本文選題：埃吉那 + 雅典��； 參考：《西南大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在希臘歷史上,雅典在波斯戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間憑借其強(qiáng)大的海軍對(duì)抗波斯艦隊(duì),為希臘人最終戰(zhàn)勝波斯人作出了重大貢獻(xiàn)。戰(zhàn)后,雅典國(guó)力日益強(qiáng)大,出現(xiàn)了空前的繁榮局面。 如果要研究雅典帝國(guó)和雅典海軍發(fā)展史,考察公元前5世紀(jì)東地中海世界的國(guó)際關(guān)系,那么就不得不考察雅典與另一個(gè)海上強(qiáng)國(guó)埃吉那之間的關(guān)系史。位于阿提卡半島的雅典,原本是一個(gè)海軍實(shí)力平平的農(nóng)業(yè)城邦,直到公元前5世紀(jì)初,仍因?yàn)楹Ｉ蟿?shì)力弱小而常常遭到埃吉那人的侵?jǐn)_。隨著雅典城邦內(nèi)部矛盾的逐步調(diào)整,迫于自身勢(shì)力的發(fā)展和向外擴(kuò)張的需要,她必須沖出薩羅尼灣這個(gè)門(mén)檻。而近在咫尺的埃吉那,勢(shì)必成為雅典向外發(fā)展的一個(gè)絆腳石。正當(dāng)雅典開(kāi)始發(fā)展海軍以應(yīng)對(duì)埃吉那之時(shí),希波戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)了,雅典利用海軍在希波戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中發(fā)揮了重要作用,并以此為契機(jī)擊敗埃吉那等海上近鄰,一躍為希臘第一海上強(qiáng)國(guó)。因此,考察雅典的海上勢(shì)力發(fā)展史,就必須關(guān)注雅典與埃吉那之間關(guān)系。全文由緒論、正文和參考文獻(xiàn)三部分組成。其中正文分為四部分。 第一部分:介紹埃吉那的基本情況。學(xué)界對(duì)埃吉那的關(guān)注程度要遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)低于對(duì)雅典的關(guān)注程度,因此有必要對(duì)埃吉那做一個(gè)基本的介紹 第二部分:剖析埃吉那與雅典之間矛盾產(chǎn)生的基本原因。主要從商業(yè)競(jìng)爭(zhēng)、民族特性、地理環(huán)境三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的討論;闡述雅典與埃吉那的關(guān)系史的一些問(wèn)題其中包括矛盾的最初產(chǎn)生——”神像事件”、逐步發(fā)展——不宣而戰(zhàn)、人質(zhì)事件和雅典海軍的創(chuàng)建。雅典勢(shì)力的發(fā)展并要求戰(zhàn)勝埃吉那是雅典與埃吉那矛盾逐漸升級(jí)的主要原因。 第三部分:雅典戰(zhàn)勝埃吉那。這一過(guò)程分為兩個(gè)步驟:一是公元前457雅典出兵戰(zhàn)勝埃吉那將其列為納貢國(guó);二是公元前431年,雅典驅(qū)逐埃吉那居民并在埃吉那土地上安置移民。 第四部分:雅典對(duì)埃吉那的移民類(lèi)型。就斐圭拉所認(rèn)為的埃吉那屬于“epoikoi”的而不是所謂軍事移民“cleruchs”的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行討論。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分:對(duì)古希臘歷史時(shí)期城邦之間的關(guān)系問(wèn)題進(jìn)行界定,奴隸制時(shí)期的國(guó)家之間就是一個(gè)弱肉強(qiáng)食的關(guān)系,城邦之間遠(yuǎn)非自治也非單純的聯(lián)盟。
[Abstract]:In the history of Greece, Athens fought against the Persian fleet with its powerful navy during the Persian War, making a great contribution to the Greeks' final victory over the Persians. After the war, Athens increasingly strong national strength, the emergence of unprecedented prosperity. If we want to study the history of the Athenian Empire and the history of the Athenian navy and the international relations of the eastern Mediterranean world in the 5th century B.C., then we have to examine the history of relations between Athens and another maritime power, Ejina. Athens, on the Attica Peninsula, was once a modest agricultural city-state, and until the beginning of the 5th century BC it was often invaded by the Ejinas because of its small maritime influence. With the gradual adjustment of the inner contradictions of the Athenian city-states, she had to break the threshold of Saroni Bay because of the development of her own power and the need of outward expansion. And the near-near Ejina, is bound to become Athens to the outward development of a stumbling block. When Athens began to develop its navy to deal with Ejina, the Hippo War broke out. Athens took advantage of the navy to play an important role in the Hipo War, and used this opportunity to defeat Egina and become Greece's first maritime power. Therefore, to study the history of maritime power in Athens, we must pay attention to the relationship between Athens and Ejina. The full text consists of three parts: introduction, text and reference. The text is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the basic situation of Ejina. The academic circles pay much less attention to Egina than to Athens, so it is necessary to make a basic introduction to the second part: to analyze the basic reasons of the contradiction between Egina and Athens. Mainly from the commercial competition, national characteristics, geographical environment three aspects of a systematic discussion; explain the history of relations between Athens and Ajina some problems, including the initial contradictions-"idol incident," the gradual development of the undeclared war, The hostage incident and the creation of the Athenian Navy. The development of Athenian forces and the demand to overcome Egina are the main reasons for the gradual escalation of the contradiction between Athens and Egina. The third part: Athens defeats Ejina. The process was divided into two steps: first, Athens sent troops to defeat Ejina in 457 BC and listed it as a tributary; second, in 431 BC, Athens expelled Ejina residents and settled immigrants on the land of Ejina. The fourth part: the type of immigrants from Athens to Ejina. Discuss Figuera's view that Egigna belongs to the "epoikoi" rather than the so-called "cleruchs" of military immigration. Conclusion: the relationship between the city-states in the historical period of ancient Greece is defined. During the period of slavery, the relationship between the states is a law of the jungle, and the city-states are far from autonomous or simple alliance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：K125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 徐松巖,李電;關(guān)于希臘城邦同盟的幾點(diǎn)看法[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年03期

2 徐松巖;論古典時(shí)代希臘經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展趨勢(shì)[J];重慶師院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年01期

3 郝際陶;論古代雅典的商貿(mào)活動(dòng)[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期

4 王以欣;古希臘神話與土地占有權(quán)[J];世界歷史;2002年04期

5 李丹柯;埃吉那與地米斯托克利海軍政策的關(guān)系[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1980年03期

6 吳素梅;古希臘土著民族探源[J];世界民族;2003年05期

7 婁琳,徐松巖;關(guān)于希臘羅馬海上勢(shì)力的歷史反思——海上勢(shì)力與西方文明研究之一[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年01期

8 徐松巖;論雅典帝國(guó)[J];西南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1999年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：2092728