本文選題：前近代 + 東亞秩序��； 參考：《中國邊疆史地研究》2017年03期

【摘要】：在前近代東亞地區(qū)的歷史場景下,以北方游牧族群和政權與南方農(nóng)業(yè)族群和政權之間為主的互動與凝聚,不僅形成了以儒家文化為核心的東亞文明圈,而且也構建了被后世稱之為"東亞秩序"的政治格局,進而在此基礎上形成了一整套有關該地區(qū)特別是多民族國家政治、經(jīng)濟、民族與文化生態(tài)的獨特思想、觀念與敘事話語體系。近代以來歐美列強的入侵及其主導的近現(xiàn)代國際秩序,則打破和取代了傳統(tǒng)的"東亞秩序"政治格局與思想體系,并試圖在西方政治傳統(tǒng)和強勢學術話語體系之下解構與重構中國多民族國家形成與發(fā)展的歷史,從根本上實現(xiàn)其所構建的"去中國中心主義"。在此情況下,立足前近代東亞歷史發(fā)展的實際情況,從多民族國家疆域自身的演變歷史、思想基礎、制度體系與政策實踐等四個層面總結(jié)、提煉與構建自成體系的本土疆域理論與學術話語體系,不僅為我們與西方學術界展開客觀而平等的學術對話提供了基礎與可能,而且對建設中國特色的邊疆學學科體系也具有重要的現(xiàn)實意義。
[Abstract]:In the historical scene of East Asia before modern times, the interaction and cohesion between nomadic groups and regimes in the north and agricultural communities and regimes in the south not only formed the circle of East Asian civilization with Confucian culture as the core. Moreover, it has also constructed a political pattern called "East Asian order" by later generations, and on this basis has formed a set of unique ideas about the political, economic, national and cultural ecology of the region, especially in the multi-ethnic countries. Ideas and narrative discourse system. Since modern times, the invasion of European and American powers and the modern and modern international order have broken and replaced the traditional political pattern and ideological system of "order in East Asia". It also attempts to deconstruct and reconstruct the history of the formation and development of China's multi-ethnic country under the western political tradition and strong academic discourse system, and to fundamentally realize its construction of "decentralism in China". In this case, based on the actual situation of the historical development of East Asia before modern times, this paper summarizes the evolution history, ideological basis, system system and policy practice of the territory of multinational countries. The extraction and construction of local territorial theory and academic discourse system not only provide the basis and possibility for us to carry out an objective and equal academic dialogue with the western academic circles. Moreover, it is of great practical significance to construct the discipline system of frontier science with Chinese characteristics.
【作者單位】： 陜西師范大學中國西部邊疆研究院;
【分類號】：K31-5

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 宋蕾;;析中亞多民族國家形成的原因[J];黑龍江史志;2011年02期

2 ;宋魯鄭:南斯拉夫悲劇視野下的新疆騷亂[J];紅旗文稿;2009年14期

3 侯萬鋒;;民族聯(lián)邦制對多民族國家的政治整合——以蘇聯(lián)和南斯拉夫為例[J];西伯利亞研究;2008年01期

4 郝嵐峰;;《美國種族簡史》,一本不可不看的好書[J];祝你幸福(午后);2012年10期

5 弗·德馬基;趙錦元;李銀妹;;歐洲民族結(jié)構[J];民族譯叢;1984年02期

6 錢放;歷史教學要注意培養(yǎng)學生馬克思主義的民族觀[J];北京師范學院學報(社會科學版);1989年01期

7 張宏毅;早期美利堅人的民族性格[J];世界歷史;1986年08期

8 王戎笙;關于清初的戰(zhàn)爭問題[J];史學集刊;1986年01期

，

本文編號：1861491