán)不具備重建國際秩序的實力。面對著復雜的民族競爭和巨大生存壓力，公孫政權(quán)在處理與東亞諸族的關(guān)系時，更傾向于依靠權(quán)謀來追逐現(xiàn)實利益，這在一定程度上加速了漢代東亞國際秩序的瓦解。 二，魏晉時期中國在東北邊疆設(shè)置東夷校尉統(tǒng)領(lǐng)周邊各民族。隨著歷史的發(fā)展，這項旨在“以華統(tǒng)夷”的制度設(shè)計，逐漸轉(zhuǎn)變成“為夷變夏”，最終更是“由夷授夷”。這一明顯含有中華文化優(yōu)越感的職位的變遷，不但是東北地區(qū)政治局勢轉(zhuǎn)變的寫照，更是中華文化不斷向外傳遞，融合中古東北亞地區(qū)諸民族的事實反映。 三，北魏與高句麗缺乏建立穩(wěn)定持久外交關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)。作為整個東亞世界外交角逐與權(quán)謀較量的一部分，高句麗與北魏的外交關(guān)系即便在最穩(wěn)定的時期也充滿了變數(shù)。 四，宋倭交往展開的最初階段，彼此之間仍需相互適應(yīng)。公元438年和公元472年是影響東亞局勢變遷的兩道分水嶺，宋、倭政權(quán)隨著形勢的發(fā)展不斷調(diào)整自己的外交政策。隨著地區(qū)局勢逐漸明朗，倭國認識到南朝政權(quán)不可能滿足其政治意愿，因而終止了冊封的請求。雖然政權(quán)間正式的往來陷入停頓，但倭國對中國南朝政權(quán)的文化、制度有了直觀的感受，，這對倭國日后的發(fā)展及新東亞世界格局的形成都有不可忽視的影響。
[Abstract]:From the point of view of East Asia, this paper studies the relationship between China and its neighboring countries in the Middle Ancient period. The text is divided into four chapters, respectively, in the period of the three Kingdoms in the late Han Dynasty, the Gongsun regime in eastern Liaoning, Wei, Jin, Dongyi Warrant Officer of the former Yan, the communication between the Northern Wei Dynasty and Koguryo, and the communication between Liu Song and Japan, and so on. The following basic viewpoints have been formed: first, the rise of Gongsun in Liaodong was a significant change in the world political pattern of East Asia in the late Han Dynasty and the end of the three Kingdoms. The regime provided a safe haven for Han Chinese fleeing the Central Plains. Under its rule, Liaodong social politics, economy, cultural level has made great progress. With the deepening of the communication between the Han nationality and the surrounding East Asian nations, the above achievements benefit the whole East Asian world. However, as a separatist regime, Liaodong Gongsun regime does not have the strength to rebuild the international order. In the face of complicated national competition and great pressure of survival, the Gongsun regime, in dealing with the relations with the East Asian ethnic groups, tends to rely on power to pursue realistic interests, which to a certain extent accelerated the disintegration of the international order in East Asia in the Han Dynasty. Second, in the Wei and Jin dynasties, China set up the Dongyi School Ensign in the northeast frontier to lead the surrounding nationalities. With the development of history, this system design, which aims at "unifying the Chinese people", has gradually changed into "Yi into summer", and finally "from Yi to Yi". This change of position, which obviously contains the sense of superiority of Chinese culture, is not only a reflection of the transformation of the political situation in Northeast China, but also a reflection of the fact that the Chinese culture continues to pass on to the outside world and integrates the ethnic groups in Middle and Ancient Northeast Asia. Third, the Northern Wei Dynasty and Koguryo lacked the foundation to establish stable and lasting diplomatic relations. As part of the diplomatic rivalry and collusion of the whole East Asian world, the diplomatic relations between Gaogouli and the Northern Wei Dynasty were full of uncertainties even during the most stable period. Fourth, the initial stage of Song-Japanese exchanges, they still need to adapt to each other. A.D. 438 and AD 472 were two watersheds that affected the changes of the situation in East Asia. The Song Dynasty and the Japanese regime adjusted their foreign policy along with the development of the situation. As the regional situation became clearer, Japan realized that the regime of the Southern Dynasty could not satisfy its political will and terminated its request for canonization. Although formal exchanges between regimes came to a standstill, Japan had an intuitive feeling on the culture and system of China's regime in the Southern Dynasty, which had an innegligible impact on the future development of Japan and the formation of the new East Asian world pattern.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K31
本文編號：2430268
[Abstract]:From the point of view of East Asia, this paper studies the relationship between China and its neighboring countries in the Middle Ancient period. The text is divided into four chapters, respectively, in the period of the three Kingdoms in the late Han Dynasty, the Gongsun regime in eastern Liaoning, Wei, Jin, Dongyi Warrant Officer of the former Yan, the communication between the Northern Wei Dynasty and Koguryo, and the communication between Liu Song and Japan, and so on. The following basic viewpoints have been formed: first, the rise of Gongsun in Liaodong was a significant change in the world political pattern of East Asia in the late Han Dynasty and the end of the three Kingdoms. The regime provided a safe haven for Han Chinese fleeing the Central Plains. Under its rule, Liaodong social politics, economy, cultural level has made great progress. With the deepening of the communication between the Han nationality and the surrounding East Asian nations, the above achievements benefit the whole East Asian world. However, as a separatist regime, Liaodong Gongsun regime does not have the strength to rebuild the international order. In the face of complicated national competition and great pressure of survival, the Gongsun regime, in dealing with the relations with the East Asian ethnic groups, tends to rely on power to pursue realistic interests, which to a certain extent accelerated the disintegration of the international order in East Asia in the Han Dynasty. Second, in the Wei and Jin dynasties, China set up the Dongyi School Ensign in the northeast frontier to lead the surrounding nationalities. With the development of history, this system design, which aims at "unifying the Chinese people", has gradually changed into "Yi into summer", and finally "from Yi to Yi". This change of position, which obviously contains the sense of superiority of Chinese culture, is not only a reflection of the transformation of the political situation in Northeast China, but also a reflection of the fact that the Chinese culture continues to pass on to the outside world and integrates the ethnic groups in Middle and Ancient Northeast Asia. Third, the Northern Wei Dynasty and Koguryo lacked the foundation to establish stable and lasting diplomatic relations. As part of the diplomatic rivalry and collusion of the whole East Asian world, the diplomatic relations between Gaogouli and the Northern Wei Dynasty were full of uncertainties even during the most stable period. Fourth, the initial stage of Song-Japanese exchanges, they still need to adapt to each other. A.D. 438 and AD 472 were two watersheds that affected the changes of the situation in East Asia. The Song Dynasty and the Japanese regime adjusted their foreign policy along with the development of the situation. As the regional situation became clearer, Japan realized that the regime of the Southern Dynasty could not satisfy its political will and terminated its request for canonization. Although formal exchanges between regimes came to a standstill, Japan had an intuitive feeling on the culture and system of China's regime in the Southern Dynasty, which had an innegligible impact on the future development of Japan and the formation of the new East Asian world pattern.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：博士
【學位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：K31
【引證文獻】
相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條
1 胡亞男;論公孫氏政權(quán)的海東經(jīng)略[D];東北師范大學;2012年
本文編號：2430268
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/xifanglishiwenhua/2430268.html
最近更新
教材專著
