本文選題：韓國 + 日本��； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2008年博士論文

【摘要】： 本論文擬以“乙巳五條約”為研究主題,來論述日本對(duì)韓國確立保護(hù)權(quán),并說明該條約是日本明治維新以來的既定大陸政策的結(jié)果,也是日本強(qiáng)迫韓國皇帝和政府大臣簽訂的條約。按照時(shí)際法原則和傳統(tǒng)國際法對(duì)“乙巳五條約”進(jìn)行法律評(píng)價(jià),認(rèn)定該約是自始無效。論文共分七大部分,即由四個(gè)章節(jié)構(gòu)成論文主體,還包括緒論、結(jié)論、文獻(xiàn)資料。 第一章主要把“征韓論”的出籠到“韓日協(xié)定書”的被迫締結(jié)作為斷限,論述日本“征韓論”的實(shí)施導(dǎo)致了中日甲午戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā),進(jìn)而闡明日俄戰(zhàn)爭就是甲午戰(zhàn)爭的繼續(xù)。日本不顧韓國局外中立宣言,強(qiáng)占韓國全境,逐步確立對(duì)韓國的“顧問政治”體制。 第二章以日本策劃、締結(jié)“乙巳五條約”的過程為主要內(nèi)容,論述該約是在韓國大臣們被禁閉在會(huì)議廳內(nèi)并受到肉體刑罰的威脅下簽訂的�！兑宜任鍡l約》的簽訂,立即引起韓國廣大人民的不滿和強(qiáng)烈反對(duì)。 第三章視“乙巳五條約”締結(jié)到高宗皇帝被迫退位為斷限,論述高宗皇帝不僅未曾裁可該約,而且直到其被迫退位前夕,不懈進(jìn)行使該約無效化的密使外交斗爭。光武帝絕對(duì)未曾投降于日本。也未曾主動(dòng)屈服而玷污過神圣的國體。 第四章以國際法理論評(píng)價(jià)“乙巳五條約”。不論是根據(jù)當(dāng)時(shí)大韓帝國的國內(nèi)法,還是適用“時(shí)際法”原則依照19、20世紀(jì)之交的國際法,可以說該約從未成立,而以此為基礎(chǔ)的1910年《韓國并合條約》當(dāng)然也無效。這樣一來,日本在韓國的“殖民統(tǒng)治”將成為軍事強(qiáng)占行為。因此,日方應(yīng)對(duì)韓國36年間的非法占領(lǐng)行為進(jìn)行賠償并補(bǔ)償自己的過失。 本論文在充分吸收前人研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上,在如下方面有所創(chuàng)意:一,研究100年前日本強(qiáng)占大韓帝國的過程,以明了日本對(duì)韓國確立保護(hù)權(quán),是日俄戰(zhàn)爭前后出籠的“指導(dǎo)”、“保護(hù)”、“監(jiān)理(control為支配之意)”三個(gè)侵略階段之一的第二個(gè)階段,其侵略目的為最終吞并韓國;二,早在1904年5、6月之交,日本內(nèi)閣和天皇首次決定對(duì)韓國實(shí)行保護(hù)權(quán)或加以吞并的侵略計(jì)劃;三,明確了“乙巳五條約”是強(qiáng)迫韓國皇帝和政府大臣簽訂的條約,而高宗皇帝則“從未允準(zhǔn)”;四,按照當(dāng)時(shí)的國際法和韓國國內(nèi)法,“乙巳五條約”是不存在和自始無效的。
[Abstract]:This thesis intends to take the "five treaties of Yesi" as the research topic to discuss Japan's establishment of the right of protection over Korea, and to explain that the treaty is the result of Japan's established mainland policy since the Meiji Restoration. It was also a treaty that Japan forced the Korean emperor and the government minister to sign. According to the principle of intertemporal law and traditional international law, the legal evaluation of the five treaties of Yesi is held to be null and void from the beginning. The paper is divided into seven parts, which consists of four chapters, including introduction, conclusion and literature. In the first chapter, the forced conclusion of "Korea and Japan Agreement" is taken as a cut-off limit, and the implementation of Japanese "theory of Korean conscription" leads to the outbreak of Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese Sino-Japanese War, and then clarifies that the Japanese-Russian War is the continuation of the Sino-Japanese War. In spite of the declaration of South Korea's neutrality, Japan gradually established a system of "advisory politics" to South Korea. The second chapter takes the process of Japan's planning and conclusion of the "five treaties of Yesi" as its main content, and discusses that the treaty was signed under the threat of physical punishment and the confinement of Korean ministers in the chamber. Immediately aroused the dissatisfaction and strong opposition of the broad masses of the Korean people. The third chapter regards the conclusion of the "five treaties of Yesi" to the forced abdication of the emperor Gaozong as a ruling limit, and discusses that the emperor of Gao Zong not only did not cut the treaty, but also unremittingly engaged in the diplomatic struggle of emissary to invalidate the treaty until the eve of his forced abdication. Emperor Guangwu never surrendered to Japan. Nor have they voluntarily succumbed to the sacredness of the state. The fourth chapter evaluates the five treaties of IBS on the basis of the theory of international law. Whether according to the domestic law of the Korean Empire at that time or the application of the principle of "intertemporal law" according to the international law at the turn of the 20th century, it can be said that the treaty has never been established, and the 1910 Treaty of Korean Unification based on it is of course null and void. In this way, Japan's "colonial rule" in South Korea will become a military occupation. So Japan should compensate South Korea for its 36-year illegal occupation and compensate for its negligence. On the basis of fully absorbing the previous research results, this paper has some ideas in the following aspects: first, the study of the process of Japan's forcible occupation of the Korean Empire 100 years ago makes it clear that Japan has established the right to protect Korea, which is the "guide" that emerged before and after the Japanese-Russian War. The second stage of one of the three stages of aggression aimed at the eventual annexation of Korea; second, as early as May, June 1904, The Japanese cabinet and the emperor decided for the first time to impose a plan of aggression to protect or annex Korea; third, it was made clear that the "five treaties" were treaties that forced the Korean emperor and government ministers to sign, while Emperor Gao Zong "never allowed it"; fourth, According to the international law of that time and the domestic law of Korea, the five treaties of Yesi did not exist and were null and void from the beginning.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：K313.4;K312.4

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 王志偉;;日俄戰(zhàn)爭之后朝鮮半島地緣戰(zhàn)略地位的弱化[A];中國朝鮮史研究會(huì)會(huì)刊——朝鮮·韓國歷史研究（第十三輯）[C];2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1873314