【摘要】：在啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)盛期,伏爾泰是負(fù)責(zé)監(jiān)管圖書貿(mào)易的警察戴梅里的重點(diǎn)監(jiān)控對(duì)象,在其工作日志中伏爾泰的名字曾頻頻出現(xiàn)。在《戴梅里日志》中,由反啟蒙喉舌《文學(xué)年代》主編弗雷隆提供的逸聞,將伏爾泰刻畫成道德敗壞、狂妄自負(fù)的無(wú)恥之徒。而與之不同的是,戴梅里盡管將伏爾泰視作一個(gè)"壞臣民",但總體上對(duì)他持開(kāi)明溫和的態(tài)度,并對(duì)其才智表現(xiàn)出一定的欣賞和尊重�！洞髅防锶罩尽酚涗浀臅窟�進(jìn)一步揭示,戴梅里盡管注意到了幾乎所有的啟蒙哲人及其作品以及圍繞他們發(fā)生的思想沖突,但卻沒(méi)有察覺(jué)到"啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)"。反而是以弗雷隆為代表的反啟蒙勢(shì)力將啟蒙哲人們視作一個(gè)渾然一體的群體,構(gòu)想出"啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)"這股思想潮流并與之激烈論戰(zhàn)。戴梅里與以弗雷隆為代表的反啟蒙勢(shì)力之間的這種差異,揭示出啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)、反啟蒙運(yùn)動(dòng)與權(quán)力當(dāng)局之間的復(fù)雜關(guān)系。
[Abstract]:At the height of the Enlightenment, Voltaire was the focus of the book trade police, whose name appeared frequently in his journal. In the Dimelli Journal, an anecdote provided by Freron, editor of the anti-enlightenment mouthpiece the Literary Age, portrays Voltaire as a demoralized, conceited, unscrupulous man. By contrast, although he regarded Voltaire as a "bad subject," he was generally open-minded and gentle, and showed some appreciation and respect for his intellect. Although he noticed almost all the enlightenment philosophers and their works and the ideological conflicts around them, he did not notice the Enlightenment. On the contrary, the anti-enlightenment forces represented by Freon regarded the enlightening philosophers as an integrated group, conceived the ideological trend of the "Enlightenment Movement" and argued fiercely with it. This difference between Demeri and the anti-enlightenment forces represented by Freon reveals the complex relationship between the Enlightenment, the anti-Enlightenment and the power authorities.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)歷史文化學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：K565.3
，

本文編號(hào)：2167954