本文關(guān)鍵詞： 英國 朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭 聯(lián)合國　出處：《山西大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 二戰(zhàn)后,世界大國由合作走向?qū)?國際冷戰(zhàn)的氣氛也漫延到東亞。英國雖屬西方陣營,但在緩和國際冷戰(zhàn)氛圍,避免雙方發(fā)生直接對峙方面不遺余力�？梢哉f,英國是遏制世界大戰(zhàn)的一大主力,在戰(zhàn)后國際關(guān)系中發(fā)揮了重要的作用。 本文以英國本身為出發(fā)點(diǎn),考察英國在此時(shí)期中與朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭有著密切聯(lián)系的中、美、蘇各大國之間的互動(dòng),全面地分析整個(gè)朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭過程中的國家因素,以期形成對英國在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭過程中所發(fā)揮作用的清晰認(rèn)識(shí)。同時(shí)將本著歷史唯物主義和辯證唯物主義的基本原則,遵從歷史發(fā)展趨勢,通過對具體史料的掌握來綜合分析影響英國在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭中行為的多種因素,運(yùn)用國際關(guān)系相關(guān)理論進(jìn)一步加深理解。 1950年6月朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭的爆發(fā)使兩大陣營在東亞的對峙公開化,英國雖然在朝鮮沒有任何經(jīng)濟(jì)利益和戰(zhàn)略利益,但仍被迫卷入這場紛爭。對于英國來說,朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭是一場具有雙重意義的政治戰(zhàn),它不僅要關(guān)心敵對方的行動(dòng),而且更重要的是要建立一個(gè)有益于英國利益的世界秩序。 本文共分六部分,包括引言,正文四個(gè)章節(jié)以及結(jié)語,主要內(nèi)容如下: 引言部分評述了該選題的研究現(xiàn)狀,指出了進(jìn)行該選題研究的目的和意義。 第一章,主要介紹朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭爆發(fā)初期英國的反應(yīng)。英國支持聯(lián)合國關(guān)于朝鮮問題的決議,但卻反對美國武裝干涉臺(tái)灣,不愿向朝鮮戰(zhàn)場派遣陸軍部隊(duì),并且積極探求和平解決問題的途徑。 第二章,以“聯(lián)合國軍”是否越過三八線為引,探討英國為防止戰(zhàn)爭規(guī)模擴(kuò)大所作的努力,包括積極醞釀非軍事緩沖區(qū)計(jì)劃以及努力抑制中美沖突。 第三章,圍繞美國威脅使用原子武器事件闡明英國為此付出的努力,以及英國對英美兩國分歧的協(xié)調(diào)。 第四章,主要探討從1951年6月停戰(zhàn)談判達(dá)成至1953年7月朝鮮停戰(zhàn)協(xié)定簽訂的整個(gè)過程中英國的作為。從開啟停戰(zhàn)談判大門到推進(jìn)和談過程直至戰(zhàn)俘問題的解決,英國為此孜孜不倦。 結(jié)語,得出英國在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭中的基本政策以及決定這一政策的根源。雖然英國在朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭中發(fā)揮了一定的積極作用,但實(shí)力的下降使得英國在外交上只能奉行溫和的約束性政策。
[Abstract]:After World War II, the world powers changed from cooperation to confrontation, and the atmosphere of the international cold war spread to East Asia. Although Britain belongs to the Western camp, it has spared no effort in easing the atmosphere of the international cold war and avoiding direct confrontation between the two sides. Britain was the main force to contain the World War and played an important role in postwar international relations. Taking Britain itself as the starting point, this paper examines the interaction between China, the United States and the Soviet Union, which is closely related to the Korean War at this time, and comprehensively analyzes the national factors in the whole Korean War process. In order to form a clear understanding of the role played by Britain in the Korean War. At the same time, it will follow the basic principles of historical materialism and dialectical materialism and follow the trend of historical development. By mastering the specific historical data, this paper comprehensively analyzes the various factors that influence Britain's conduct in the Korean War, and makes use of the relevant theories of international relations to further deepen the understanding. In June 1950, the outbreak of the Korean War made the confrontation between the two camps public in East Asia. Britain, although it had no economic or strategic interests in North Korea, was still forced to get involved in the dispute. The Korean War is a political war of dual significance. It is not only concerned about the actions of the adversaries, but more importantly, it is necessary to establish a world order that is beneficial to the interests of Britain. This paper is divided into six parts, including the introduction, four chapters of the body and the conclusion, the main content is as follows:. The introduction reviews the research status of this topic, and points out the purpose and significance of the research. The first chapter mainly introduces the British reaction at the beginning of the Korean War. Britain supports the United Nations resolution on the Korean issue, but it opposes US armed intervention in Taiwan and does not want to send army troops to the Korean battlefield. And actively explore a peaceful solution to the problem. In the second chapter, taking whether the United Nations Army crossed the 38th line, the paper discusses the British efforts to prevent the expansion of the war, including the active preparation of the non-military buffer zone plan and the efforts to curb the conflict between China and the United States. Chapter three illustrates Britain's efforts in this regard over the threat of the use of atomic weapons by the United States, as well as its coordination of the differences between the United States and the United States. Chapter 4th, mainly discusses the British actions in the whole process from the armistice negotiations on June 1951 to the signing of the Korean Armistice Agreement on July 1953. From opening the door of armistice negotiations to advancing the peace talks until the resolution of the issue of prisoners of war, Britain has worked tirelessly for it. In conclusion, we draw the basic policy of Britain in the Korean War and the root of the policy. Although Britain played a positive role in the Korean War, But the decline in power has left Britain with only moderate, binding policies.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：K153

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊冠群;;誰需要朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭[J];芳草(經(jīng)典閱讀);2011年06期

2 李慶;;21世紀(jì)中國學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)于英國非殖民化研究的新進(jìn)展[J];科教導(dǎo)刊(中旬刊);2011年08期

3 ;她從畫中來[J];新華航空;2011年07期

4 楊軍偉;;論撒切爾政府的對外政策[J];聊城大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年02期

5 資中筠;;美國認(rèn)為出兵朝鮮是“錯(cuò)誤的戰(zhàn)爭”?[J];芳草(經(jīng)典閱讀);2011年06期

6 楊華文;;論英國在原子彈早期研究史上的地位[J];大慶師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年04期

7 張長江;;六十年前朝鮮局勢之誤判[J];w，

本文編號(hào)：1521575