本文選題：管不著 + 民間輿論　； 參考：《財(cái)會(huì)月刊》2014年32期

【摘要】：正歷史上,英國(guó)莊園一直是私人物業(yè),幾百年來(lái),拆了建、建了拆,與誰(shuí)也不相關(guān),誰(shuí)也管不著。莊園不僅代表著財(cái)富,更代表著權(quán)力,說(shuō)它是"權(quán)力莊園"更為貼切。尤其到了十八世紀(jì),那時(shí)王室勢(shì)力已漸漸削弱,正是貴族掌權(quán)之時(shí),收入來(lái)源多且豐厚,稅很輕甚至沒(méi)有。勞動(dòng)力也不缺,能在莊園里工作意味著體面和保障,雖然必須在莊園里的樓下(仆人工作和休息的
[Abstract]:Historically, British manors have been private properties. For hundreds of years, they have been demolished, built, and unconnected with no one. Manor not only represents wealth, but also power, it is more appropriate to say that it is "power manor". By the eighteenth century, in particular, royalty had waned, when aristocrats came to power, with large and generous sources of income and low or no taxes. There is no shortage of labor, and being able to work in a manor means dignity and security, though it must be downstairs (servants work and rest)
【分類號(hào)】：F299.233.47
，

本文編號(hào)：1907702